xShare Project CarePlan
1.0.0-ci - ci-build
150
xShare Project CarePlan, published by xShare Project. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 1.0.0-ci built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/hl7-eu/xshare-careplan/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions
| Draft as of 2026-04-21 |
Definitions for the Careplan-logical logical model.
Guidance on how to interpret the contents of this table can be foundhere
| 0. Careplan-logical | |
| Definition | Logical model representing a Care Plan structure with metadata, care team participation, subject and clinical context, goals, supporting information, planned or performed activities, and activity outcomes. |
| Short | Care Plan (Logical Model) |
| Control | 0..* |
| Is Modifier | false |
| Logical Model | Instances of this logical model are not marked to be the target of a Reference |
| 2. Careplan-logical.title | |
| Definition | Human-friendly title of the care plan. |
| Short | Title |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 4. Careplan-logical.description | |
| Definition | Narrative description of the care plan. |
| Short | Description |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | markdown |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 6. Careplan-logical.status | |
| Definition | Workflow/lifecycle status of the care plan. |
| Short | Status |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | code |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 8. Careplan-logical.category | |
| Definition | Categorization of the care plan (e.g., rehab, chronic care, oncology). |
| Short | Category |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | CodeableConcept |
| 10. Careplan-logical.period | |
| Definition | Time period the care plan covers. |
| Short | Period |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | Period |
| 12. Careplan-logical.author[x] | |
| Definition | Person or organization responsible for creating the care plan. |
| Short | Author |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Choice of: http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSHealthProfessional, http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSOrganisation |
| [x] Note | SeeChoice of Data Typesfor further information about how to use [x] |
| 14. Careplan-logical.careTeam | |
| Definition | Care team or responsible organization in charge of the plan. |
| Short | Care team / organization in charge |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | BackboneElement |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) |
| 16. Careplan-logical.careTeam.id | |
| Definition | Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces. |
| Short | Unique id for inter-element referencing |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Is Modifier | false |
| XML Format | In the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute. |
| Summary | false |
| 18. Careplan-logical.careTeam.extension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
| Short | Additional content defined by implementations |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | false |
| Summary | false |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both (extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| Slicing | This element introduces a set of slices on Careplan-logical.careTeam.extension. The slices areUnordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators: |
| 20. Careplan-logical.careTeam.modifierExtension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself). |
| Short | Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | true because Modifier extensions are expected to modify the meaning or interpretation of the element that contains them |
| Summary | true |
| Requirements | Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions. |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content, modifiers |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both (extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| 22. Careplan-logical.careTeam.member[x] | |
| Definition | References to practitioners, organizations, or related persons involved in the care plan. |
| Short | Care team member |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Choice of: http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSHealthProfessional, http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSOrganisation |
| [x] Note | SeeChoice of Data Typesfor further information about how to use [x] |
| 24. Careplan-logical.subject | |
| Definition | The patient who is the subject of this care plan. |
| Short | Subject |
| Control | 1..1 |
| Type | http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSPatient |
| 26. Careplan-logical.reason | |
| Definition | Problems/health concerns prompting the care plan. |
| Short | Reason (problem/health concern) |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSCondition |
| 28. Careplan-logical.supportingInfo | |
| Definition | Evidence or other supporting information used as the basis for this care plan. |
| Short | Evidence / supporting information |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Reference(Resource) |
| 30. Careplan-logical.goal | |
| Definition | Goals defined for the care plan, including treatment goals defined by the care team and patient goals expressed by the patient. |
| Short | Goal |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | BackboneElement |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) |
| 32. Careplan-logical.goal.id | |
| Definition | Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces. |
| Short | Unique id for inter-element referencing |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Is Modifier | false |
| XML Format | In the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute. |
| Summary | false |
| 34. Careplan-logical.goal.extension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
| Short | Additional content defined by implementations |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | false |
| Summary | false |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both (extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| Slicing | This element introduces a set of slices on Careplan-logical.goal.extension. The slices areUnordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators: |
| 36. Careplan-logical.goal.modifierExtension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself). |
| Short | Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | true because Modifier extensions are expected to modify the meaning or interpretation of the element that contains them |
| Summary | true |
| Requirements | Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions. |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content, modifiers |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both (extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| 38. Careplan-logical.goal.category | |
| Definition | Categorization of the goal (e.g., treatment goal, patient goal). |
| Short | Goal category |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | CodeableConcept |
| 40. Careplan-logical.goal.description | |
| Definition | Description of the goal. |
| Short | Goal description |
| Control | 1..1 |
| Type | string |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 42. Careplan-logical.goal.target | |
| Definition | Target of the goal. |
| Short | Goal target |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | CodeableConcept |
| 44. Careplan-logical.goal.due | |
| Definition | Date by which the goal should be met or reviewed. |
| Short | Goal due date |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | date |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 46. Careplan-logical.activity | |
| Definition | Planned or performed activities as part of the care plan. |
| Short | Activity |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | BackboneElement |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) |
| 48. Careplan-logical.activity.id | |
| Definition | Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces. |
| Short | Unique id for inter-element referencing |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Is Modifier | false |
| XML Format | In the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute. |
| Summary | false |
| 50. Careplan-logical.activity.extension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
| Short | Additional content defined by implementations |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | false |
| Summary | false |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both (extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| Slicing | This element introduces a set of slices on Careplan-logical.activity.extension. The slices areUnordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators: |
| 52. Careplan-logical.activity.modifierExtension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself). |
| Short | Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | true because Modifier extensions are expected to modify the meaning or interpretation of the element that contains them |
| Summary | true |
| Requirements | Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions. |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content, modifiers |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both (extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| 54. Careplan-logical.activity.workflowStatus | |
| Definition | Workflow status of the activity (e.g., planned, in-progress, completed, stopped). |
| Short | Workflow status |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | code |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 56. Careplan-logical.activity.narrative | |
| Definition | Human-readable narrative describing the activity. |
| Short | Narrative |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | markdown |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 58. Careplan-logical.activity.structured | |
| Definition | Reference to a formal request/performance (e.g., ServiceRequest, Procedure, Task). |
| Short | Reference to formal artifact |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | Reference(Resource) |
| 60. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome | |
| Definition | Outcome(s) captured for the activity. |
| Short | Outcome |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | BackboneElement |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) |
| 62. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.id | |
| Definition | Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces. |
| Short | Unique id for inter-element referencing |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Is Modifier | false |
| XML Format | In the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute. |
| Summary | false |
| 64. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.extension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
| Short | Additional content defined by implementations |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | false |
| Summary | false |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both (extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| Slicing | This element introduces a set of slices on Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.extension. The slices areUnordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators: |
| 66. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.modifierExtension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself). |
| Short | Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | true because Modifier extensions are expected to modify the meaning or interpretation of the element that contains them |
| Summary | true |
| Requirements | Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions. |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content, modifiers |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both (extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| 68. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.summary | |
| Definition | Short textual summary of the outcome. |
| Short | Outcome summary |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 70. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.evidence | |
| Definition | References to observations/documents or other evidence supporting the outcome. |
| Short | Outcome evidence |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Reference(Resource) |
Guidance on how to interpret the contents of this table can be foundhere
| 0. Careplan-logical | |
| Definition | Logical model representing a Care Plan structure with metadata, care team participation, subject and clinical context, goals, supporting information, planned or performed activities, and activity outcomes. |
| Short | Care Plan (Logical Model) |
| Logical Model | Instances of this logical model are not marked to be the target of a Reference |
| 2. Careplan-logical.title | |
| Definition | Human-friendly title of the care plan. |
| Short | Title |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 4. Careplan-logical.description | |
| Definition | Narrative description of the care plan. |
| Short | Description |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | markdown |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 6. Careplan-logical.status | |
| Definition | Workflow/lifecycle status of the care plan. |
| Short | Status |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | code |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 8. Careplan-logical.category | |
| Definition | Categorization of the care plan (e.g., rehab, chronic care, oncology). |
| Short | Category |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | CodeableConcept |
| 10. Careplan-logical.period | |
| Definition | Time period the care plan covers. |
| Short | Period |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | Period |
| 12. Careplan-logical.author[x] | |
| Definition | Person or organization responsible for creating the care plan. |
| Short | Author |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Choice of: http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSHealthProfessional, http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSOrganisation |
| [x] Note | SeeChoice of Data Typesfor further information about how to use [x] |
| 14. Careplan-logical.careTeam | |
| Definition | Care team or responsible organization in charge of the plan. |
| Short | Care team / organization in charge |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | BackboneElement |
| 16. Careplan-logical.careTeam.member[x] | |
| Definition | References to practitioners, organizations, or related persons involved in the care plan. |
| Short | Care team member |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Choice of: http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSHealthProfessional, http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSOrganisation |
| [x] Note | SeeChoice of Data Typesfor further information about how to use [x] |
| 18. Careplan-logical.subject | |
| Definition | The patient who is the subject of this care plan. |
| Short | Subject |
| Control | 1..1 |
| Type | http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSPatient |
| 20. Careplan-logical.reason | |
| Definition | Problems/health concerns prompting the care plan. |
| Short | Reason (problem/health concern) |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSCondition |
| 22. Careplan-logical.supportingInfo | |
| Definition | Evidence or other supporting information used as the basis for this care plan. |
| Short | Evidence / supporting information |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Reference(Resource) |
| 24. Careplan-logical.goal | |
| Definition | Goals defined for the care plan, including treatment goals defined by the care team and patient goals expressed by the patient. |
| Short | Goal |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | BackboneElement |
| 26. Careplan-logical.goal.category | |
| Definition | Categorization of the goal (e.g., treatment goal, patient goal). |
| Short | Goal category |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | CodeableConcept |
| 28. Careplan-logical.goal.description | |
| Definition | Description of the goal. |
| Short | Goal description |
| Control | 1..1 |
| Type | string |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 30. Careplan-logical.goal.target | |
| Definition | Target of the goal. |
| Short | Goal target |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | CodeableConcept |
| 32. Careplan-logical.goal.due | |
| Definition | Date by which the goal should be met or reviewed. |
| Short | Goal due date |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | date |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 34. Careplan-logical.activity | |
| Definition | Planned or performed activities as part of the care plan. |
| Short | Activity |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | BackboneElement |
| 36. Careplan-logical.activity.workflowStatus | |
| Definition | Workflow status of the activity (e.g., planned, in-progress, completed, stopped). |
| Short | Workflow status |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | code |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 38. Careplan-logical.activity.narrative | |
| Definition | Human-readable narrative describing the activity. |
| Short | Narrative |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | markdown |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 40. Careplan-logical.activity.structured | |
| Definition | Reference to a formal request/performance (e.g., ServiceRequest, Procedure, Task). |
| Short | Reference to formal artifact |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | Reference(Resource) |
| 42. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome | |
| Definition | Outcome(s) captured for the activity. |
| Short | Outcome |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | BackboneElement |
| 44. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.summary | |
| Definition | Short textual summary of the outcome. |
| Short | Outcome summary |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 46. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.evidence | |
| Definition | References to observations/documents or other evidence supporting the outcome. |
| Short | Outcome evidence |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Reference(Resource) |
Guidance on how to interpret the contents of this table can be foundhere
| 0. Careplan-logical | |
| Definition | Logical model representing a Care Plan structure with metadata, care team participation, subject and clinical context, goals, supporting information, planned or performed activities, and activity outcomes. |
| Short | Care Plan (Logical Model) |
| Control | 0..* |
| Is Modifier | false |
| Logical Model | Instances of this logical model are not marked to be the target of a Reference |
| 2. Careplan-logical.title | |
| Definition | Human-friendly title of the care plan. |
| Short | Title |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 4. Careplan-logical.description | |
| Definition | Narrative description of the care plan. |
| Short | Description |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | markdown |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 6. Careplan-logical.status | |
| Definition | Workflow/lifecycle status of the care plan. |
| Short | Status |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | code |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 8. Careplan-logical.category | |
| Definition | Categorization of the care plan (e.g., rehab, chronic care, oncology). |
| Short | Category |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | CodeableConcept |
| 10. Careplan-logical.period | |
| Definition | Time period the care plan covers. |
| Short | Period |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | Period |
| 12. Careplan-logical.author[x] | |
| Definition | Person or organization responsible for creating the care plan. |
| Short | Author |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Choice of: http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSHealthProfessional, http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSOrganisation |
| [x] Note | SeeChoice of Data Typesfor further information about how to use [x] |
| 14. Careplan-logical.careTeam | |
| Definition | Care team or responsible organization in charge of the plan. |
| Short | Care team / organization in charge |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | BackboneElement |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) |
| 16. Careplan-logical.careTeam.id | |
| Definition | Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces. |
| Short | Unique id for inter-element referencing |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Is Modifier | false |
| XML Format | In the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute. |
| Summary | false |
| 18. Careplan-logical.careTeam.extension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
| Short | Additional content defined by implementations |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | false |
| Summary | false |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count()))ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both ( extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| Slicing | This element introduces a set of slices on Careplan-logical.careTeam.extension. The slices areUnordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators: |
| 20. Careplan-logical.careTeam.modifierExtension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself). |
| Short | Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | true because Modifier extensions are expected to modify the meaning or interpretation of the element that contains them |
| Summary | true |
| Requirements | Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions. |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content, modifiers |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count()))ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both ( extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| 22. Careplan-logical.careTeam.member[x] | |
| Definition | References to practitioners, organizations, or related persons involved in the care plan. |
| Short | Care team member |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Choice of: http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSHealthProfessional, http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSOrganisation |
| [x] Note | SeeChoice of Data Typesfor further information about how to use [x] |
| 24. Careplan-logical.subject | |
| Definition | The patient who is the subject of this care plan. |
| Short | Subject |
| Control | 1..1 |
| Type | http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSPatient |
| 26. Careplan-logical.reason | |
| Definition | Problems/health concerns prompting the care plan. |
| Short | Reason (problem/health concern) |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | http://www.xt-ehr.eu/fhir/models/StructureDefinition/EHDSCondition |
| 28. Careplan-logical.supportingInfo | |
| Definition | Evidence or other supporting information used as the basis for this care plan. |
| Short | Evidence / supporting information |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Reference(Resource) |
| 30. Careplan-logical.goal | |
| Definition | Goals defined for the care plan, including treatment goals defined by the care team and patient goals expressed by the patient. |
| Short | Goal |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | BackboneElement |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) |
| 32. Careplan-logical.goal.id | |
| Definition | Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces. |
| Short | Unique id for inter-element referencing |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Is Modifier | false |
| XML Format | In the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute. |
| Summary | false |
| 34. Careplan-logical.goal.extension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
| Short | Additional content defined by implementations |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | false |
| Summary | false |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count()))ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both ( extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| Slicing | This element introduces a set of slices on Careplan-logical.goal.extension. The slices areUnordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators: |
| 36. Careplan-logical.goal.modifierExtension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself). |
| Short | Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | true because Modifier extensions are expected to modify the meaning or interpretation of the element that contains them |
| Summary | true |
| Requirements | Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions. |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content, modifiers |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count()))ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both ( extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| 38. Careplan-logical.goal.category | |
| Definition | Categorization of the goal (e.g., treatment goal, patient goal). |
| Short | Goal category |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | CodeableConcept |
| 40. Careplan-logical.goal.description | |
| Definition | Description of the goal. |
| Short | Goal description |
| Control | 1..1 |
| Type | string |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 42. Careplan-logical.goal.target | |
| Definition | Target of the goal. |
| Short | Goal target |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | CodeableConcept |
| 44. Careplan-logical.goal.due | |
| Definition | Date by which the goal should be met or reviewed. |
| Short | Goal due date |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | date |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 46. Careplan-logical.activity | |
| Definition | Planned or performed activities as part of the care plan. |
| Short | Activity |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | BackboneElement |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) |
| 48. Careplan-logical.activity.id | |
| Definition | Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces. |
| Short | Unique id for inter-element referencing |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Is Modifier | false |
| XML Format | In the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute. |
| Summary | false |
| 50. Careplan-logical.activity.extension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
| Short | Additional content defined by implementations |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | false |
| Summary | false |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count()))ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both ( extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| Slicing | This element introduces a set of slices on Careplan-logical.activity.extension. The slices areUnordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators: |
| 52. Careplan-logical.activity.modifierExtension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself). |
| Short | Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | true because Modifier extensions are expected to modify the meaning or interpretation of the element that contains them |
| Summary | true |
| Requirements | Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions. |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content, modifiers |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count()))ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both ( extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| 54. Careplan-logical.activity.workflowStatus | |
| Definition | Workflow status of the activity (e.g., planned, in-progress, completed, stopped). |
| Short | Workflow status |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | code |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 56. Careplan-logical.activity.narrative | |
| Definition | Human-readable narrative describing the activity. |
| Short | Narrative |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | markdown |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 58. Careplan-logical.activity.structured | |
| Definition | Reference to a formal request/performance (e.g., ServiceRequest, Procedure, Task). |
| Short | Reference to formal artifact |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | Reference(Resource) |
| 60. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome | |
| Definition | Outcome(s) captured for the activity. |
| Short | Outcome |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | BackboneElement |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())) |
| 62. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.id | |
| Definition | Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces. |
| Short | Unique id for inter-element referencing |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Is Modifier | false |
| XML Format | In the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute. |
| Summary | false |
| 64. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.extension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
| Short | Additional content defined by implementations |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | false |
| Summary | false |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count()))ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both ( extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| Slicing | This element introduces a set of slices on Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.extension. The slices areUnordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators: |
| 66. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.modifierExtension | |
| Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself). |
| Short | Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized |
| Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Extension |
| Is Modifier | true because Modifier extensions are expected to modify the meaning or interpretation of the element that contains them |
| Summary | true |
| Requirements | Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions. |
| Alternate Names | extensions, user content, modifiers |
| Invariants | ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count()))ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both ( extension.exists() != value.exists()) |
| 68. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.summary | |
| Definition | Short textual summary of the outcome. |
| Short | Outcome summary |
| Control | 0..1 |
| Type | string |
| Primitive Value | This primitive element may be present, or absent, or replaced by an extension |
| 70. Careplan-logical.activity.outcome.evidence | |
| Definition | References to observations/documents or other evidence supporting the outcome. |
| Short | Outcome evidence |
| Control | 0..* |
| Type | Reference(Resource) |