Quality Measure Implementation Guide, published by HL7 International / Clinical Quality Information. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 6.0.0-ballot built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/HL7/cqf-measures/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions
Official URL: http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/cqm/StructureDefinition/cqfm-improvementNotation | Version: 4.0.0 | |||
Active as of 2024-11-19 | Computable Name: CQFMImprovementNotation |
Information on whether an increase or decrease in score is the preferred result (e.g., a higher score indicates better quality OR a lower score indicates better quality OR quality is within a range).
Additional Guidance: improvementNotation
Reference range
with definition of score within a defined interval (or a “passing score” over or under a certain threshold) indicates better quality to the improvement notation value set. Please provide comments on this additional code and if there are other codes needed in this value set.
Please provide comments on this additional code and if there are other codes needed in the improvement notation value set.
If an additional code is added to the improvement notation (like normative reference range as suggested), where is guidance about the reference range best included in the specification for implementer use? Some suggestions include: the guidance field, the rate aggregation field or adding an extension to improvementNotation to add text.
Purpose
Measure consumers and implementers must be able to determine how to interpret a measure score.
Context of Use
This extension may be used on the following element(s):
Usage info
Usage:
Description of Profiles, Differentials, Snapshots, and how the XML and JSON presentations work.
This structure is derived from Extension
Summary
Simple Extension of type CodeableConcept: Information on whether an increase or decrease in score is the preferred result (e.g., a higher score indicates better quality OR a lower score indicates better quality OR quality is within a range).
Additional Guidance: improvementNotation
Reference range
with definition of score within a defined interval (or a “passing score” over or under a certain threshold) indicates better quality to the improvement notation value set. Please provide comments on this additional code and if there are other codes needed in this value set.
Please provide comments on this additional code and if there are other codes needed in the improvement notation value set.
If an additional code is added to the improvement notation (like normative reference range as suggested), where is guidance about the reference range best included in the specification for implementer use? Some suggestions include: the guidance field, the rate aggregation field or adding an extension to improvementNotation to add text.
This structure is derived from Extension
Name | Flags | Card. | Type | Description & Constraints |
---|---|---|---|---|
Extension | 0..1 | Extension | increase | decrease | |
url | 1..1 | uri | "http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/cqm/StructureDefinition/cqfm-improvementNotation" | |
value[x] | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | Value of extension Binding: MeasureImprovementNotation (required): Indicates how to interpret the calculated score of the measure | |
Documentation for this format |
Name | Flags | Card. | Type | Description & Constraints |
---|---|---|---|---|
Extension | 0..1 | Extension | increase | decrease | |
id | 0..1 | string | Unique id for inter-element referencing | |
extension | 0..* | Extension | Additional content defined by implementations Slice: Unordered, Open by value:url | |
url | 1..1 | uri | "http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/cqm/StructureDefinition/cqfm-improvementNotation" | |
value[x] | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | Value of extension Binding: MeasureImprovementNotation (required): Indicates how to interpret the calculated score of the measure | |
Documentation for this format |
This structure is derived from Extension
Summary
Simple Extension of type CodeableConcept: Information on whether an increase or decrease in score is the preferred result (e.g., a higher score indicates better quality OR a lower score indicates better quality OR quality is within a range).
Additional Guidance: improvementNotation
Reference range
with definition of score within a defined interval (or a “passing score” over or under a certain threshold) indicates better quality to the improvement notation value set. Please provide comments on this additional code and if there are other codes needed in this value set.
Please provide comments on this additional code and if there are other codes needed in the improvement notation value set.
If an additional code is added to the improvement notation (like normative reference range as suggested), where is guidance about the reference range best included in the specification for implementer use? Some suggestions include: the guidance field, the rate aggregation field or adding an extension to improvementNotation to add text.
Differential View
This structure is derived from Extension
Name | Flags | Card. | Type | Description & Constraints |
---|---|---|---|---|
Extension | 0..1 | Extension | increase | decrease | |
url | 1..1 | uri | "http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/cqm/StructureDefinition/cqfm-improvementNotation" | |
value[x] | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | Value of extension Binding: MeasureImprovementNotation (required): Indicates how to interpret the calculated score of the measure | |
Documentation for this format |
Snapshot View
Name | Flags | Card. | Type | Description & Constraints |
---|---|---|---|---|
Extension | 0..1 | Extension | increase | decrease | |
id | 0..1 | string | Unique id for inter-element referencing | |
extension | 0..* | Extension | Additional content defined by implementations Slice: Unordered, Open by value:url | |
url | 1..1 | uri | "http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/cqm/StructureDefinition/cqfm-improvementNotation" | |
value[x] | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | Value of extension Binding: MeasureImprovementNotation (required): Indicates how to interpret the calculated score of the measure | |
Documentation for this format |
Other representations of profile: CSV, Excel, Schematron
Path | Conformance | ValueSet | URI |
Extension.value[x] | required | MeasureImprovementNotationhttp://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/measure-improvement-notation |
Id | Grade | Path(s) | Details | Requirements |
ele-1 | error | **ALL** elements | All FHIR elements must have a @value or children : hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count()) | |
ext-1 | error | **ALL** extensions | Must have either extensions or value[x], not both : extension.exists() != value.exists() |