Validation Results for IHE_ITI_MHD

Generated Mon Oct 06 18:44:11 UTC 2025, FHIR version 4.0.1 for ihe.iti.mhd#4.2.3-current (canonical = https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/MHD (history)). See Full QA Report & IP

Quality Checks
Publisher Version:IG Publisher Version: v2.0.19
Publication Code:n/a . PackageId = ihe.iti.mhd, Canonical = https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/MHD
Realm Check for n/a:
  • n/a
Language Info:This IG has no language information
Publication Request:
RelatedIgs(None Found)
  • Publication Request is for v'4.2.2' but package version is v4.2.3-current
  • Publication Request is for version v4.2.2 which is already published
  • Dependency on ihe.iti.balp is to the current version - not allowed
Supressed Messages:31 Suppressed Issues
Dependency Checks:
PackageVersionFHIRCanonicalWeb BaseComment
.. ihe.iti.mhd4.2.3-currentR4https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/MHD
... hl7.terminology.r46.5.0 MR4http://terminology.hl7.orghttp://terminology.hl7.org/6.5.0
.... hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r45.2.0 MR4http://hl7.org/fhir/extensionshttp://hl7.org/fhir/extensions/5.2.0
... hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r45.2.0 MR4http://hl7.org/fhir/extensionshttp://hl7.org/fhir/extensions/5.2.0 (as above)
... ihe.iti.balp1.1.4-current VR4https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/BALPhttps://build.fhir.org/ig/IHE/ITI.BasicAudit/Matched to latest patch release (current->1.1.4-current)
.... hl7.terminology.r46.5.0 MR4http://terminology.hl7.orghttp://terminology.hl7.org/6.5.0 (as above)
.... hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r45.2.0 MR4http://hl7.org/fhir/extensionshttp://hl7.org/fhir/extensions/5.2.0 (as above)
... ihe.formatcode.fhir1.4.0 MR4https://profiles.ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhirhttps://profiles.ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/1.4.0Matched to latest patch release (1.4.x->1.4.0)
.... hl7.terminology.r46.3.0 OR4http://terminology.hl7.orghttp://terminology.hl7.org/6.3.0Latest Release is 6.5.0
..... hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r45.2.0 MR4http://hl7.org/fhir/extensionshttp://hl7.org/fhir/extensions/5.2.0 (as above)
.... hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r45.2.0 MR4http://hl7.org/fhir/extensionshttp://hl7.org/fhir/extensions/5.2.0 (as above)
... hl7.fhir.uv.tools.r40.8.0 MR4http://hl7.org/fhir/toolshttp://hl7.org/fhir/tools/0.8.0Internal Dependency
Templates: ihe.fhir.template#1.0.0 -> fhir.base.template#1.0.0
Related IGs:n/a
Dependent IGs:no references
Global Profiles:(none declared)
Terminology Server(s):http://tx.fhir.org/r4, https://tx.fhir.org/r4 (details)
HTA Analysis:Non-HL7 Igs are exempt from terminology dependency analysis
R5 Dependencies:(none)
Draft Dependencies:
Modifier Extensions:(none)
Previous Version Comparison: Comparison with version 4.2.2
IPA Comparison: n/a
IPS Comparison: n/a
Validation Flags: On: autoLoad; Off: hintAboutNonMustSupport, anyExtensionsAllowed, checkAggregation, showReferenceMessages, noExperimentalContent, displayWarnings
Summary: errors = 0, warn = 0, info = 0, broken links = 3, pinned = n/a.
FilenameErrorsWarningsHints
Build Errors300

n/a Show Validation Information

32_fhir_maps​.html​#​/html​/body​/div​/div​/div​/div​/div​/p​/a at Line 278, column 20errorThe link 'StructureDefinition-IHE.MHD.Minimal.DocumentReference-mappings.html#mappings-for-xds-and-mhd-mapping-urn-ihe-iti-xds-documententry' for "mapping of the metadata elements" cannot be resolved (valid targets: 95 targets) HTML_LINK_CHECK_FAILED
32_fhir_maps​.html​#​/html​/body​/div​/div​/div​/div​/div​/p​/a at Line 299, column 20errorThe link 'StructureDefinition-IHE.MHD.Minimal.SubmissionSet-mappings.html#mappings-for-xds-and-mhd-mapping-urn-ihe-iti-xds-submissionset' for "mapping of the metadata elements" cannot be resolved (valid targets: 70 targets) HTML_LINK_CHECK_FAILED
32_fhir_maps​.html​#​/html​/body​/div​/div​/div​/div​/div​/p​/a at Line 316, column 20errorThe link 'StructureDefinition-IHE.MHD.Minimal.Folder-mappings.html#mappings-for-xds-and-mhd-mapping-urn-ihe-iti-xds-folder' for "mapping of the metadata elements" cannot be resolved (valid targets: 61 targets) HTML_LINK_CHECK_FAILED

Suppressed Messages (Warnings, hints, broken links)

FHIR R4 had the valueset setup wrong. We are using the proper system value

IHE code system used but never defined by IHE as a formal codeSystem

The concept map is from EB-Registry defined values, so we are using rfc3986. not a problem the source checking isn't done

The concept map is from a conceptual valueset from IHE, so there is no formal definition. not a problem the source checking isn't done

YES we know some examples use old codes. That old code use is not important to the example use

YES we want to point informatively at MHDS and NOT to have a dependency.

borrowed Document Bundle has issues that we don't care about (note removed signature as that threw errors)

comes from core. Not anything we can document

profile for MHD that is just structural and thus has no examples

some examples are underpopulated, the full population is not important for the use-case being explained

these are all examples that are good enough

we don't need to pin the version of these

yes we know we are using non normative resources and valuesets

Errors sorted by type