Validation Results for GenomicsReporting

Generated Thu Dec 12 20:16:34 UTC 2024, FHIR version 4.0.1 for hl7.fhir.uv.genomics-reporting#3.0.0 (canonical = http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/genomics-reporting (history)). See Full QA Report

Quality Checks
Publisher Version:IG Publisher Version: v1.8.1
Publication Code:genomics-reporting . PackageId = hl7.fhir.uv.genomics-reporting, Canonical = http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/genomics-reporting
Realm Check for UV:
  • n/a
Publication Request:
package-idhl7.fhir.uv.genomics-reporting
version3.0.0
pathhttp://hl7.org/fhir/uv/genomics-reporting/STU3
Pub-Modemilestone
statustrial-use
Release-LabelSTU3
Sequence (Group)STU3 (current: 'STU 2', others = 'STU 1','STU 2','STU 3')
descSTU3 update of Genomics Reporting IG
descmd

STU3 update of Genomics Reporting IG

No Messages found - all good
Supressed Messages:89 Suppressed Issues
Dependency Checks:
PackageVersionFHIRCanonicalWeb BaseComment
.. hl7.fhir.uv.genomics-reporting3.0.0R4http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/genomics-reporting
... hl7.terminology.r46.1.0 MR4http://terminology.hl7.orghttp://terminology.hl7.org/6.1.0
... hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r45.1.0 MR4http://hl7.org/fhir/extensionshttp://hl7.org/fhir/extensions/5.1.0
Templates: hl7.fhir.template#0.10.1 -> hl7.base.template#0.10.1 -> fhir.base.template#0.8.1. Tools: 0.3.0
Dependent IGs:1 guide
Global Profiles:(none declared)
Terminology Server(s):http://tx.fhir.org/r4 (details)
HTA Analysis:All OK
R5 Dependencies:(none)
Draft Dependencies:
Modifier Extensions:(none)
Previous Version Comparison: Comparison with version 3.0.0-ballot
IPA Comparison: n/a
IPS Comparison: n/a
Validation Flags: On: autoLoad; Off: hintAboutNonMustSupport, anyExtensionsAllowed, checkAggregation, showReferenceMessages, noExperimentalContent, displayWarnings
Summary: errors = 0, warn = 0, info = 0, broken links = 0
FilenameErrorsWarningsHints
Build Errors000

n/a Show Validation Information

Suppressed Messages (Warnings, hints, broken links)

An example of DiagnosticImplication<Observation>.derivedFrom() that we slice to only allow our profiles. In this example, we did not define specific Variant instances and just refer to some variants by identifier (rather than a full resource), so ignoring these warnings

CG has reviewed these CodeSystems and have decided to keep this in our IG

Each of these codes have been validated (as of Jul 5 2024), so suppressing these warnings until HPO becomes a supported code system.

GenomicReport<DiagnosticReport>.result referencing Observation instances. We have defined our report profile to slice .result with our Observation profiles. Slicing is open, this informational message can be ignored

In several places we use experimental ValueSets with experimental bindings. The elements are marked as experimental. So we suppress the warning. See https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/channel/179252-IG-creation/topic/consent-content-code.20warning

Observation.component instances that do not match our slices, but is OK (and this is ok since we use open slicing)

Our Observation profiles require a code from the Observation Category value set (LAB), but in some cases require additional codes from other value sets. Since this binding is "Preferred" the resources are still conformant, so we are Suppressing these messages.

Suppress all references to example CodeSystems

The IG Validator returns different warnings on this error: https://github.com/HL7/fhir-ig-publisher/issues/420 - in short, the validator returns the "among choices" profiles in a different order different times.

The following code system are not discoverable because they are code systems in THO, but THO doesn't define the codes. They have been checked and the identifiers are correct

The mappings in this concept map have been human reviewed and is correct

These slice messages have been reviewed, and our StructureDefinition apporpriately defines the slices of extension, and examples look valid. Have asked for feedback here: https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179252-IG-creation/topic/slicing.20in.20Observation.2Ecomponent.2Eextension.20information.20help.3F

These slice messages that have been reviewed. Each of these refer to (via derivedFrom) a Variant, and are a valid Variant instance. They are similar to ones mentioned on https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179252-IG-creation/topic/slicing.20in.20Observation.2Ecomponent.2Eextension.20information.20help.3F

This code has been human reviewed and is correct

We define several experimental CodeSystems that we use, so OK to suppress this for all IG defined CSs, https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/channel/179202-terminology/topic/Overuse.20of.20the.20Experimental.20flag, https://confluence.hl7.org/x/LKOZCQ

Errors sorted by type