The jira specification file appears to be out of date with the versions, artifacts and pages currently defined in the IG. A proposed revised file to be reviewed and, if appropriate, submitted as a pull request against the XML folder in https://github.com/HL7/JIRA-Spec-Artifacts. To see the differences, perform a file compare on 'template/jira-current.xml' (a normalized view of what is in Github) and 'template/jira-new.xml' (reflects current IG content)
en/StructureDefinition-profile-mapping.html
information
The html source contains the word 'SHALL' but it is not in a text phrase marked as a conformance clause: 'This extension defines a relationship between a search string and a profile. Any resource that meets a given search string will be expected to conform to the particular profile. If more than one profile is nominated for a search string, resources SHALL conform to all the listed profiles. The last extension can be without a search matches and remaining resources'CONFORMANCE_STATEMENT_WORD
The html source contains the word 'SHALL NOT' but it is not in a text phrase marked as a conformance clause: 'If 'true', means that 'conformance' should behave as though it also had a code of 'SHALL NOT' (as introduced in FHIR R6).'CONFORMANCE_STATEMENT_WORD
en/index.html
information
The html source contains the word 'SHALL NOT' but it is not in a text phrase marked as a conformance clause: 'Allows a statement to have a 'conformance' level of 'SHALL NOT', which was not introduced until R6 'CONFORMANCE_STATEMENT_WORD
en/parameterized-valuesets.html
information
Unable to find a conformance word for the language en in the text "<div summary="Additional markdown conformance statement SHALL apply" id="conf-1a" class="fhir-conformance"><p>Title</p> <p>This is a broken additional conformance statement because only the title has conformance language:</p> <ul> <li>Clause 1</li> <li>Clause 2</li> </ul></div>", so conformance statement not extracted.CONFORMANCE_STATEMENT_NOCONFWORD
es/StructureDefinition-profile-mapping.html
information
The html source contains the word 'SHALL' but it is not in a text phrase marked as a conformance clause: 'This extension defines a relationship between a search string and a profile. Any resource that meets a given search string will be expected to conform to the particular profile. If more than one profile is nominated for a search string, resources SHALL conform to all the listed profiles. The last extension can be without a search matches and remaining resources'CONFORMANCE_STATEMENT_WORD
The html source contains the word 'SHALL NOT' but it is not in a text phrase marked as a conformance clause: 'If 'true', means that 'conformance' should behave as though it also had a code of 'SHALL NOT' (as introduced in FHIR R6).'CONFORMANCE_STATEMENT_WORD
es/index.html
information
The html source contains the word 'SHALL NOT' but it is not in a text phrase marked as a conformance clause: 'Allows a statement to have a 'conformance' level of 'SHALL NOT', which was not introduced until R6 'CONFORMANCE_STATEMENT_WORD
es/parameterized-valuesets.html
information
Unable to find a conformance word for the language es in the text "<div summary="Additional markdown conformance statement SHALL apply" id="conf-1a" class="fhir-conformance"><p>Title</p> <p>This is a broken additional conformance statement because only the title has conformance language:</p> <ul> <li>Clause 1</li> <li>Clause 2</li> </ul></div>", so conformance statement not extracted.CONFORMANCE_STATEMENT_NOCONFWORD
Constraint failed: eld-24: 'pattern[x] should be used rather than fixed[x] (fixed.exists().not())' (defined in http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ElementDefinition) (Best Practice Recommendation)http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ElementDefinition#eld-24
Constraint failed: eld-24: 'pattern[x] should be used rather than fixed[x] (fixed.exists().not())' (defined in http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ElementDefinition) (Best Practice Recommendation)http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ElementDefinition#eld-24
Hyperlink '#CDSHooksResponse.cards.suggestions.actions' at 'div/div/table/tr/td/a' for 'actions' resolves to multiple targets ($/text/div/div[0]/table/tr[16]/td[0]/a[1]/@name, $/snapshot/element/id, $/differential/element/id)TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_XHTML_MULTIPLE_MATCHES
Extensions and id aren't possible here, so fixed is appropriate
WARNING: StructureDefinition/CDSHooksRequest: StructureDefinition.differential.element[6]: Constraint failed: eld-24: 'pattern[x] should be used rather than fixed[x]' (defined in http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ElementDefinition) (Best Practice Recommendation) (0 uses)
WARNING: StructureDefinition/CDSHooksRequest: StructureDefinition.snapshot.element[8]: Constraint failed: eld-24: 'pattern[x] should be used rather than fixed[x]' (defined in http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ElementDefinition) (Best Practice Recommendation) (0 uses)
These won't ever be move to THO
CODESYSTEM_THO_CHECK (16 uses)
This isn't a conformance usage
INFORMATION: StructureDefinition-requirements-statementshallnot.html: The html source contains the word 'SHALL' but it is not in a text phrase marked as a conformance clause (0 uses)
Will be cleaned up when moving CDS hooks content to CDSHooks spec
CODESYSTEM_PROPERTY_UNKNOWN_CODE (4 uses)
Will be fixed by a future extensions pack release
MSG_DRAFT (0 uses)
this is ok
MSG_DEPRECATED (115 uses)
SD_CONTEXT_SHOULD_NOT_BE_ELEMENT (3 uses)
The Implementation Guide contains no examples for this extension (49 uses)
The element Extension.extension.value[x] has a binding, and has multiple types subject to bindings ([code, string]). The binding will apply to all the types (1 uses)
The string value contains text that looks like embedded HTML tags. If this content is rendered to HTML without appropriate post-processing, it may be a security risk (1 uses)
Hyperlink '#CDSHooksResponse.cards.suggestions.actions' at 'div/div/table/tr/td/a' for 'actions' resolves to multiple targets ($/text/div/div[0]/table/tr[16]/td[0]/a[1]/@name, $/snapshot/element/id, $/differential/element/id)