一組與健康照護相關的資訊，這些訊息被組合成一個單一的邏輯套件，提供一個單一的連貫的意義陳述，建立自己的上下文，並且提供有關於是誰做出陳述的臨床認證。

雖然此規範的重點在於特定於病人的臨床聲明，但此resource也可適用於其他與健康照護相關的聲明，如研究方案設計、醫療發票和其他不必然與特定於病人或臨床相關的活動。

關於resource的metadata。這是由基礎建設維護的內容。對內容的改變可能並不總是與resource的版本改變相關。

The version specific identifier, as it appears in the version portion of the URL. This value changes when the resource is created, updated, or deleted.

The server assigns this value, and ignores what the client specifies, except in the case that the server is imposing version integrity on updates/deletes.

構建resource時遵循的一系列規則的參照，在處理內容時必須理解這些規則。通常這是IG定義特殊規則及其他profiles的參照。

宣告這套規則限制了內容只能被有限的貿易夥伴所理解。這從本質上限制了資料的長期有用性。然而，現有的健康生態體系高度分裂，還沒有準備好以普遍可計算的方式定義、收集和交換資料。只要有可能，實作者和(或)規範編寫者應該避免使用這個資料項目。通常，在使用時，此URL是對實作指引的參照，此指引將這些特殊規則與其他profiles、value sets等一起定義為其敘述的一部分。

可以用來表示不屬於資料項目的基本定義的附加資訊，並且修改對它所內嵌(contained)的資料項目的理解和(或)對包含資料項目之後續使用的理解。通常，修飾用的資料項目提供否定或限定。為了使擴充的使用安全和可管理，對擴充的定義和使用有一套嚴格的管理。儘管任何實作者都可以定義一個擴充，但作為擴充定義的一部分，有一套要求 必須（SHALL） 滿足。處理resource的應用程式被要求檢查修飾用的擴充資料項目。
修飾用的擴充資料項目 必須沒有(SHALL NOT) 改變resource或DomainResource上任何資料項目的含義(包括不能改變modifierExtension本身的含義)。

無論使用或定義擴充的機構或管轄區，任何應用程式、專案或標準使用擴充都不背負任何污名(stigma)。使用擴充是允許FHIR規範為每個人保留一個核心的簡易性。

修飾用的資料項目擴充將不能安全地忽略的擴充與絕大多數可以安全地忽略的擴充明確區分開來。透過消除禁止實作者擴充存在的需求來促進可互操作性。更多訊息，請參見修飾用的資料項目擴充之定義。

與版本無關的Composition識別碼。隨著時間的推移，該識別碼將保持不變。

類似於 CDA 中的 ClinicalDocument/setId。請參閱resource定義中的討論，了解它們之間的關係。

The purpose of this identifier.

Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary.

Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known .

Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers.

A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.

A coded type for an identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.

The portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system.

If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.

Organization that issued/manages the identifier.

The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.

此composition的工作流程/臨床狀態。狀態是指文件的臨床狀態的標識。

如果一個composition被標記為撤回(withdraw)，那麼該系列中的composition/文件或者此composition或文件系列中的資料，若未被明確標記為(該撤回)不可信的情況下，則不應向用戶展示。「錯誤輸入 (entered-in-error)標籤是此composition為何被標記為修飾用資料項目(modifier)的原因。 某些報告工作流程要求最終文件的原始敘述永不更改；意即只能添加新的敘述。composition resource 沒有明確的狀態(status)來明確註明是否適用此業務規則。如有需要，這將透過擴充來處理。

Composition的工作流程/臨床狀態；應填入所綁定值集中的其中一個代碼。

需要能夠標記為臨時(interim)、修改(amended)或撤回(withdrawn)的composition或文件。

指定特定類型的composition（如病史和體檢、出院摘要、病程紀錄）。這通常等同於製作composition的目的。

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

應填入所綁定值集中適合的代碼，確定無適合的代碼才可以使用其他值集的代碼來表示。

描述composition的關鍵metadata資料項目，用於查詢/篩選。

composition是關於誰或什麼的。composition可以是關於一個人（病人或醫護人員）、一個設備（如機器），甚至是一群對象（如關於一群牲畜的文件，或一群有共同曝露的病人）。

對於臨床文件來說，這通常是指病人。

查詢composition的基本metadata，指明compoisition/文件的作者和/或內容。

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

描述與該文件相關的臨床就醫事件或照護類型。

為composition提供情境並支持查詢。

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

composition編輯時間，即作者最後一次邏輯上更改composition的時間。

composition上的最後修改日期可能在文件被證明日期之後而未更改。這意味著修改過的文件上的日期是修改日期，而非原始撰寫之日期。

dateTime 用於追蹤、組織版本和查詢。請注意：這是創作此版本Composition的時間。打包成文檔時，Bundle.timestamp 是打包日期。

指明誰對composition中的資訊負責，而不一定是誰輸入了它。

指明誰對內容負責

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

composition的正式可讀標籤

對於許多composition來說，標題與文本或 Composition.type 的顯示名稱相同（如 「會診﹙consultation﹚」或 「病程紀錄﹙progress note﹚」）。請注意：CDA 並不強制要求標題，但目前還沒有發現省略標題有用的情況，因此在此強制要求標題。歡迎在試用區間對這一要求提出反饋意見。

具體說明Composition保密等級的代碼

此資料項目的確切使用，以及與高度敏感文件相關的執行和問題超出了基本規範的範圍，並委託給實作Profiles（見安全小節）。 此資料項目被標記為修飾用，因為高度機密的文件不能被當作非機密文件處理。

應填入所綁定值集中的其中一個代碼。

證明composition/文件準確無誤的參與者

每位參與者只需每位證明者只列一次

指明對composition內容準確性的責任

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

認證者提供的認證類型

認證者提供的認證類型；應填入所綁定值集中的其中一個代碼。

指明認證的權威程度

誰以指定的方式證明了此composition

指明由誰承擔composition內容準確性的責任

指明負責持續維護和存取composition/文件資訊的機構或團體

當此文件是衍生自composition時非常有用。它提供了如何獲取文件的最新版本的指導。這是可選項，因為有時編寫系統並不知道可以根據情境推斷。不過，在處理派生文件時，了解這一資訊非常重要，因此鼓勵提供一個保管者。

指明在哪裡可以找到當前版本、在哪裡可以報告問題等

構成composition的各小節

Slicing Note: The rules on this element (including its children) apply to all the slices, but are not repeated in them

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

一個用於指明小節中所含內容種類的代碼，這個代碼必須與小節的標題相一致。

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

應填入所綁定值集中適合的代碼，確定無適合的代碼才可以使用其他值集的代碼來表示。

提供給文件中主題的標籤是標準化的，並且可以被電腦程式識別和處理。

指明誰對小節中的資訊負責，而不一定是誰輸入了它。

指明誰對內容負責

一個供人閱讀的敘述，包含小節的核實內容，用以展現resource的內容供人類閱讀。這段敘述不需要涵蓋所有結構化的資料，但必須包含足夠的細節，確保僅透過閱讀這段敘述的人能夠在臨床上獲得安全且準確的資訊。

文件Profile可能會定義應在敘述中呈現哪些內容，以確保臨床安全。

指向那些提供小節中敘述內容的實際resource的參照

如果清單中沒有條目，則 建議應該(SHOULD) 提供 emptyReason。

構成composition的各小節

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

此特定小節的標籤。這將是文件呈現內容的一部分，通常用於建立目錄。

標題為人類讀者指明小節。標題必須與作為 section.content 參照目標的resource的敘述一致。通常章節 建議應該(SHOULD) 有標題，但在某些文件中，這可能是不必要的或不適當的。通常情況下，當一個小節有其自己足夠區分的標題的子小節，或只有單一小節的文件時，就會這樣。大多數IG會要求小節標題是必填的資料項目。

不同類型的文件常常會有標準化的小節標題，這些標題為人們提供如何組織文件的指引。

一個用於指明小節中所含內容種類的代碼，這個代碼必須與小節的標題相一致。

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

應填入所綁定值集中適合的代碼，確定無適合的代碼才可以使用其他值集的代碼來表示。

提供給文件中主題的標籤是標準化的，並且可以被電腦程式識別和處理。

指明誰對小節中的資訊負責，而不一定是誰輸入了它。

指明誰對內容負責

一個供人閱讀的敘述，包含小節的核實內容，用以展現resource的內容供人類閱讀。這段敘述不需要涵蓋所有結構化的資料，但必須包含足夠的細節，確保僅透過閱讀這段敘述的人能夠在臨床上獲得安全且準確的資訊。

文件Profile可能會定義應在敘述中呈現哪些內容，以確保臨床安全。

指向那些提供小節中敘述內容的實際resource的參照

如果清單中沒有條目，則 建議應該(SHOULD) 提供 emptyReason。

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

構成composition的各小節

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

此特定小節的標籤。這將是文件呈現內容的一部分，通常用於建立目錄。

標題為人類讀者指明小節。標題必須與作為 section.content 參照目標的resource的敘述一致。通常章節 建議應該(SHOULD) 有標題，但在某些文件中，這可能是不必要的或不適當的。通常情況下，當一個小節有其自己足夠區分的標題的子小節，或只有單一小節的文件時，就會這樣。大多數IG會要求小節標題是必填的資料項目。

不同類型的文件常常會有標準化的小節標題，這些標題為人們提供如何組織文件的指引。

一個用於指明小節中所含內容種類的代碼，這個代碼必須與小節的標題相一致。

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

應填入所綁定值集中適合的代碼，確定無適合的代碼才可以使用其他值集的代碼來表示。

提供給文件中主題的標籤是標準化的，並且可以被電腦程式識別和處理。

指明誰對小節中的資訊負責，而不一定是誰輸入了它。

指明誰對內容負責

一個供人閱讀的敘述，包含小節的核實內容，用以展現resource的內容供人類閱讀。這段敘述不需要涵蓋所有結構化的資料，但必須包含足夠的細節，確保僅透過閱讀這段敘述的人能夠在臨床上獲得安全且準確的資訊。

文件Profile可能會定義應在敘述中呈現哪些內容，以確保臨床安全。

指向那些提供小節中敘述內容的實際resource的參照

如果清單中沒有條目，則 建議應該(SHOULD) 提供 emptyReason。

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

構成composition的各小節

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

此特定小節的標籤。這將是文件呈現內容的一部分，通常用於建立目錄。

標題為人類讀者指明小節。標題必須與作為 section.content 參照目標的resource的敘述一致。通常章節 建議應該(SHOULD) 有標題，但在某些文件中，這可能是不必要的或不適當的。通常情況下，當一個小節有其自己足夠區分的標題的子小節，或只有單一小節的文件時，就會這樣。大多數IG會要求小節標題是必填的資料項目。

不同類型的文件常常會有標準化的小節標題，這些標題為人們提供如何組織文件的指引。

一個用於指明小節中所含內容種類的代碼，這個代碼必須與小節的標題相一致。

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

應填入所綁定值集中適合的代碼，確定無適合的代碼才可以使用其他值集的代碼來表示。

提供給文件中主題的標籤是標準化的，並且可以被電腦程式識別和處理。

指明誰對小節中的資訊負責，而不一定是誰輸入了它。

指明誰對內容負責

一個供人閱讀的敘述，包含小節的核實內容，用以展現resource的內容供人類閱讀。這段敘述不需要涵蓋所有結構化的資料，但必須包含足夠的細節，確保僅透過閱讀這段敘述的人能夠在臨床上獲得安全且準確的資訊。

文件Profile可能會定義應在敘述中呈現哪些內容，以確保臨床安全。

指向那些提供小節中敘述內容的實際resource的參照

如果清單中沒有條目，則 建議應該(SHOULD) 提供 emptyReason。

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

構成composition的各小節

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

此特定小節的標籤。這將是文件呈現內容的一部分，通常用於建立目錄。

標題為人類讀者指明小節。標題必須與作為 section.content 參照目標的resource的敘述一致。通常章節 建議應該(SHOULD) 有標題，但在某些文件中，這可能是不必要的或不適當的。通常情況下，當一個小節有其自己足夠區分的標題的子小節，或只有單一小節的文件時，就會這樣。大多數IG會要求小節標題是必填的資料項目。

不同類型的文件常常會有標準化的小節標題，這些標題為人們提供如何組織文件的指引。

一個用於指明小節中所含內容種類的代碼，這個代碼必須與小節的標題相一致。

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

應填入所綁定值集中適合的代碼，確定無適合的代碼才可以使用其他值集的代碼來表示。

提供給文件中主題的標籤是標準化的，並且可以被電腦程式識別和處理。

指明誰對小節中的資訊負責，而不一定是誰輸入了它。

指明誰對內容負責

一個供人閱讀的敘述，包含小節的核實內容，用以展現resource的內容供人類閱讀。這段敘述不需要涵蓋所有結構化的資料，但必須包含足夠的細節，確保僅透過閱讀這段敘述的人能夠在臨床上獲得安全且準確的資訊。

文件Profile可能會定義應在敘述中呈現哪些內容，以確保臨床安全。

指向那些提供小節中敘述內容的實際resource的參照

如果清單中沒有條目，則 建議應該(SHOULD) 提供 emptyReason。

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

此小節中嵌套的小節

嵌套小節主要是為了幫助讀者快速找到文件中的特定內容

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

A code identifying the kind of content contained within the section. This must be consistent with the section title.

The code identifies the section for an automated processor of the document. This is particularly relevant when using profiles to control the structure of the document.

If the section has content (instead of sub-sections), the section.code does not change the meaning or interpretation of the resource that is the content of the section in the comments for the section.code.

Classification of a section of a composition/document.

Provides computable standardized labels to topics within the document.

A reference to the actual resource from which the narrative in the section is derived.

If there are no entries in the list, an emptyReason SHOULD be provided.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

構成composition的各小節

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

此特定小節的標籤。這將是文件呈現內容的一部分，通常用於建立目錄。

標題為人類讀者指明小節。標題必須與作為 section.content 參照目標的resource的敘述一致。通常章節 建議應該(SHOULD) 有標題，但在某些文件中，這可能是不必要的或不適當的。通常情況下，當一個小節有其自己足夠區分的標題的子小節，或只有單一小節的文件時，就會這樣。大多數IG會要求小節標題是必填的資料項目。

不同類型的文件常常會有標準化的小節標題，這些標題為人們提供如何組織文件的指引。

一個用於指明小節中所含內容種類的代碼，這個代碼必須與小節的標題相一致。

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

應填入所綁定值集中適合的代碼，確定無適合的代碼才可以使用其他值集的代碼來表示。

提供給文件中主題的標籤是標準化的，並且可以被電腦程式識別和處理。

指明誰對小節中的資訊負責，而不一定是誰輸入了它。

指明誰對內容負責

一個供人閱讀的敘述，包含小節的核實內容，用以展現resource的內容供人類閱讀。這段敘述不需要涵蓋所有結構化的資料，但必須包含足夠的細節，確保僅透過閱讀這段敘述的人能夠在臨床上獲得安全且準確的資訊。

文件Profile可能會定義應在敘述中呈現哪些內容，以確保臨床安全。

指向那些提供小節中敘述內容的實際resource的參照

如果清單中沒有條目，則 建議應該(SHOULD) 提供 emptyReason。

此小節中嵌套的小節

嵌套小節主要是為了幫助讀者快速找到文件中的特定內容

Slicing Note: The rules on this element (including its children) apply to all the slices, but are not repeated in them

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

一個用於指明小節中所含內容種類的代碼，這個代碼必須與小節的標題相一致。

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

應填入所綁定值集中適合的代碼，確定無適合的代碼才可以使用其他值集的代碼來表示。

提供給文件中主題的標籤是標準化的，並且可以被電腦程式識別和處理。

一個供人閱讀的敘述，包含小節的核實內容，用以展現resource的內容供人類閱讀。這段敘述不需要涵蓋所有結構化的資料，但必須包含足夠的細節，確保僅透過閱讀這段敘述的人能夠在臨床上獲得安全且準確的資訊。

文件Profile可能會定義應在敘述中呈現哪些內容，以確保臨床安全。

指向那些提供小節中敘述內容的實際resource的參照

如果清單中沒有條目，則 建議應該(SHOULD) 提供 emptyReason。

此小節中嵌套的小節

嵌套小節主要是為了幫助讀者快速找到文件中的特定內容

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

A code identifying the kind of content contained within the section. This must be consistent with the section title.

The code identifies the section for an automated processor of the document. This is particularly relevant when using profiles to control the structure of the document.

If the section has content (instead of sub-sections), the section.code does not change the meaning or interpretation of the resource that is the content of the section in the comments for the section.code.

Classification of a section of a composition/document.

Provides computable standardized labels to topics within the document.

A human-readable narrative that contains the attested content of the section, used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative.

Document profiles may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

A reference to the actual resource from which the narrative in the section is derived.

If there are no entries in the list, an emptyReason SHOULD be provided.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

此小節中嵌套的小節

嵌套小節主要是為了幫助讀者快速找到文件中的特定內容

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

A code identifying the kind of content contained within the section. This must be consistent with the section title.

The code identifies the section for an automated processor of the document. This is particularly relevant when using profiles to control the structure of the document.

If the section has content (instead of sub-sections), the section.code does not change the meaning or interpretation of the resource that is the content of the section in the comments for the section.code.

Classification of a section of a composition/document.

Provides computable standardized labels to topics within the document.

A human-readable narrative that contains the attested content of the section, used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative.

Document profiles may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

A reference to the actual resource from which the narrative in the section is derived.

If there are no entries in the list, an emptyReason SHOULD be provided.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

構成composition的各小節

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

此特定小節的標籤。這將是文件呈現內容的一部分，通常用於建立目錄。

標題為人類讀者指明小節。標題必須與作為 section.content 參照目標的resource的敘述一致。通常章節 建議應該(SHOULD) 有標題，但在某些文件中，這可能是不必要的或不適當的。通常情況下，當一個小節有其自己足夠區分的標題的子小節，或只有單一小節的文件時，就會這樣。大多數IG會要求小節標題是必填的資料項目。

不同類型的文件常常會有標準化的小節標題，這些標題為人們提供如何組織文件的指引。

一個用於指明小節中所含內容種類的代碼，這個代碼必須與小節的標題相一致。

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

應填入所綁定值集中適合的代碼，確定無適合的代碼才可以使用其他值集的代碼來表示。

提供給文件中主題的標籤是標準化的，並且可以被電腦程式識別和處理。

指明誰對小節中的資訊負責，而不一定是誰輸入了它。

指明誰對內容負責

一個供人閱讀的敘述，包含小節的核實內容，用以展現resource的內容供人類閱讀。這段敘述不需要涵蓋所有結構化的資料，但必須包含足夠的細節，確保僅透過閱讀這段敘述的人能夠在臨床上獲得安全且準確的資訊。

文件Profile可能會定義應在敘述中呈現哪些內容，以確保臨床安全。

指向那些提供小節中敘述內容的實際resource的參照

如果清單中沒有條目，則 建議應該(SHOULD) 提供 emptyReason。

此小節中嵌套的小節

嵌套小節主要是為了幫助讀者快速找到文件中的特定內容

Slicing Note: The rules on this element (including its children) apply to all the slices, but are not repeated in them

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

一個用於指明小節中所含內容種類的代碼，這個代碼必須與小節的標題相一致。

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

應填入所綁定值集中適合的代碼，確定無適合的代碼才可以使用其他值集的代碼來表示。

提供給文件中主題的標籤是標準化的，並且可以被電腦程式識別和處理。

一個供人閱讀的敘述，包含小節的核實內容，用以展現resource的內容供人類閱讀。這段敘述不需要涵蓋所有結構化的資料，但必須包含足夠的細節，確保僅透過閱讀這段敘述的人能夠在臨床上獲得安全且準確的資訊。

文件Profile可能會定義應在敘述中呈現哪些內容，以確保臨床安全。

指向那些提供小節中敘述內容的實際resource的參照

如果清單中沒有條目，則 建議應該(SHOULD) 提供 emptyReason。

此小節中嵌套的小節

嵌套小節主要是為了幫助讀者快速找到文件中的特定內容

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

A code identifying the kind of content contained within the section. This must be consistent with the section title.

The code identifies the section for an automated processor of the document. This is particularly relevant when using profiles to control the structure of the document.

If the section has content (instead of sub-sections), the section.code does not change the meaning or interpretation of the resource that is the content of the section in the comments for the section.code.

Classification of a section of a composition/document.

Provides computable standardized labels to topics within the document.

A human-readable narrative that contains the attested content of the section, used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative.

Document profiles may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

A reference to the actual resource from which the narrative in the section is derived.

If there are no entries in the list, an emptyReason SHOULD be provided.

Slicing Note: The rules on this element (including its children) apply to all the slices, but are not repeated in them

A reference to the actual resource from which the narrative in the section is derived.

If there are no entries in the list, an emptyReason SHOULD be provided.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

A reference to the actual resource from which the narrative in the section is derived.

If there are no entries in the list, an emptyReason SHOULD be provided.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

此小節中嵌套的小節

嵌套小節主要是為了幫助讀者快速找到文件中的特定內容

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

A code identifying the kind of content contained within the section. This must be consistent with the section title.

The code identifies the section for an automated processor of the document. This is particularly relevant when using profiles to control the structure of the document.

If the section has content (instead of sub-sections), the section.code does not change the meaning or interpretation of the resource that is the content of the section in the comments for the section.code.

Classification of a section of a composition/document.

Provides computable standardized labels to topics within the document.

A human-readable narrative that contains the attested content of the section, used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative.

Document profiles may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

A reference to the actual resource from which the narrative in the section is derived.

If there are no entries in the list, an emptyReason SHOULD be provided.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

構成composition的各小節

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.