Radiation Dose Summary for Diagnostic Procedures on FHIR
0.1.0 - ci-build International flag

Radiation Dose Summary for Diagnostic Procedures on FHIR, published by HL7 Imaging Integration Working Group. This is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 0.1.0). This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/HL7/fhir-radiation-dose-summary-ig/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions

Architecture and Implementation

This chapter describes the different architecture aspects of the resources, profiles and actors identified within the IG.

  1. Profiles & Extensions - FHIR Profiles and extensions defined in the IG
  2. Actors - Actors participating in the IG
  3. Terminology - Value Sets defined
  4. Resources Identifiers - A focus on DICOM identifiers types
  5. Conformance - A focus on the conformance with this IG
  6. Security Consideration - Security aspects to be taken in consideration

Profiles & Extensions

Resource Profiles

Supporting DataType Profiles

There is no special supporting DataType profiles defined by this IG.

Supporting Extensions

There is no special supporting extensions defined by this IG.

Profiles relationship

Profiles relationship


There are two levels or profiles:

  • Radiation Observation profiles: these profiles allow describing a performed radiation act, as seen from modality perspective. They summarize the radiation report generated by the modality. These radiation observation profiles are Radiation Dose Summary and (StructureDefinition-nm-radiation-dose-summary.html), Irradiation Event Summary (they are presented in green in the class diagram above).
  • Radiation Report profiles: these profiles reference the radiation observation resources, and enhance the collected information in a general radiation report, with relationship to the patient conditions and the procedure indications. These reporting profiles are Radiation Summary Report, Indication Observation, and Pregnancy Status (IPS). The two latter profiles contain information collected before patient imaging procedure, which explain the two levels of profiles.

A general Radiation Dose Summary profile is defined. It provides a summary of an irradiation act, related to a performed procedure and a specific equipement. This profile allows to report the radiation data as a structured text following its valueString element. The structure of the text included in valueString is site dependent.

A general Irradiation Event Summary profile is defined. It provides an overview of an irradiation event, related to a perforemd procedure and a specific equipment. Following the analysis of different national and regional recommendations, only a need for CT irradiation events data was found, the details of X-Ray and NM irradiations events were not highlighted as needed during a radiation summary report.

Radiation Dose Summary profiles are using the component element to describe the different parameters of the radiation procedure. We consider that the attributes of the components in the radiation summary resources are part of the resource itself when provided, which cannot be understood without reading the complete different components. Having different Observations referenced in multiple hasMember elements is not useful, as the interpretation of the radiation dose summary resource needs to access to all the different parameters of the radiation procedure.

Actors

A list of actors are identified within this IG:

  • Radiation Dose Summary Producer
  • FHIR Server
  • Radiation Dose Summary Consumer

Actors


Radiation Dose Summary Producer

The Radiation Dose Summary Producer (RDSP) actor is responsible on the creation of the Radiation Dose Summary observation, and sharing it with the FHIR Server. The RDSP actor shall consider synchronizing with the FHIR server multiple resources, in order to avoid duplicating resources in the FHIR server. For example, the RDSP actor shall check if the patient already exists in the FHIR server, and if so, only a reference to this patient is created, and the POST bundle from the RDSP actor to the FHIR server shall not contain a Patient resource. Generally, this actor can be implemented within a Dose Management System.

The RDSP actor can implement the following CapabilityStatement: RDSP capability statement.

The RDSP actor SHALL follow the different security considerations mentionned in security section. Sharing PHI SHALL follow the security regulations followed by the deploying facility.

FHIR Server

The FHIR Server has two functions:

  1. Provide the diagnostic procedure context to both the Radiation Dose Summary Producer and Consumer actors
  2. Store the Radiation Dose Summary resources and Irradiation Event resources from the sharing performed from the Producer actor

Thus, the FHIR server can be divided in fact in two sub-actors: one for the contextual resources, and one for the Radiation Dose resources.

The contextual resources are resources managed by the FHIR server and related to the imaging procedure, and works as a source of truth for these resources:

  1. The Patient resources: the patients having exams.
  2. The Device resources: the modalities participating in the irradiation of the patients.
  3. The Practitioner resources: the irradiation authorizing persons responsible on the performed exams.
  4. The ImagingStudy resources: resources describing the performed exams.

When these resources are not present in the FHIR server, the Radiation Dose Summary Producer can take the responsibility on alimenting the FHIR server with these resources, by creating them from the RDSRs and images collected from modalities.

The FHIR Server is a logical actor which could be part of an EMR related to the patient care. Also, it can be part of the Dose Management System, used to expose radiation summary to third party consumers.

The FHIR server can implement the following CapabilityStatements:

The FHIR server SHALL follow the different security considerations mentionned in security section.

Radiation Dose Summary Consumer

The Radiation Dose Summary Consumer (RDSC) actor is responsible on the collection and interpretation of the Radiation Dose Summary observation. There are many ways to use the Radiation Dose Summary resources, and it depends on the consumer.

  • RIS systems can act as consumer actor, in order to enhance the final radiology report with radiation information.
  • Clinical Decision Support tools can use these radiation resources to feed their algorithms.
  • Clinical Quality Information tools can use these radiation resources to perform analyzes on radiations information, and provide metrics related to patients cohorts, or devices comparison, or limit values calculations, etc.
  • Other consumers may act as a light Dose registry, by collecting the radiation summary information for a patient or a group of patients in a regional or national infrastructure. Such registries can create valuable data for regulations purpose, or for population radiation estimations.

Expertise is needed to understand the radiation dose data. The interpretation of the radiation information collected by the Radiation Dose Summary Consumer shall follow the facility regulations and workflows, in order to avoid misuse.

The RDSC actor can implement the following CapabilityStatement: RDSC capability statement.

The RDSC actor SHALL follow the different security considerations mentionned in security section. Collection of Data from the FHIR Server SHALL follow consent requirements used within the deploying facility, as described in security section.

Actors grouping

The FHIR Server can be grouped with the Radiation Dose Summary Producer actor within the Dose Management System. Thus, the Dose Management System is managing all the resources and references between resources. Another possible grouping is between the FHIR Server and the Radiation Dose Summary Consumer actor. This can happen for example within EMR systems or RIS/EHR systems. In this case, the source of truth for contextual resources are independent from the Radiation Dose Summary Producer.

Actors communication

The following sequence diagram describes the typical workflow between the RDSP actor, the FHIR server, and the RDSC actor.

Actors relationship


During this workflow, a patient arrives to the hospital and performs an exam within an irradiating modality, or including a nuclear medicine administration. The detailed radiation information is shared with the Radiation Dose Summary Producer actor, which may generally be a Dose Management System. During the process of creating the Radiation Dose Summary resources, the RDSP actor performs a list of queries to the FHIR server, in order to collect the right IDs to be referred in the newly created resources. For instance, the RDSP actor shall collect the corresponding IDs for the Patient, the Practitioner, the Modality, and the ImagingStudy resources. Most of these resources can be identified from the DICOM RDSR shared from the modality. Some unique identifiers within the RDSR can be used to query the FHIR server. Here is a mapping between the FHIR resources and the identifiers from DICOM:

FHIR Resource Identifier from DICOM
Patient tag(0010,0020) Patient ID
Practitioner TID 1020(Person Participant).EV (113871, DCM, Person ID)
ImagingStudy tag(0020,000D) Study Instance UID
Device tag(0018,1000) Device Serial Number

The IDs collected are used to construct the Radiation Dose Summary resources and their related Irradiation Event resources. Then, these resources are shared with the FHIR server through a POST of a bundle. The bundle may contain temporary resources related to Patient, ImagingStudy, and other contextual resources, if the FHIR server has no reference of them.

Once the resources are shared with the FHIR server, the Radiation Dose Summary Consumer can search and retrieve the resources from the FHIR server and use them for their own purposes. The RDSC actor can optionally enrich the FHIR server resources by posting a Composition document as profiled by the Radiation Summary Report profile.

Terminology

Value Sets Defined

These Value Sets have been defined for this implementation guide.

  1. Isotopes Value Set
  2. Procedure Reported Type Value Set
  3. Radiopharmaceuticals Value Set
  4. Radiation Dose Summary component type
  5. Irradiation Event component type

Value Sets Used

DICOM ValueSet links:

  1. CID 4030 CT, MR and PET Anatomy Imaged
  2. CID 4052 Phantom Devices
  3. CID 33 Modality
  4. CID 11 Route of Administration
  5. CID 25 Radiopharmaceuticals
  6. CID 4021 PET Radiopharmaceutical
  7. CID 18 Isotopes in Radiopharmaceuticals
  8. CID 4020 PET Radionuclide

Code Systems Defined

One new code system is defined under this IG:

  1. DICOM Identifier Type

Code Systems Used

This implementation guide draws on a number of formal code systems.

The following table presents the external code systems (and naming conventions) adopted in this implementation guide:

Code System Key Code System Name Code System Application
LOINC Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes http://loinc.org Observation and laboratory codes
SNOMED CT Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms http://snomed.info/sct Procedures, anatomy, products, isotopes
DCM DICOM http://dicom.nema.org/resources/ontology/DCM Devices, products, radiation information

Value Sets strength

The following table summarizes the mapping between defined profiles and Value sets strength :

Profile Element path Value Set Strength Strength Justification
Irradiation Event Summary component.code Components’ Code for Irradiation Event extensible to keep the possibility to extend the list of reported components
Modality Device type CID 33 Modality required VS contains the exhaustive list of modality types
Radiation Dose Summary component.code Components’ Code for Radiation Dose Summary extensible to keep the possibility to extend the list of reported components
Radiation Dose Summary component:procedureReported Procedure Reported Type Value Set required procedure reported component is the distinguisher of irradiation type

Resources Identifiers

Many profiles defined in this IG are using DICOM IDs and UIDs as identifiers for the resources. In this paragraph, we summarize the different IDs and UIDs used, and the way they should be exposed in FHIR resources:

Profile Identifier Identifier.system Identifier.type.code Identifier.type.system Identifier.type.display DICOM Tag Mapping
Modality Device identifier:deviceSerialNumber   SNO HL7 IdentifierType Serial Number (0018,1000) Device Serial Number
Modality Device identifier:aeTitle   application-entity DICOM Identifier Type Application Entity N/A
Modality Device identifier:deviceUID urn:dicom:uid device-uid DICOM Identifier Type Device UID (0018,1002) Device UID
Modality Device identifier:deviceID   device-id DICOM Identifier Type Device ID (0018,1003) Device ID
Radiation Dose Summary identifier:radiationSRUID urn:dicom:uid sop-instance-uid DICOM Identifier Type SOP Instance UID (0008,0018) SOP Instance UID
Radiation Dose Summary partOf.identifier urn:dicom:uid study-instance-uid DICOM Identifier Type Study Instance UID (0020,000D) Study Instance UID
Radiation Dose Summary basedOn.identifier   ACSN HL7 IdentifierType Accession ID (0008,0050) Accession Number

Following the notes within the ImagingStudy resource - When encoding a DICOM UID in an Identifier datatype, use the Identifier system of “urn:dicom:uid” - the identifiers related to DICOM tags having the Value Representation (VR) of type UID, shall have the type.system=urn:dicom:uid.

Here some examples :

  • Irradiation Event UID :
"identifier": [
    {
        "type": {
            "coding": [
                {
                    "system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/radiation-dose-summary/CodeSystem/dicom-identifier-type",
                    "code": "irradiation-event-uid",
                    "display": "Irradiation Event UID"
                }
            ]
        },
        "system": "urn:dicom:uid",
        "value": "urn:oid:1.2.840.121.3.32.0.1.1323423.2"
    }
]
  • Application Entity :
"identifier": [
    {
        "type": {
            "coding": [
                {
                    "system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/radiation-dose-summary/CodeSystem/dicom-identifier-type",
                    "code": "application-entity",
                    "display": "Application Entity"
                }
            ]
        },
        "value": "XA01"
    }
]

Conformance

Conventions

This implementation guide uses specific terminology to flag statements that have relevance for the evaluation of conformance with the guide:

  • SHALL indicates requirements that must be met to be conformant with the specification.
  • SHOULD indicates behaviors that are strongly recommended (and which may result in interoperability issues or sub-optimal behavior if not adhered to), but which do not, for this version of the specification, affect the determination of specification conformance.
  • MAY describes optional behaviors that are free to consider but where the is no recommendation for or against adoption.

Claiming Conformance

Actors and Systems asserting conformance to this implementation guide have to implement the requirements outlined in the corresponding capability statements. The following definition of MUST SUPPORT is to be used in the implementation of the requirements.

Must Support

In the context of this IG, mustSupport on any data element SHALL be interpreted as follows:

  • When creating Radiation Dose Summary content, implementers SHALL be capable of including mustSupport data elements.
  • When receiving Radiation Dose Summary content, implementers:
    • SHALL be capable of processing resource instances containing mustSupport data elements without generating an error or causing the application to fail.
    • SHOULD be capable of displaying mustSupport data elements for human use, or processing (e.g., storing) them for other purposes.

Security Consideration

Exchanging Radiation summary resources makes use of patient-specific information which could be exploited by malicious actors resulting in exposure of patient data. For these reasons, all data exchange between the different actors must be secured appropriately with access to limited authorized individuals, data protected in transit, and appropriate audit measures taken.

Implementers SHOULD be aware of these security considerations associated with FHIR transactions, particularly those related to:

These security requirements are highlighted in the context of this IG:

  • Systems SHALL keep audit logs of the various transactions. Some auditing workflows can be used like IHE ATNA or RESTful ATNA.
  • Systems SHALL use TLS version 1.2 or higher for all transmissions not taking place over a secure network connection. IHE ATNA may be followed for the TLS usage.
  • Systems SHALL conform to FHIR Communications Security requirements.
  • Systems SHALL implement consent requirements per their country, state, local, and institutional policies.