Response to Regulatory Questions (RTQ)
0.1.0 - ci-build

Response to Regulatory Questions (RTQ), published by HL7 International. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 0.1.0 built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/HL7/rtq-ig/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions

Question Example

This example demonstrates a synthetic regulatory questionnaire issued during a Type II variation procedure, using FHIR R5 Questionnaire resources for structured, machine-readable exchange.

FHIR Integration Highlights

  • Each question maps to a Questionnaire.item with a linkId (e.g., "1").
  • Responses are captured in a QuestionnaireResponse resource (due 2025-12-11).
  • Supports multilingual ePI updates, stability data, and ICH/WHO zone alignment.

View the underlying FHIR Questionnaire resource (generated via FSH).

Regulatory Questionnaire

EMA List of Questions – Type II Variation (ID001)

Procedure Number: EMEA/H/C/005432/II/0023 | Response due: 2025-12-11

Sender: European Medicines Agency

Dr. Jane Doe

Scientific Officer

Scientific and Regulatory Management
Human Medicines Evaluation Division
European Medicines Agency

jane.doe@ema.europa.eu | +31-88-781-6000

Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, Netherlands

Recipient: SynthPharma AG

Dr. John Doe

Head of Regulatory Affairs

SynthPharma AG
Global Regulatory Strategy
Basel, Switzerland

john.doe@synthpharma.example

123 Synthetic Research Blvd, 4000 Basel, Switzerland

Questionnaire: RegulatoryQA-ID001

1
1.0 Administrative Information → 1.1 Application Form
Is the fee for the Type II variation fully paid and documented?

See EMA Fee Guidance for payment confirmation requirements.

2
1.0 Administrative Information → 1.1 Application Form
Are all required metadata fields in the application form complete?
  • Marketing Authorisation Holder
  • Product Name (INN)
  • Procedure Number
  • Submission Date
3
1.3 Product Information → 1.3.1 SmPC, Labelling and Package Leaflet
Do the updated storage conditions (2–8°C for 36 months) require additional patient guidance?

Current ePI states: “Store in a refrigerator (2°C – 8°C). Do not freeze.”

4
1.3 Product Information → 1.3.1 SmPC, Labelling and Package Leaflet
Is the patient leaflet revised to clarify the extended shelf life?

“Shelf life after first opening: 36 months when stored at 2–8°C”

5
1.3 Product Information → 1.3.1 SmPC, Labelling and Package Leaflet
Is the updated ePI text sufficiently clear for all EU languages?
LanguageStatus
EnglishApproved
FrenchUnder Review
GermanPending
6
3.2.P.8 Stability → 3.2.P.8.1 Stability Summary and Conclusion
Are there any new stability studies conducted, or does the submission include only data from additional timepoints from previously submitted studies?
  • Include protocol deviations if any.
  • Reference: ICH Q1A(R2)
7
3.2.P.8 Stability → 3.2.P.8.1 Stability Summary and Conclusion
Does the data support all intended climatic zones?
Note: Confirm coverage for Zone IVb (30°C/75% RH) per WHO TRS 1010
8
3.2.P.5 Control of Drug Product → 3.2.P.5.2 Analytical Procedures
Are the test methods used the same as in the previously submitted stability information?

If changed: justify and provide validation data.

9
3.2.P.5 Control of Drug Product → 3.2.P.5.4 Impurities
Are there any new degradation products identified within the newly submitted data?

Threshold: >0.10% per ICH Q3B(R2)

10
3.2.P.7 Container Closure System
Any changes in the packaging configuration and/or storage of the samples during stability?
[Figure 1: Cross-section of proposed aluminum/aluminum blister pack]

Figure 1: Cross-section of new Alu/Alu blister showing foil thickness and sealing layer.

OriginalNew
PVC/PVDC BlisterAlu/Alu Blister
25°C/60% RHUnchanged