This Resource provides one or more comments, classifiers or ratings about a Resource and supports attribution and rights management metadata for the added content.

An absolute URI that is used to identify this ArtifactAssessment when it is referenced in a specification, model, design or an instance; also called its canonical identifier. This SHOULD be globally unique and SHOULD be a literal address at which an authoritative instance of this ArtifactAssessment is (or will be) published. This URL can be the target of a canonical reference. It SHALL remain the same when the ArtifactAssessment is stored on different servers.

Allows the ArtifactAssessment to be referenced by a single globally unique identifier.

Can be a urn:uuid: or a urn:oid: but real http: addresses are preferred. Multiple instances may share the same URL if they have a distinct version.

The determination of when to create a new version of a resource (same url, new version) vs. defining a new artifact is up to the author. Considerations for making this decision are found in Technical and Business Versions.

In some cases, the resource can no longer be found at the stated url, but the url itself cannot change. Implementations can use the meta.source element to indicate where the current master source of the resource can be found.

A formal identifier that is used to identify this artifact assessment when it is represented in other formats, or referenced in a specification, model, design or an instance.

Allows externally provided and/or usable business identifiers to be easily associated with the artifact assessment.

This may be used for identifiers that can go in an HL7 V3 II (instance identifier) data type, and can then identify this artifact assessment outside of FHIR, where it is not possible to use the logical URI.

The identifier that is used to identify this version of the ArtifactAssessment when it is referenced in a specification, model, design or instance. This is an arbitrary value managed by the ArtifactAssessment author and is not expected to be globally unique. For example, it might be a SemVer version, timestamp (e.g. yyyymmdd), or incrementing number. There is no expectation that versions can be placed in a lexicographical sequence without additional knowledge.

There may be different ArtifactAssessments that have the same canonical url but different versions. The version can be appended to the url in a reference to allow a reference to a particular canonical version of the ArtifactAssessment with the format [url]|[version]. Note that the canonical version of a resource is not related to a server resource instance version (Resource.meta.versionId). For more information, see Version Matching for Canonical Resources. The version SHOULD NOT contain a '#' - see Business Version.

Indicates the mechanism used to compare canonical versions to determine which is more current.

If set as a string, this is a FHIRPath expression that has two additional context variables passed in - %version1 and %version2 and will return a negative number if version1 is newer, a positive number if version2 and a 0 if the version ordering can't be successfully be determined. For more information, see Choosing the right Canonical Reference.

A natural language name identifying the ArtifactAssessment. This name should be usable as an identifier for the resource by machine processing applications such as code generation.

Supports code generation.

The name is not expected to be globally unique. The name should be a simple alphanumeric type no-whitespace name to ensure that it is machine-processing friendly.

A label for use in displaying and selecting the artifact assessment.

The current state of this ArtifactAssessment.

Enables tracking the life-cycle of the content and filtering of ArtifactAssessments that are appropriate for use versus not.

A nominal state-transition diagram can be found in the Definition pattern documentation.

Unknown does not represent 'other' - one of the defined statuses must apply. Unknown is used when the authoring system is not sure what the current status is.

See guidance around (not) making local changes to elements here.

If a server wishes to reflect whether a given canonical resource is 'supported' or 'enabled' on that server, this is NOT done with status. Instead, expose support for the resource using a 'feature' in the server's CapabilityStatement.

A Boolean value to indicate that this ArtifactAssessment is authored for testing purposes (or education/evaluation/marketing) and no version of this resource will ever be intended for genuine usage.

Enables experimental content to be developed following the same lifecycle that would be used for a production-level ArtifactAssessment.

Allows filtering of ArtifactAssessments that are appropriate for use versus not. Experimental resources might include example instances in implementation guides, instances created solely for testing purposes, etc. If experimental is 'true' for any version of a resource, it should be true for all versions of the resource. (If experimental changes, then it is being misused or a resource that was never intended for real-world use has unexpectedly changed its purpose.).

Experimental resources are not expected to be stable and may well have breaking changes without a corresponding change to the 'version' element.

The date (and optionally time) when the artifact assessment was published. The date must change when the disposition changes and it must change if the workflow status code changes. In addition, it should change when the substantive content of the artifact assessment changes.

The date is often not tracked until the resource is published, but may be present on draft content. Note that this is not the same as the resource last-modified-date, since the resource may be a secondary representation of the artifact assessment. Additional specific dates may be added as extensions or be found by consulting Provenances associated with past versions of the resource.

The name of the organization or individual responsible for the release and ongoing maintenance of the ArtifactAssessment.

Helps establish the "authority/credibility" of the ArtifactAssessment. May also allow for contact.

Usually an organization but may be an individual. The publisher (or steward) of the ArtifactAssessment is the organization or individual primarily responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the ArtifactAssessment. This is not necessarily the same individual or organization that developed and initially authored the content. The publisher is the primary point of contact for questions or issues with the ArtifactAssessment. This item SHOULD be populated unless the information is available from context. The publisher is not necessarily an entity that is involved in developing the content of the resource.

Contact details to assist a user in finding and communicating with the publisher.

May be a web site, an email address, a telephone number, etc.

See guidance around (not) making local changes to elements here.

A free text natural language description of the ArtifactAssessment from a consumer's perspective.

This description can be used to capture details such as comments about misuse, instructions for clinical use and interpretation, literature references, examples from the paper world, etc. It is not a rendering of the ArtifactAssessment as conveyed in the 'text' field of the resource itself. This item SHOULD be populated unless the information is available from context.

The content was developed with a focus and intent of supporting the contexts that are listed. These contexts may be general categories (gender, age, ...) or may be references to specific programs (insurance plans, studies, ...) and may be used to assist with indexing and searching for appropriate ArtifactAssessments.

Assist in searching for appropriate content.

When multiple useContexts are specified, there is no expectation that all or even any of the contexts apply.

A legal or geographic region in which the authority that maintains the resource is operating. In general, the jurisdiction is also found in the useContext. The useContext may reference additional jurisdictions because the defining jurisdiction does not necessarily limit the jurisdictions of use.

It may be possible for the ArtifactAssessment to be used in jurisdictions other than those for which it was originally designed or intended.

Explanation of why this ArtifactAssessment is needed and why it has been designed as it has.

This element does not describe the usage of the ArtifactAssessment. Instead, it provides traceability of "why" the resource is either needed or "why" it is defined as it is. This may be used to point to source materials or specifications that drove the structure of this ArtifactAssessment.

A copyright statement relating to the artifact assessment and/or its contents. Copyright statements are notices of intellectual property ownership and can include restrictions on the use and publishing of the artifact assessment.

Consumers must be able to determine any legal restrictions on the use of the artifact assessment and/or its content.

A short string (<50 characters), suitable for inclusion in a page footer that identifies the copyright holder, effective period, and optionally whether rights are restricted. (e.g. 'All rights reserved', 'Some rights reserved').

Defines the content expected to be rendered in all representations of the artifact.

The copyright symbol and the '(c)' textual representation SHOULD NOT be included in this string. It will be added by software when rendering the notation. Full details about licensing, restrictions, warrantees, etc. goes in the more general 'copyright' element.

A detailed description of how the ArtifactAssessment is used from a clinical/user perspective.

The date on which the resource content was approved by the publisher. Approval happens once when the content is officially approved for usage.

The 'date' element may be more recent than the approval date because of minor changes or editorial corrections.

The date on which the resource content was last reviewed. Review happens periodically after approval but does not change the original approval date.

Gives a sense of how "current" the content is. Resources that have not been reviewed in a long time may have a risk of being less appropriate/relevant.

If specified, this date follows the original approval date.

The period during which the ArtifactAssessment content was or is planned to be in active use.

Allows establishing a transition before a resource comes into effect and also allows for a sunsetting process when new versions of the ArtifactAssessment are or are expected to be used instead.

The effective period for a ArtifactAssessment determines when the content is applicable for usage and is independent of publication and review dates. For example, a measure intended to be used for the year 2016 might be published in 2015.

See guidance around (not) making local changes to elements here.

An individual or organization primarily involved in the development of the content in the ArtifactAssessment.

An author does not necessarily have the authority to manage the actual publication of releases of the resource.

An individual or organization primarily responsible for internal coherence of the ArtifactAssessment.

An individual or organization asserted by the publisher to be primarily responsible for review of some aspect of the ArtifactAssessment.

See guidance around (not) making local changes to elements here.

An individual or organization asserted by the publisher to be responsible for officially endorsing the ArtifactAssessment for use in some setting.

See guidance around (not) making local changes to elements here.

Relationship that this ArtifactAssessment has with other FHIR or non-FHIR resources that already exist.

The type of relationship to the related artifact.

The artifact that is related to this ArtifactAssessment Resource.

Display of the bibliographic citation of the comment, classifier, or rating.

A reference to a resource, canonical resource, or non-FHIR resource which the comment or assessment is about.

A component comment, classifier, or rating of the artifact.

A brief summary of the content of this component.

Indicates what type of content this component represents.

Represents a rating, classifier, or assessment of the artifact.

A quantitative rating of the artifact.

Indicates who or what authored the content.

A URI that points to what the comment is about, such as a line of text in the CQL, or a specific element in a resource.

The target element is used to point the comment to aspect of the artifact, such as a text range within a CQL library (e.g. #content?0:0-120:80).

Relationship that this content component has with other FHIR or non-FHIR resources that already exist.

Acceptable to publicly share the comment, classifier or rating.

Absence of a value should be interpreted as inheriting any freeToShare value present in a containing structure, else inheriting data from the ArtifactAssessment.copyright element, else value unknown.

A component comment, classifier, or rating of the artifact.

Indicates the workflow status of the comment or change request.

Indicates the disposition of the responsible party to the comment or change request.