The jira specification file appears to be out of date with the versions, artifacts and pages currently defined in the IG. A proposed revised file to be reviewed and, if appropriate, submitted as a pull request against the XML folder in https://github.com/HL7/JIRA-Spec-Artifacts. To see the differences, perform a file compare on 'template/jira-current.xml' (a normalized view of what is in Github) and 'template/jira-new.xml' (reflects current IG content)
ImplementationGuide/hl7.fhir.us.ccda: ImplementationGuide: Validated against fhir.ImplementationGuide
Path
Severity
Message
ImplementationGuide.meta.source (l1/c163)
warning
The URL value '#dMBMcvZsrSDFhHb1' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[1] (l1/c8542)
warning
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.us.core#4.0.0 released on 2021-06-28, but the most recent appropriate version is 8.0.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be consideredIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING_OLD
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[2] (l1/c8695)
warning
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.1.0 released on 2024-04-27, but the most recent appropriate version is 5.2.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be consideredIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING_OLD
ImplementationGuide (l1/c77437)
warning
HL7 Implementation Guides should state their maturity explicitly using the extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-fmmIG_HL7_FMM_SHOULD
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#7jwafzgbwz3cPoym' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#vsazekVhbJUN5DVP' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#CXWcf7GLdy7BZgYk' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#jOiomrQ69OIQipUi' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
Wrong Display Name 'Advance directives' for http://loinc.org#42348-3. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US), 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US) or 'Adv healthcare directives' (en-US) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
Wrong Display Name 'Advance directives' for http://loinc.org#42348-3. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US), 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US) or 'Adv healthcare directives' (en-US) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
Wrong Display Name 'Advance directives' for http://loinc.org#42348-3. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US), 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US) or 'Adv healthcare directives' (en-US) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
Wrong Display Name 'Advance directives' for http://loinc.org#42348-3. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US), 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US) or 'Adv healthcare directives' (en-US) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
No definition could be found for URL value 'urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.22812.3.2009316.3.4.1.2.1'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
Condition.code.coding[1].code (l37/c4)
warning
Unknown Code '486' in the CodeSystem 'http://hl7.org/fhir/sid/icd-9-cm' version '2015' - note that the code system is labeled as a fragment, so the code may be valid in some other fragment (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODE_IN_FRAGMENT
No definition could be found for URL value 'urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.22812.3.2009316.3.4.1.2.1'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
Condition.code.coding[1].code (l40/c4)
warning
Unknown Code '486' in the CodeSystem 'http://hl7.org/fhir/sid/icd-9-cm' version '2015' - note that the code system is labeled as a fragment, so the code may be valid in some other fragment (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODE_IN_FRAGMENT
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#OBOGLY1IcS3QsGrB' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#GNI3ZHMkjDg95t5Z' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#GZdcyuPrL6zv6dDA' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#DEai5xNhh8KqJU2w' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#T77feouCUwFbnN3H' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
Patient.identifier[0].system (l90/c60)
warning
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hospital.smarthealthit.org'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#M6c1wK1icMwvk3Ul' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#kub40Eilc2HLDH2p' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#uHmbKLN3xl8PqGKy' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#EupP8o6u3BWyAdUl' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#hVY6YnnbJ9SDswTw' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#fHnxrwoyrdUYLnFF' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
StructureDefinition.snapshot (l1/c303682)
warning
The slice 'care_plan' on path 'Composition.event.detail' is not marked as 'must-support' which is not consistent with the element that defines the slicing, where 'must-support' is true
The URL value '#j21iyLdl5SyihDjY' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#KLkt9mqJ1KVD1c7X' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The URL value '#tpHisPoQwM38OhgE' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The URL value '#NprCJyaq05GzNeOJ' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#d3bmkvD1SJvgcAtp' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
StructureDefinition.snapshot (l1/c728121)
warning
The slice 'sliceEntry' on path 'Composition.section.entry' is not marked as 'must-support' which is not consistent with the element that defines the slicing, where 'must-support' is true
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#b9WEhafsbLr7h0uf' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The URL value '#A9Jys0rnZ6U9uQpr' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The URL value '#hZbRa2U1Vtc1M6i6' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The URL value '#DpnmBKyxdzf8noQR' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The URL value '#bY1W9IGf5zWYeBRy' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The URL value '#csn482LCsnDWyxbW' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#49QzE2rZjBWNk32p' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#JslZ3iUZTEut4Ehu' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#J5leCsKPn0gyItgS' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#UQHxYsUhbLhPRes1' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#TGF9CHNWdziFGXop' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#8awj3JDXaUCFNlQA' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#af5tUShc5DIhxYJS' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#VmlRX1mG0gTJ10zG' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
The URL value '#tECJbt4f4F0j476q' might be wrong because it appears to point to an internal target, but there is no matching targetTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_URL_INTERNAL_WARN
tx.fhir.org does not support '486' for unknown reasons (0 uses)
Illustrative OID not available for validation in tx.fhir.org as used in C-CDA examples: https://cdasearch.hl7.org/examples/view/Problems/Problem%20Value%2C%20Translation%2C%20Qualifier%20examples This is deliebrately used in this guide to illustrate OID to urn:oid conversion in C-CDA to FHIR when URL is unavailable.
A definition for CodeSystem 'urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.3.247.1.1' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (2 uses)
LOINC radiology codes manually validated
The value set include has too many codes to validate (0), so each individual code has not been checked (0 uses)
Missing performers in examples prior to 2023 ballot. This content is not being balloted and will probably be removed in the next cycle.
Best Practice Recommendation: In general, all observations should have a performer (3 uses)
This extension was deprecated due to composition.version being included in R5. This IG uses R4 so the extension is still necessary for capturing the version.
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0 is deprecated (1 uses)
This is a validator issue, not an IG issue
Source Code System http://loinc.org is only supported on the terminology server, so the source codes are not validated for performance reasons (2 uses)
Source Code System http://snomed.info/sct is only supported on the terminology server, so the source codes are not validated for performance reasons (8 uses)
Target Code System http://loinc.org is only supported on the terminology server, so the target codes are not validated for performance reasons (2 uses)
Target Code System http://snomed.info/sct is only supported on the terminology server, so the target codes are not validated for performance reasons (8 uses)
Unknown Code '486' in the CodeSystem 'http://hl7.org/fhir/sid/icd-9-cm' version '2015' - note that the code system is labeled as a fragment, so the code may be valid in some other fragment
tx.fhir.org does not support '486' for unknown reasons (0 uses)
Unknown Code '486' in the system 'http://hl7.org/fhir/sid/icd-9-cm' version '2015' - note that the code system is labeled as a fragment, so the code may be valid in some other fragment
tx.fhir.org does not support '486' for unknown reasons (0 uses)
Unknown Code '486' in the system 'http://hl7.org/fhir/sid/icd-9-cm' version '2015' - note that the code system is labeled as a fragment, so the code may be valid in some other fragment (from http://tx.fhir.org/r4)
tx.fhir.org does not support '486' for unknown reasons (0 uses)
Wrong Display Name 'Advance directives' for http://loinc.org#42348-3. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US), 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US) or 'Adv healthcare directives' (en-US) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Advance directives' for http://loinc.org#42348-3. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US), 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US) or 'Adv healthcare directives' (en-US) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Advance directives' for http://loinc.org#42348-3. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US), 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US) or 'Adv healthcare directives' (en-US) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Advance directives' for http://loinc.org#42348-3. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US), 'Advance healthcare directives' (en-US) or 'Adv healthcare directives' (en-US) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.us.core#4.0.0 released on 2021-06-28, but the most recent appropriate version is 8.0.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be considered
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.1.0 released on 2024-04-27, but the most recent appropriate version is 5.2.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be considered
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.1.0', found versions: 4.0.1, 5.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/composition-clinicaldocument-versionNumber|5.1.0'
Unknown Code '486' in the CodeSystem 'http://hl7.org/fhir/sid/icd-9-cm' version '2015' - note that the code system is labeled as a fragment, so the code may be valid in some other fragment
Unknown Code '486' in the CodeSystem 'http://hl7.org/fhir/sid/icd-9-cm' version '2015' - note that the code system is labeled as a fragment, so the code may be valid in some other fragment
hl7.fhir.us.ccda
hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4
Reference must be to a ValueSet, but found a CodeSystem instead