Da Vinci Risk Adjustment Implementation Guide, published by HL7 International / Clinical Quality Information. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 2.0.0 built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/HL7/davinci-ra/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions
Page standards status: Informative |
During this phase of the lifecycle process, the Payer determines if there is grounds for thinking that a patient may have a risk-adjustable condition that has not yet been documented during the current clinical evaluation period. Quality measures have clear rules governing when the patient is included in/excluded from the measure denominator and numerator; not so for risk adjustment. Payers often must statistically infer the likelihood that a patient might have an undocumented Condition Category (CC). This statistical process is called Condition Category (CC) suspecting and is generally done in two ways:
Alternatively, the Payer may receive a medical claim that confirms the presence of a previously unsuspected risk adjusted condition. Since this most often happens when a condition has been diagnosed for the first time, these are referred to as net-new conditions.
During the gap generation phase, the Payer combines all relevant data streams and determines which CC gaps exist for the patient and what their status is. An open gap is one where the Payer is soliciting information from the Provider that the patient either has the condition, or that the gap is invalid. A closed gap is one where the Payer has the necessary evidence that the gap is valid for the current clinical evaluation period. But because the CC suspecting process is probabilistic there will always be a certain percentage of invalid gaps that the Provider indicates are not clinically appropriate for the patient. Additionally, the gaps state of pending may be used when a payer receives a gap closure request and is working on confirming that closure; the pending state is discussed further in the Submit Data to Payer section.
Many risk adjustment models are constructed in such a way as to differentiate between different degrees of severity in the disease process. For example, the Medicare Advantage model v24 divides diabetes into three condition categories, which in order from least to most severe are: CC 19 (diabetes without complications); CC 18 (diabetes with chronic complications); and CC 17 (diabetes with acute complications.) During the clinical evaluation period a patient may be diagnosed with diabetes several times, with individual diagnoses rolling up to different Condition Categories (CCs). To avoid paying twice for the same underlying condition, a hierarchy is applied to the CCs so that only the most severe form is counted for risk adjustment purposes; applying these hierarchies turns a CC into a Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC). In the previous example, CC 17 supersedes CCs 18 and 19, and CC 18 supersedes CC 19.
There are many potential uses for CC gap information. For example, a provider may seek to take action on open gaps, or they may want confirmation of their previous gap closure or gap invalidation actions from the payer, or they may want to calculate their gap closure performance under the terms of a value-based payment arrangement. In general, the Payer will not know in advance which of these purposes the data will be used for, so the approach that has been taken in this implementation guide (IG) is for the Payer to provide as much CC gap data as possible, with flags on the data so that the Provider may filter the CC gaps on the receiving end. This makes it possible for the IG to support as broad a range of applications as possible. Data filtering is the responsibility of the recipient.
To summarize: the ccType of a CC gap may be historic, suspected, or net-new; its evidenceStatus may be open-gap, closed-gap, pending, or invalid; and its hierarchicalStatus may be applied-superseded, applied-not-superseded, not-applied, or not-applicable (e.g., if the model is non-hierarchical.) These three flags can be used to facilitate data filtering by the requester.
Once the CC gaps have been identified and their filtering flags are set, the next task is to put them into a FHIR MeasureReport. This IG provides two approaches to do this.
This IG includes a section describing Digital Condition Categories (dCC). As work continues on dCC’s, the approach for generating reports used there may be used in parallel. For example, a payer organization might use dCCs for evaluating diabetes, heart disease, heart failure, and COPD, with all the other CCs evaluated through Risk Adjustment Coder (e.g., Certified Risk Adjustment Coder (CRC)). This means that some means must be provided for generating a single combined MeasureReport containing CC gaps from different input streams: the diabetes CC gaps might come from dCCs, while other CC gaps might come from SAS datasets or the like. In future state as dCCs become available, a MeasureReport may result from the merger of the Assisted and Generated, as well as the Evaluated data stream method used in dCC. In this way a MeasureReport will contain a holistic view of a patient’s CC gaps, no matter where those gaps originated.
Once all MeasureReports have been created, a query can be run for one or more Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Reports for a single patient or group of patients. This query can be run by either the Provider to pull the report to their system, or it can be run by the Payer and pushed/posted to the Provider’s system.
The Actors involved in coding gap report generation are defined as the Payer and the Provider:
In the example shown in Figure 2.2-1, a Payer plays the role both as Reporting Server and Reporting Client in this scenario. The Payer (acting as the Reporting Client) queries the Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report on their Reporting Server based on the search parameters provided. Then the Payer POSTs the searchset Bundle to the Provider.
As shown in Figure 2.2-2, the Provider playing the role of the Reporting Client queries the Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report on the Payer’s Reporting Server with search parameters. The Payer’s Reporting Server returns the Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report and the evaluated Resources to the Provider.
The Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report is used to represent a coding gap report for a single patient and a version specific risk adjustment model. The required MeasureReport.subject
references US Core Patient and the required MeasureReport.measure
element references the Risk Adjustment Model Measure. The Risk Adjustment Model Measure profile specifies risk adjustment model information, which requires both a model identifier and a version. If the Server’s risk adjustment engine runs multiple risk adjustment models including different versions of the same model, then there will be multiple Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Reports for a patient. For example, if a risk adjustment engine runs reports using CMS-HCC V25, CMS-HCC V24, and Rx-HCC V5, then there will be three separate Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Reports for the patient, each for a version specific risk adjustment model.
The [MeasureReport] resource has zero to many group
elements. Each group
element contains information for a Condition Category (CC), therefore, each MeasureReport may contain multiple Condition Category (CC) codes. The group.code
is used to represent the actual code for a Condition Category (CC), such as HCC 18 (Diabetes with No Complication). The Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report profile adds several extensions to the MeasureReport resource’s group
element to provide additional information about a Condition Category (CC), including:
In addition, the Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report provides the capability of sharing supporting evidence for a Condition Category (CC) through the use of the MeasureReport.evaluatedResource
element. This supporting evidence may include resources for data such as encounters, lab results, medications, and procedures, and the evaluatedResource
shall reference the appropriate US Core profile. The extension ra-groupReference added to the evaluatedResource
element enables tying a specific supporting evidence to a Condition Category (CC). This is accomplished by setting the extension’s valueString
to be the same value of the MeasureGroup.group.id
of the Condition Category (CC) to establish the association between the supporting evidence and one or more Condition Categories.
Figure 2.2-3 is an example of how a Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report might be displayed. The Provider queries for the Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Reports for patient Eve Everywoman (subject
) and for a clinical evaluation period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 (periodStart
and periodEnd
). The Payer receives the request and finds a matching risk adjustment coding gap report for Eve Everywoman that has a clinical evaluation period of January 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021, which overlaps the periodStart
and periodEnd
dates provided in the query - see Report Query. This report was generated on October 18th, 2021 using the risk adjustment model CMS-HCC V24. As shown in this example report, Eve Everywoman has five Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs). Three of the HCCs are historic diagnoses and two are suspected diagnoses. For example, one of the historic diagnoses is HCC 18 (Diabetes with no Complications). The status of this coding gap is shown as closed and the evidence status date is April 1, 2021. The supporting evidence field shows the clinical data that was used to close the coding gap HCC 18.
The following resources and their profiles specified in this IG are used to support sharing Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Reports between the Payer and the Provider:
Resource Type | Profile Name | Link to Profile |
---|---|---|
Group | Patient Group Profile | Patient Group |
MeasureReport | Risk Adjustment Coding Gap MeasureReport | Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report |
Measure | Risk Adjustment Model Measure | Risk Adjustment Model Measure |
Figure 2.2-4 provides a graphical view of how these resources are related to the example report above for some of the Condition Categories on the report. The main resource is the Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report profile. This coding gap report references a Risk Adjustment Model Measure, which indicates CMS-HCC V24 is the risk adjustment model this report is based on. The coding gap report also references the Patient (US Core Patient) as well as the Organization (US Core Organization) that generated the report. The graph shows three groups within a Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report using three example HCCs from Figure 2.2-3 to illustrate how each group
corresponds to an HCC including its attributes. Note that the Bundle in this graph is a searchset Bundle returned by FHIR query with the Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Reports.
This IG describes two approaches to generate a Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report. The approaches provide an adoption strategy that allows consumers of this IG to choose an implementation that matches their current state of FHIR maturity, including an option for generating a Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report that requires little to no FHIR maturity and then transition to more mature approaches as their FHIR maturity grows. As mentioned above, the Payer can use one or more of these processes as fits their need or stage as they transition their processes.
This approach requires little to no FHIR maturity to generate the Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report. The Payer uses their existing processes, such as SQL, SAS, and object-oriented languages, to create a comma-separated value (CSV) file with tuples of patient and risk adjustment data. The Payer then uses a non-FHIR RESTful API to create the Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report using the CSV file as input. Note that using this approach means that no evaluated resources will be created or referenced by the Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report.
The table below defines a standardized CSV header that could be used for the Assisted approach.
Header Element | Description | Mapping | Example Value |
---|---|---|---|
periodStart | Start of the clinical evaluation period | MeasureReport.period.start |
1/1/2021 |
periodEnd | End of clinical evaluation period | MeasureReport.period.end |
9/30/2021 |
modelId | Risk adjustment model identifier | Measure.identifier (MeasureReport.measure) |
https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01 |
modelVersion | Risk adjustment model version | Measure.version (MeasureReport.measure) |
24 |
patientId | Patient identifier | Patient.identifier (MeasureReport.subject) |
ra-patient01 |
ccCode | Condition Category Code | MeasureGroup.group.code |
18 |
suspectType | Coding gap suspect type | MeasureReport.group.suspectType |
historic |
evidenceStatus | Coding gap evidence status | MeasureReport.group.evidenceStatus |
open-gap |
evidenceStatusDate | Coding gap evidence status date | MeasureReport.group.evidenceStatusDate |
4/1/2021 |
hierarchicalStatus | Coding gap hierarchical status | MeasureReport.group.hierarchicalStatus |
applied-not-superseded |
Scenario:
The Payer has used their existing processes to collect risk adjustment data and would to use the Assisted Approach to generate a Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report.
POST risk adjustment CSV data to REST endpoint
POST [base]
Request body
periodStart,periodEnd,modelId,modelVersion,patientId,ccCode,suspectType,evidenceStatus,evidenceStatusDate,hierarchicalStatus
2021-01-01,2021-09-30,https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01,24,ra-patient01,18,historic,closed-gap,2021-04-01,applied-not-superseded
2021-01-01,2021-09-30,https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01,24,ra-patient01,111,historic,pending,2021-09-29,applied-not-superseded
2021-01-01,2021-09-30,https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01,24,ra-patient01,24,historic,open-gap,2020-07-15,applied-not-superseded
2021-01-01,2021-09-30,https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01,24,ra-patient01,112,historic,closed-gap,2021-04-27,applied-superseded
2021-01-01,2021-09-30,https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01,24,ra-patient01,19,historic,pending,2021-09-27,applied-superseded
2021-01-01,2021-09-30,https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01,24,ra-patient01,84,historic,open-gap,2020-12-15,applied-superseded
2021-01-01,2021-09-30,https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01,24,ra-patient01,22,suspected,closed-gap,2021-03-15,applied-not-superseded
2021-01-01,2021-09-30,https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01,24,ra-patient01,96,suspected,pending,2021-09-27,applied-not-superseded
2021-01-01,2021-09-30,https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01,24,ra-patient01,110,suspected,open-gap,2020-07-15,applied-not-superseded
2021-01-01,2021-09-30,https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01,24,ra-patient01,83,net-new,pending,2021-09-28,applied-not-superseded
2021-01-01,2021-09-30,https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01,24,ra-patient01,59,historic,open-gap,2020-07-15,applied-not-superseded
Response
{
"resourceType": "Bundle",
"type": "transaction",
"entry": [
{
"resource": {
"resourceType": "MeasureReport",
"id": "assisted-5534e962-4493-4be7-9499-aeadc962f641",
"meta": {
"profile": [
"https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition-ra-measurereport.html"
]
},
"status": "complete",
"type": "individual",
"measure": "https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01",
"subject": {
"reference": "Patient/ra-patient01"
},
"date": "2023-03-10T18:31:14+00:00",
"period": {
"start": "2021-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"end": "2021-09-30T00:00:00+00:00"
},
"group": [
{
"id": "group-18",
"extension": [
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-suspectType",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/suspect-type",
"code": "historic"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatus",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/evidence-status",
"code": "closed-gap"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatusDate",
"valueDate": "2021-04-01"
}
],
"code": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/cmshcc",
"version": "24",
"code": "18"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "group-111",
"extension": [
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-suspectType",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/suspect-type",
"code": "historic"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatus",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/evidence-status",
"code": "pending"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatusDate",
"valueDate": "2021-09-29"
}
],
"code": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/cmshcc",
"version": "24",
"code": "111"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "group-24",
"extension": [
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-suspectType",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/suspect-type",
"code": "historic"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatus",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/evidence-status",
"code": "open-gap"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatusDate",
"valueDate": "2020-07-15"
}
],
"code": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/cmshcc",
"version": "24",
"code": "24"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "group-112",
"extension": [
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-suspectType",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/suspect-type",
"code": "historic"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatus",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/evidence-status",
"code": "closed-gap"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatusDate",
"valueDate": "2021-04-27"
}
],
"code": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/cmshcc",
"version": "24",
"code": "112"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "group-19",
"extension": [
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-suspectType",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/suspect-type",
"code": "historic"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatus",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/evidence-status",
"code": "pending"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatusDate",
"valueDate": "2021-09-27"
}
],
"code": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/cmshcc",
"version": "24",
"code": "19"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "group-84",
"extension": [
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-suspectType",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/suspect-type",
"code": "historic"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatus",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/evidence-status",
"code": "open-gap"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatusDate",
"valueDate": "2020-12-15"
}
],
"code": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/cmshcc",
"version": "24",
"code": "84"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "group-22",
"extension": [
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-suspectType",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/suspect-type",
"code": "suspected"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatus",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/evidence-status",
"code": "closed-gap"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatusDate",
"valueDate": "2021-03-15"
}
],
"code": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/cmshcc",
"version": "24",
"code": "22"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "group-96",
"extension": [
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-suspectType",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/suspect-type",
"code": "suspected"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatus",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/evidence-status",
"code": "pending"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatusDate",
"valueDate": "2021-09-27"
}
],
"code": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/cmshcc",
"version": "24",
"code": "96"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "group-110",
"extension": [
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-suspectType",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/suspect-type",
"code": "suspected"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatus",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/evidence-status",
"code": "open-gap"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatusDate",
"valueDate": "2020-07-15"
}
],
"code": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/cmshcc",
"version": "24",
"code": "110"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "group-83",
"extension": [
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-suspectType",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/suspect-type",
"code": "net-new"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatus",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/evidence-status",
"code": "pending"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatusDate",
"valueDate": "2021-09-28"
}
],
"code": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/cmshcc",
"version": "24",
"code": "83"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "group-59",
"extension": [
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-suspectType",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/suspect-type",
"code": "historic"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatus",
"valueCodeableConcept": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/evidence-status",
"code": "open-gap"
}
]
}
},
{
"url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-evidenceStatusDate",
"valueDate": "2020-07-15"
}
],
"code": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/cmshcc",
"version": "24",
"code": "59"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"request": {
"method": "PUT",
"url": "MeasureReport/assisted-5534e962-4493-4be7-9499-aeadc962f641"
}
}
]
}
This approach requires an implementation that adheres to the requirements of this IG to generate the Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report. The Payer constructs the FHIR Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report and the evaluated resources based on data from traditional risk adjustment coding gap reports. These traditional reports are created by their existing processes using patient and risk adjustment data produced by risk adjustment engines.
GET [base]/MeasureReport/?subject=Patient/ra-patient02&period=ge2021-01-01&period=le2021-12-31&measurereport-category="ra"&_include=MeasureReport:evaluated-resource
Scenario:
A provider requested a risk adjustment coding gap report for patient, ra-patient01, to see if the patient has any risk adjustment coding gaps for the clinical evaluation period from 2021-01-01 to 2021-09-30.
GET Risk Adjustment Coding Gaps Report
GET [base]/MeasureReport/?subject=Patient/ra-patient01&period=ge2021-01-01&period=le2021-09-30&_profile=http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-measurereport&_include=MeasureReport:evaluated-resource
Request body
(Note that request body is not applicable in this example)
Response
HTTP/1.1 200
Date: Tues, 16 November 2021 01:02:06 GMT
Content-Type: application/fhir+json;charset=UTF-8
...Other Headers...
{
"resourceType" : "Bundle",
"id" : "ra-bundle02",
"meta": {
"lastUpdated": "2021-11-16T01:02:06"
},
"identifier" : {
"system" : "urn:ietf:rfc:3986",
"value" : "urn:uuid:af2e880f-3992-4cae-8f0d-aaf3a5c49c9e"
},
"type" : "searchset",
"entry" : [
{
"fullUrl" : "https://ra.davinci.hl7.org/fhir/MeasureReport/ra-measurereport01",
"resource" : {
"resourceType" : "MeasureReport",
"id" : "ra-measurereport01",
"meta" : {
"profile" : [
"http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-measurereport"
]
},
"status" : "complete",
"type" : "individual",
"measure" : "https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-ra/Measure-RAModelExample01",
"subject" : {
"reference" : "Patient/ra-patient01"
},
"date" : "2021-10-18",
"reporter" : {
"reference" : "Organization/ra-payer01"
},
"period" : {
"start" : "2021-01-01",
"end" : "2021-09-30"
},
"group" : [
{
"id" : "group-001",
"extension" : [
{
"url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-suspectType",
"valueCodeableConcept" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/CodeSystem/suspect-type",
"code" : "historic"
}
]
}
},
...
}
If requesting Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report for many patients, the Reporting Client may consider using the FHIR Asynchronous Request Patterns for the Bulk Data exchange operation.
GET [base]/MeasureReport/?subject=Group/ra-group123&period=ge2021-01-01&period=le2021-12-31&measurereport-category="ra"&_include=MeasureReport:evaluated-resource
Scenario:
The Client would like to request risk adjustment coding gap reports on many patients. They have created a FHIR Group resource using the Risk Adjustment Patient Group profile with the id of ra-group123. Because they expect the creation of the reports to take a while and many FHIR bundles will be returned and be processed, they would like to make the request in an asynchronous manner returning NDJSON that will be easier for them to process.
The request below asks for Group id of ra-group123 to be run asynchronously with FHIR+ndjson as the output format. The header portions should be entered in the API client header section. For example, in the Postman tool, enter “Prefer” in Key and “respond-async” in Value as an entry in the Headers tab.
GET Risk Adjustment Coding Gap Report Using Bulk Data
Run $report operation in an asynchronous mode:
GET [base]/MeasureReport/?subject=Group/ra-group123&period=ge2021-01-01&period=le2021-12-31&_profile=http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-measurereport&_include=MeasureReport:evaluated-resource
Headers:
Prefer respond-async
Accept application/fhir+json
Note that both Prefer and Accept are required. Prefer specifies the response is immediate or asynchronous, which SHALL be set to respond-async. Accept specifies the format of the optional OperationOutcome response to the kick-off request. Any of the Serialization Format Representations are supported. See the base FHIR specification Asynchronous Request Patterns for details.
Query Parameters:
_outputFormat (string, optional, defaults to application/fhir+ndjson)
Currently, only application/fhir+ndjson is supported.
POST [base]/bundle
Scenario:
A payer posts a risk adjustment coding gap report for patient, ra-patient01, to let the provider know if the patient has any risk adjustment coding gaps for the clinical evaluation period from 2021-01-01 to 2021-09-30.
POST Risk Adjustment Coding Gaps Report
POST [base]/bundle/ra-bundle01
Request body
{
"resourceType": "Bundle",
"id": "ra-bundle01",
"meta": {
"profile": [
"http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-measurereport-bundle"
]
},
"identifier": {
"system": "urn:ietf:rfc:3986",
"value": "urn:uuid:8d3e72d9-9d74-4cbb-b797-a1cab0d13492"
},
"type": "collection",
"timestamp": "2021-11-16T06:17:58.172+00:00",
"entry": [
{
"fullUrl": "https://ra.davinci.hl7.org/fhir/MeasureReport/ra-measurereport01",
"resource": {
"resourceType": "MeasureReport",
"id": "ra-measurereport01",
"meta": {
"profile": [
"http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-ra/StructureDefinition/ra-measurereport"
]
},
...
Response
HTTP/1.1 200 ok