FHIR CI-Build

This is the Continuous Integration Build of FHIR (will be incorrect/inconsistent at times).
See the Directory of published versions icon

14.8 Resource ArtifactAssessment - Content

Clinical Decision Support icon Work GroupMaturity Level: 0 Trial UseSecurity Category: Not Classified Compartments: Not linked to any defined compartments

This Resource provides one or more comments, classifiers or ratings about a Resource and supports attribution and rights management metadata for the added content.

The ArtifactAssessment Resource represents one or more assessments of another record or resource. The resource captures metadata about the assessment, as well as the data for the results of the assessment which might include comments, classifications, ratings, questions, and responses.

The ArtifactAssessment Resource provides a structure to communicate judgments or qualitative data about a record (a resource or other set of data with a known identity or URL by which it can be accessed), including comments, corrections, classifications, and ratings. The ArtifactAssessment Resource is used when the content attribution and management rights differ from the record being commented upon, or the commenter desires to separate the comments from the target record. The scope is intended to cover assessments (added information) regarding clinical records about individual human subjects, assessments (added information) regarding healthcare provision for individual persons (such as care plans), and assessments (added information) regarding records related to community knowledge such as scientific evidence and group-oriented guidance.

ArtifactAssessment may by referenced by ArtifactAssessment and by Task.

ArtifactAssessment may reference any resource of 'community knowledge' and will likely reference Evidence, EvidenceVariable, EvidenceReport, PlanDefinition, ActivityDefinition, Library, Measure, and Citation. ArtifactAssessment may reference any resource of a 'medical record' and will likely reference DocumentReference, Composition, CarePlan, and DiagnosticReport.

ArtifactAssessment is about the content of a Resource and not about the provenance of the Resource so should not be confused with Provenance.

ArtifactAssessment is not used for communications that are not about a Resource so should not be confused with Communication or Composition (or profiles of Composition) which may be used for the primary communication about the subject matter.

Observation Resource is used extensively for observations about people, groups, devices, locations, substances, and procedures – not about the record describing these entities. ArtifiactAssessment is used for observations where the subject is the artifact or record, not the entity described by the artifact. Simple "assessments" about an Observation such as status, dataAbsentReason, interpretation and note would use the Observation Resource where this is already structured. ArtifactAssessment Resource may be used for complex assessments of an Observation such as justifications for reasons to correct the record.

Across healthcare communities, there are an extensive number of comments and corrections regarding resources where the commenter is not able or permitted to modify the resource content, and there are many situations in which assessments with classifications and ratings of medical record content are made by parties who would not include the assessments in the medical record. Across the academic, scientific, quality measurement development, and clinical decision support communities there is an extensive need to report assessments and feedback about resources and records. These artifact assessments may take multiple forms (including text, classifications, ratings or measurements) and might or might not be created, queried and maintained independently from the artifact being rated or commented upon.

Structure

NameFlagsCard.TypeDescription & Constraintsdoco
.. ArtifactAssessment TUDomainResourceAdds metadata-supported comments, classifiers or ratings related to a Resource

Elements defined in Ancestors: id, meta, implicitRules, language, text, contained, extension, modifierExtension
... identifier Σ0..*IdentifierAdditional identifier for the artifact assessment

... citeAs[x] 0..1How to cite the comment or rating
.... citeAsReferenceReference(Citation)
.... citeAsMarkdownmarkdown
... date Σ0..1dateTimeDate last changed
... approvalDate 0..1dateWhen the artifact assessment was approved by publisher
... lastReviewDate Σ0..1dateWhen the artifact assessment was last reviewed
... artifact[x] Σ1..1The artifact assessed, commented upon or rated
.... artifactReferenceReference(Any)
.... artifactCanonicalcanonical()
.... artifactUriuri
... content 0..*BackboneElementComment, classifier, or rating content

.... informationType 0..1codecomment | classifier | rating | container | response | change-request
Artifact Assessment Information Type (Required)
.... summary 0..1markdownBrief summary of the content
.... type 0..1CodeableConceptWhat type of content
EvidenceCertaintyType (Example)
.... classifier 0..*CodeableConceptRating, classifier, or assessment
EvidenceCertaintyRating (Example)

.... author 0..1Reference(Patient | Practitioner | PractitionerRole | Organization | Device)Who authored the content
.... path 0..*uriWhat the comment is directed to

.... relatedArtifact 0..*RelatedArtifactAdditional information

.... freeToShare 0..1booleanAcceptable to publicly share the resource content
.... component 0..*see contentContained content

... workflowStatus Σ0..1codesubmitted | triaged | waiting-for-input | resolved-no-change | resolved-change-required | deferred | duplicate | applied | published
Artifact Assessment Workflow Status (Required)
... disposition Σ0..1codeunresolved | not-persuasive | persuasive | persuasive-with-modification | not-persuasive-with-modification
Artifact Assessment Disposition (Required)

doco Documentation for this format

See the Extensions for this resource

UML Diagram (Legend)

ArtifactAssessment (DomainResource)A formal identifier that is used to identify this artifact assessment when it is represented in other formats, or referenced in a specification, model, design or an instanceidentifier : Identifier [0..*]Display of or reference to the bibliographic citation of the comment, classifier, or ratingciteAs[x] : DataType [0..1] « Reference(Citation)|markdown »The date (and optionally time) when the artifact assessment was published. The date must change when the disposition changes and it must change if the workflow status code changes. In addition, it should change when the substantive content of the artifact assessment changesdate : dateTime [0..1]A copyright statement relating to the artifact assessment and/or its contents. Copyright statements are generally legal restrictions on the use and publishing of the artifact assessmentcopyright : markdown [0..1]The date on which the resource content was approved by the publisher. Approval happens once when the content is officially approved for usageapprovalDate : date [0..1]The date on which the resource content was last reviewed. Review happens periodically after approval but does not change the original approval datelastReviewDate : date [0..1]A reference to a resource, canonical resource, or non-FHIR resource which the comment or assessment is aboutartifact[x] : DataType [1..1] « Reference(Any)|canonical|uri »Indicates the workflow status of the comment or change requestworkflowStatus : code [0..1] « null (Strength=Required)ArtifactAssessmentWorkflowSta...! »Indicates the disposition of the responsible party to the comment or change requestdisposition : code [0..1] « null (Strength=Required)ArtifactAssessmentDisposition! »ContentThe type of information this component of the content representsinformationType : code [0..1] « null (Strength=Required)ArtifactAssessmentInformation...! »A brief summary of the content of this componentsummary : markdown [0..1]Indicates what type of content this component representstype : CodeableConcept [0..1] « null (Strength=Example)EvidenceCertaintyType?? »Represents a rating, classifier, or assessment of the artifactclassifier : CodeableConcept [0..*] « null (Strength=Example)EvidenceCertaintyRating?? »Indicates who or what authored the contentauthor : Reference [0..1] « Patient|Practitioner|PractitionerRole| Organization|Device »A URI that points to what the comment is about, such as a line of text in the CQL, or a specific element in a resourcepath : uri [0..*]Additional related artifacts that provide supporting documentation, additional evidence, or further information related to the contentrelatedArtifact : RelatedArtifact [0..*]Acceptable to publicly share the comment, classifier or ratingfreeToShare : boolean [0..1]If the informationType is container, the components of the contentcomponent[0..*]A component comment, classifier, or rating of the artifactcontent[0..*]

XML Template

<ArtifactAssessment xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> doco
 <!-- from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language -->
 <!-- from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension -->
 <identifier><!-- 0..* Identifier Additional identifier for the artifact assessment --></identifier>
 <citeAs[x]><!-- 0..1 Reference(Citation)|markdown How to cite the comment or rating --></citeAs[x]>
 <date value="[dateTime]"/><!-- 0..1 Date last changed -->
 <copyright value="[markdown]"/><!-- 0..1 Use and/or publishing restrictions -->
 <approvalDate value="[date]"/><!-- 0..1 When the artifact assessment was approved by publisher -->
 <lastReviewDate value="[date]"/><!-- 0..1 When the artifact assessment was last reviewed -->
 <artifact[x]><!-- 1..1 Reference(Any)|canonical|uri The artifact assessed, commented upon or rated --></artifact[x]>
 <content>  <!-- 0..* Comment, classifier, or rating content -->
  <informationType value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 comment | classifier | rating | container | response | change-request -->
  <summary value="[markdown]"/><!-- 0..1 Brief summary of the content -->
  <type><!-- 0..1 CodeableConcept What type of content --></type>
  <classifier><!-- 0..* CodeableConcept Rating, classifier, or assessment --></classifier>
  <author><!-- 0..1 Reference(Device|Organization|Patient|Practitioner|
    PractitionerRole) Who authored the content --></author>
  <path value="[uri]"/><!-- 0..* What the comment is directed to -->
  <relatedArtifact><!-- 0..* RelatedArtifact Additional information --></relatedArtifact>
  <freeToShare value="[boolean]"/><!-- 0..1 Acceptable to publicly share the resource content -->
  <component><!-- 0..* Content as for ArtifactAssessment.content Contained content --></component>
 </content>
 <workflowStatus value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 submitted | triaged | waiting-for-input | resolved-no-change | resolved-change-required | deferred | duplicate | applied | published -->
 <disposition value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 unresolved | not-persuasive | persuasive | persuasive-with-modification | not-persuasive-with-modification -->
</ArtifactAssessment>

JSON Template

{doco
  "resourceType" : "ArtifactAssessment",
  // from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language
  // from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension
  "identifier" : [{ Identifier }], // Additional identifier for the artifact assessment
  // citeAs[x]: How to cite the comment or rating. One of these 2:
  "citeAsReference" : { Reference(Citation) },
  "citeAsMarkdown" : "<markdown>",
  "date" : "<dateTime>", // Date last changed
  "copyright" : "<markdown>", // Use and/or publishing restrictions
  "approvalDate" : "<date>", // When the artifact assessment was approved by publisher
  "lastReviewDate" : "<date>", // When the artifact assessment was last reviewed
  // artifact[x]: The artifact assessed, commented upon or rated. One of these 3:
  "artifactReference" : { Reference(Any) },
  "artifactCanonical" : "<canonical>",
  "artifactUri" : "<uri>",
  "content" : [{ // Comment, classifier, or rating content
    "informationType" : "<code>", // comment | classifier | rating | container | response | change-request
    "summary" : "<markdown>", // Brief summary of the content
    "type" : { CodeableConcept }, // What type of content
    "classifier" : [{ CodeableConcept }], // Rating, classifier, or assessment
    "author" : { Reference(Device|Organization|Patient|Practitioner|
    PractitionerRole) }, // Who authored the content
    "path" : ["<uri>"], // What the comment is directed to
    "relatedArtifact" : [{ RelatedArtifact }], // Additional information
    "freeToShare" : <boolean>, // Acceptable to publicly share the resource content
    "component" : [{ Content as for ArtifactAssessment.content }] // Contained content
  }],
  "workflowStatus" : "<code>", // submitted | triaged | waiting-for-input | resolved-no-change | resolved-change-required | deferred | duplicate | applied | published
  "disposition" : "<code>" // unresolved | not-persuasive | persuasive | persuasive-with-modification | not-persuasive-with-modification
}

Turtle Template

@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> .doco


[ a fhir:ArtifactAssessment;
  fhir:nodeRole fhir:treeRoot; # if this is the parser root

  # from Resource: .id, .meta, .implicitRules, and .language
  # from DomainResource: .text, .contained, .extension, and .modifierExtension
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.identifier [ Identifier ], ... ; # 0..* Additional identifier for the artifact assessment
  # ArtifactAssessment.citeAs[x] : 0..1 How to cite the comment or rating. One of these 2
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.citeAsReference [ Reference(Citation) ]
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.citeAsMarkdown [ markdown ]
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.date [ dateTime ]; # 0..1 Date last changed
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.copyright [ markdown ]; # 0..1 Use and/or publishing restrictions
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.approvalDate [ date ]; # 0..1 When the artifact assessment was approved by publisher
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.lastReviewDate [ date ]; # 0..1 When the artifact assessment was last reviewed
  # ArtifactAssessment.artifact[x] : 1..1 The artifact assessed, commented upon or rated. One of these 3
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.artifactReference [ Reference(Any) ]
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.artifactCanonical [ canonical ]
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.artifactUri [ uri ]
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content [ # 0..* Comment, classifier, or rating content
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.informationType [ code ]; # 0..1 comment | classifier | rating | container | response | change-request
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.summary [ markdown ]; # 0..1 Brief summary of the content
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.type [ CodeableConcept ]; # 0..1 What type of content
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.classifier [ CodeableConcept ], ... ; # 0..* Rating, classifier, or assessment
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.author [ Reference(Device|Organization|Patient|Practitioner|PractitionerRole) ]; # 0..1 Who authored the content
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.path [ uri ], ... ; # 0..* What the comment is directed to
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.relatedArtifact [ RelatedArtifact ], ... ; # 0..* Additional information
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.freeToShare [ boolean ]; # 0..1 Acceptable to publicly share the resource content
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.component [ See ArtifactAssessment.content ], ... ; # 0..* Contained content
  ], ...;
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.workflowStatus [ code ]; # 0..1 submitted | triaged | waiting-for-input | resolved-no-change | resolved-change-required | deferred | duplicate | applied | published
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.disposition [ code ]; # 0..1 unresolved | not-persuasive | persuasive | persuasive-with-modification | not-persuasive-with-modification
]

Changes since R4

This resource did not exist in Release 3

This analysis is available as XML or JSON.

Structure

NameFlagsCard.TypeDescription & Constraintsdoco
.. ArtifactAssessment TUDomainResourceAdds metadata-supported comments, classifiers or ratings related to a Resource

Elements defined in Ancestors: id, meta, implicitRules, language, text, contained, extension, modifierExtension
... identifier Σ0..*IdentifierAdditional identifier for the artifact assessment

... citeAs[x] 0..1How to cite the comment or rating
.... citeAsReferenceReference(Citation)
.... citeAsMarkdownmarkdown
... date Σ0..1dateTimeDate last changed
... approvalDate 0..1dateWhen the artifact assessment was approved by publisher
... lastReviewDate Σ0..1dateWhen the artifact assessment was last reviewed
... artifact[x] Σ1..1The artifact assessed, commented upon or rated
.... artifactReferenceReference(Any)
.... artifactCanonicalcanonical()
.... artifactUriuri
... content 0..*BackboneElementComment, classifier, or rating content

.... informationType 0..1codecomment | classifier | rating | container | response | change-request
Artifact Assessment Information Type (Required)
.... summary 0..1markdownBrief summary of the content
.... type 0..1CodeableConceptWhat type of content
EvidenceCertaintyType (Example)
.... classifier 0..*CodeableConceptRating, classifier, or assessment
EvidenceCertaintyRating (Example)

.... author 0..1Reference(Patient | Practitioner | PractitionerRole | Organization | Device)Who authored the content
.... path 0..*uriWhat the comment is directed to

.... relatedArtifact 0..*RelatedArtifactAdditional information

.... freeToShare 0..1booleanAcceptable to publicly share the resource content
.... component 0..*see contentContained content

... workflowStatus Σ0..1codesubmitted | triaged | waiting-for-input | resolved-no-change | resolved-change-required | deferred | duplicate | applied | published
Artifact Assessment Workflow Status (Required)
... disposition Σ0..1codeunresolved | not-persuasive | persuasive | persuasive-with-modification | not-persuasive-with-modification
Artifact Assessment Disposition (Required)

doco Documentation for this format

See the Extensions for this resource

UML Diagram (Legend)

ArtifactAssessment (DomainResource)A formal identifier that is used to identify this artifact assessment when it is represented in other formats, or referenced in a specification, model, design or an instanceidentifier : Identifier [0..*]Display of or reference to the bibliographic citation of the comment, classifier, or ratingciteAs[x] : DataType [0..1] « Reference(Citation)|markdown »The date (and optionally time) when the artifact assessment was published. The date must change when the disposition changes and it must change if the workflow status code changes. In addition, it should change when the substantive content of the artifact assessment changesdate : dateTime [0..1]A copyright statement relating to the artifact assessment and/or its contents. Copyright statements are generally legal restrictions on the use and publishing of the artifact assessmentcopyright : markdown [0..1]The date on which the resource content was approved by the publisher. Approval happens once when the content is officially approved for usageapprovalDate : date [0..1]The date on which the resource content was last reviewed. Review happens periodically after approval but does not change the original approval datelastReviewDate : date [0..1]A reference to a resource, canonical resource, or non-FHIR resource which the comment or assessment is aboutartifact[x] : DataType [1..1] « Reference(Any)|canonical|uri »Indicates the workflow status of the comment or change requestworkflowStatus : code [0..1] « null (Strength=Required)ArtifactAssessmentWorkflowSta...! »Indicates the disposition of the responsible party to the comment or change requestdisposition : code [0..1] « null (Strength=Required)ArtifactAssessmentDisposition! »ContentThe type of information this component of the content representsinformationType : code [0..1] « null (Strength=Required)ArtifactAssessmentInformation...! »A brief summary of the content of this componentsummary : markdown [0..1]Indicates what type of content this component representstype : CodeableConcept [0..1] « null (Strength=Example)EvidenceCertaintyType?? »Represents a rating, classifier, or assessment of the artifactclassifier : CodeableConcept [0..*] « null (Strength=Example)EvidenceCertaintyRating?? »Indicates who or what authored the contentauthor : Reference [0..1] « Patient|Practitioner|PractitionerRole| Organization|Device »A URI that points to what the comment is about, such as a line of text in the CQL, or a specific element in a resourcepath : uri [0..*]Additional related artifacts that provide supporting documentation, additional evidence, or further information related to the contentrelatedArtifact : RelatedArtifact [0..*]Acceptable to publicly share the comment, classifier or ratingfreeToShare : boolean [0..1]If the informationType is container, the components of the contentcomponent[0..*]A component comment, classifier, or rating of the artifactcontent[0..*]

XML Template

<ArtifactAssessment xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> doco
 <!-- from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language -->
 <!-- from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension -->
 <identifier><!-- 0..* Identifier Additional identifier for the artifact assessment --></identifier>
 <citeAs[x]><!-- 0..1 Reference(Citation)|markdown How to cite the comment or rating --></citeAs[x]>
 <date value="[dateTime]"/><!-- 0..1 Date last changed -->
 <copyright value="[markdown]"/><!-- 0..1 Use and/or publishing restrictions -->
 <approvalDate value="[date]"/><!-- 0..1 When the artifact assessment was approved by publisher -->
 <lastReviewDate value="[date]"/><!-- 0..1 When the artifact assessment was last reviewed -->
 <artifact[x]><!-- 1..1 Reference(Any)|canonical|uri The artifact assessed, commented upon or rated --></artifact[x]>
 <content>  <!-- 0..* Comment, classifier, or rating content -->
  <informationType value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 comment | classifier | rating | container | response | change-request -->
  <summary value="[markdown]"/><!-- 0..1 Brief summary of the content -->
  <type><!-- 0..1 CodeableConcept What type of content --></type>
  <classifier><!-- 0..* CodeableConcept Rating, classifier, or assessment --></classifier>
  <author><!-- 0..1 Reference(Device|Organization|Patient|Practitioner|
    PractitionerRole) Who authored the content --></author>
  <path value="[uri]"/><!-- 0..* What the comment is directed to -->
  <relatedArtifact><!-- 0..* RelatedArtifact Additional information --></relatedArtifact>
  <freeToShare value="[boolean]"/><!-- 0..1 Acceptable to publicly share the resource content -->
  <component><!-- 0..* Content as for ArtifactAssessment.content Contained content --></component>
 </content>
 <workflowStatus value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 submitted | triaged | waiting-for-input | resolved-no-change | resolved-change-required | deferred | duplicate | applied | published -->
 <disposition value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 unresolved | not-persuasive | persuasive | persuasive-with-modification | not-persuasive-with-modification -->
</ArtifactAssessment>

JSON Template

{doco
  "resourceType" : "ArtifactAssessment",
  // from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language
  // from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension
  "identifier" : [{ Identifier }], // Additional identifier for the artifact assessment
  // citeAs[x]: How to cite the comment or rating. One of these 2:
  "citeAsReference" : { Reference(Citation) },
  "citeAsMarkdown" : "<markdown>",
  "date" : "<dateTime>", // Date last changed
  "copyright" : "<markdown>", // Use and/or publishing restrictions
  "approvalDate" : "<date>", // When the artifact assessment was approved by publisher
  "lastReviewDate" : "<date>", // When the artifact assessment was last reviewed
  // artifact[x]: The artifact assessed, commented upon or rated. One of these 3:
  "artifactReference" : { Reference(Any) },
  "artifactCanonical" : "<canonical>",
  "artifactUri" : "<uri>",
  "content" : [{ // Comment, classifier, or rating content
    "informationType" : "<code>", // comment | classifier | rating | container | response | change-request
    "summary" : "<markdown>", // Brief summary of the content
    "type" : { CodeableConcept }, // What type of content
    "classifier" : [{ CodeableConcept }], // Rating, classifier, or assessment
    "author" : { Reference(Device|Organization|Patient|Practitioner|
    PractitionerRole) }, // Who authored the content
    "path" : ["<uri>"], // What the comment is directed to
    "relatedArtifact" : [{ RelatedArtifact }], // Additional information
    "freeToShare" : <boolean>, // Acceptable to publicly share the resource content
    "component" : [{ Content as for ArtifactAssessment.content }] // Contained content
  }],
  "workflowStatus" : "<code>", // submitted | triaged | waiting-for-input | resolved-no-change | resolved-change-required | deferred | duplicate | applied | published
  "disposition" : "<code>" // unresolved | not-persuasive | persuasive | persuasive-with-modification | not-persuasive-with-modification
}

Turtle Template

@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> .doco


[ a fhir:ArtifactAssessment;
  fhir:nodeRole fhir:treeRoot; # if this is the parser root

  # from Resource: .id, .meta, .implicitRules, and .language
  # from DomainResource: .text, .contained, .extension, and .modifierExtension
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.identifier [ Identifier ], ... ; # 0..* Additional identifier for the artifact assessment
  # ArtifactAssessment.citeAs[x] : 0..1 How to cite the comment or rating. One of these 2
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.citeAsReference [ Reference(Citation) ]
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.citeAsMarkdown [ markdown ]
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.date [ dateTime ]; # 0..1 Date last changed
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.copyright [ markdown ]; # 0..1 Use and/or publishing restrictions
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.approvalDate [ date ]; # 0..1 When the artifact assessment was approved by publisher
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.lastReviewDate [ date ]; # 0..1 When the artifact assessment was last reviewed
  # ArtifactAssessment.artifact[x] : 1..1 The artifact assessed, commented upon or rated. One of these 3
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.artifactReference [ Reference(Any) ]
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.artifactCanonical [ canonical ]
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.artifactUri [ uri ]
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content [ # 0..* Comment, classifier, or rating content
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.informationType [ code ]; # 0..1 comment | classifier | rating | container | response | change-request
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.summary [ markdown ]; # 0..1 Brief summary of the content
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.type [ CodeableConcept ]; # 0..1 What type of content
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.classifier [ CodeableConcept ], ... ; # 0..* Rating, classifier, or assessment
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.author [ Reference(Device|Organization|Patient|Practitioner|PractitionerRole) ]; # 0..1 Who authored the content
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.path [ uri ], ... ; # 0..* What the comment is directed to
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.relatedArtifact [ RelatedArtifact ], ... ; # 0..* Additional information
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.freeToShare [ boolean ]; # 0..1 Acceptable to publicly share the resource content
    fhir:ArtifactAssessment.content.component [ See ArtifactAssessment.content ], ... ; # 0..* Contained content
  ], ...;
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.workflowStatus [ code ]; # 0..1 submitted | triaged | waiting-for-input | resolved-no-change | resolved-change-required | deferred | duplicate | applied | published
  fhir:ArtifactAssessment.disposition [ code ]; # 0..1 unresolved | not-persuasive | persuasive | persuasive-with-modification | not-persuasive-with-modification
]

Changes since Release 4

This resource did not exist in Release 3

This analysis is available as XML or JSON.

 

Additional definitions: Master Definition XML + JSON, XML Schema/Schematron + JSON Schema, ShEx (for Turtle) + see the extensions, the spreadsheet version & the dependency analysis

PathDefinitionTypeReference
ArtifactAssessment.content.informationType

The type of information contained in a component of an artifact assessment.

RequiredArtifactAssessmentInformationType
ArtifactAssessment.content.type

The aspect of quality, confidence, or certainty.

ExampleEvidenceCertaintyType
ArtifactAssessment.content.classifier

The assessment of quality, confidence, or certainty.

ExampleEvidenceCertaintyRating
ArtifactAssessment.workflowStatus

Possible values for the workflow status of the comment or assessment, typically used to coordinate workflow around the process of accepting and rejecting changes and comments on the artifact.

RequiredArtifactAssessmentWorkflowStatus
ArtifactAssessment.disposition

Possible values for the disposition of a comment or change request, typically used for comments and change requests, to indicate the disposition of the responsible party towards the changes suggested by the comment or change request.

RequiredArtifactAssessmentDisposition

Search parameters for this resource. The common parameters also apply. See Searching for more information about searching in REST, messaging, and services.

NameTypeDescriptionExpressionIn Common
date NdateThe artifact assessment publication dateArtifactAssessment.date