The jira specification file appears to be out of date with the versions, artifacts and pages currently defined in the IG. A proposed revised file to be reviewed and, if appropriate, submitted as a pull request against the XML folder in https://github.com/HL7/JIRA-Spec-Artifacts. To see the differences, perform a file compare on 'template/jira-current.xml' (a normalized view of what is in Github) and 'template/jira-new.xml' (reflects current IG content)
https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/
error
The reference http://hl7.org/cda/stds/core/StructureDefinition/EIVL_TS could not be resolved
https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/
error
The reference http://hl7.org/cda/stds/core/StructureDefinition/INT_POS could not be resolved
https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/
error
The reference http://hl7.org/cda/stds/core/StructureDefinition/IVL_INT could not be resolved
https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/
error
The reference http://hl7.org/cda/stds/core/StructureDefinition/IVL_PQ could not be resolved
https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/
error
The reference http://hl7.org/cda/stds/core/StructureDefinition/IVL_TS could not be resolved
https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/
error
The reference http://hl7.org/cda/stds/core/StructureDefinition/IVXB_INT could not be resolved
https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/
error
The reference http://hl7.org/cda/stds/core/StructureDefinition/IVXB_PQ could not be resolved
https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/
error
The reference http://hl7.org/cda/stds/core/StructureDefinition/IVXB_TS could not be resolved
https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/
error
The reference http://hl7.org/cda/stds/core/StructureDefinition/PIVL_TS could not be resolved
https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/
error
The reference http://hl7.org/cda/stds/core/StructureDefinition/RTO_PQ_PQ could not be resolved
https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/
error
The reference http://hl7.org/cda/stds/core/StructureDefinition/SXCM_TS could not be resolved
https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/
error
The reference http://hl7.org/cda/stds/core/StructureDefinition/SXPR_TS could not be resolved
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/implementationguide-resource-format could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/implementationguide-resource-format'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
Reference to experimental CodeSystem http://hl7.org/fhir/guide-parameter-code|5.0.0MSG_EXPERIMENTAL
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[1] (l1/c1554)
warning
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.terminology.r5#5.2.0 released on 2023-07-17, but the most recent appropriate version is 6.5.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be consideredIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING_OLD
Resource is not deprecated, but the description mentions deprecated - check whether it should be deprecatedResource is not deprecated, but the description mentions deprecated - check whether it should be deprecated
The concepts in the value set include have not been validated because the code system is not known, and no terminology service supports itVALUESET_INC_CS_NO_SUPPORT
Error from https://tx.fhir.org/r5: Unable to provide support for code system http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode version 7.0.0 (known versions = 9.0.0) (from server, see log)
The code 'CASESBJ' is not valid in the system http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass (Unknown code 'CASESBJ' in the CodeSystem 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass' version '3.1.0')
Editor's Comment: CASESBJ is the actual code. CASEBJ is what is in THO but that has been verified to be wrong.VALUESET_INCLUDE_INVALID_CONCEPT_CODE
The code 'CASESBJ' is not valid in the system http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass (Unknown code 'CASESBJ' in the CodeSystem 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass' version '3.1.0')
Editor's Comment: CASESBJ is the actual code. CASEBJ is what is in THO but that has been verified to be wrong.VALUESET_INCLUDE_INVALID_CONCEPT_CODE
The code 'CASESBJ' is not valid in the system http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass (Unknown code 'CASESBJ' in the CodeSystem 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass' version '3.1.0')
Editor's Comment: CASESBJ is the actual code. CASEBJ is what is in THO but that has been verified to be wrong.VALUESET_INCLUDE_INVALID_CONCEPT_CODE
The code 'CASESBJ' is not valid in the system http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass (Unknown code 'CASESBJ' in the CodeSystem 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass' version '3.1.0')
Editor's Comment: CASESBJ is the actual code. CASEBJ is what is in THO but that has been verified to be wrong.VALUESET_INCLUDE_INVALID_CONCEPT_CODE
Resource is not deprecated, but the description mentions deprecated - check whether it should be deprecatedResource is not deprecated, but the description mentions deprecated - check whether it should be deprecated
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/regex|5.2.0 is deprecated with the note: 'This was deprecated in favor of using a constraint on the element using FHIRPath, since constraints allow for the provision of a human readable message associated with the regex'MSG_DEPENDS_ON_DEPRECATED_NOTE
CASESBJ is the actual code. CASEBJ is what is in THO but that has been verified to be wrong.
The code 'CASESBJ' is not valid in the system http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass% (4 uses)
CDA type names are UpperCamelCase
Constraint failed: eld-20: 'The first component of the path should be UpperCamelCase.% (119 uses)
CDA type names have _ in them
Constraint failed: cnl-0: 'Name should be usable as an identifier for the module by machine processing applications such as code generation'% (15 uses)
Experimental value sets that we are using
The definition for the element 'AuthoringDevice.manufacturerModelName' binds to the value set 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ManufacturerModelNameExample' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental (0 uses)
The definition for the element 'AuthoringDevice.softwareName' binds to the value set 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SoftwareNameExample' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental (0 uses)
The definition for the element 'Device.manufacturerModelName' binds to the value set 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ManufacturerModelNameExample' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental (0 uses)
The definition for the element 'Device.softwareName' binds to the value set 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SoftwareNameExample' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental (0 uses)
Ignore duplicate anchor ids for now
The html source has duplicate anchor Ids:% (139 uses)
This is an auto-include that we don't control
This IG is version 5.0.0, while the IG 'hl7.terminology' is from version 4.0.1 (0 uses)
Warnings from the example CDA document
A code with no system has no defined meaning, and it cannot be validated. A system should be provided (1 uses)
The CDA Template 2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.1.4 / 2024-05-01 is not known (1 uses)
The CDA Template 2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.2.10 / 2014-06-09 is not known (1 uses)
The code '78615007' is valid but is not active (0 uses)
The code 'COND' is valid but is deprecated (0 uses)
xsi:type is unnecessary at this point (3 uses)
We want to fix a bunch of coded fields
Constraint failed: eld-24: 'pattern[x] should be used rather than fixed[x]' (defined in http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ElementDefinition) (Best Practice Recommendation) (435 uses)
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.terminology.r5#5.2.0 released on 2023-07-17, but the most recent appropriate version is 6.5.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be considered
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/regex|5.2.0 is deprecated with the note: 'This was deprecated in favor of using a constraint on the element using FHIRPath, since constraints allow for the provision of a human readable message associated with the regex'
The code 'CASESBJ' is not valid in the system http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass (Unknown code 'CASESBJ' in the CodeSystem 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass' version '3.1.0')
The code 'CASESBJ' is not valid in the system http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass (Unknown code 'CASESBJ' in the CodeSystem 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass' version '3.1.0')
The code 'CASESBJ' is not valid in the system http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass (Unknown code 'CASESBJ' in the CodeSystem 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass' version '3.1.0')
The code 'CASESBJ' is not valid in the system http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass (Unknown code 'CASESBJ' in the CodeSystem 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-RoleClass' version '3.1.0')