Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide
1.0.0-ballot - ballot International flag

Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide, published by HL7 International / Clinical Decision Support. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 1.0.0-ballot built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/HL7/ebm/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions

CodeSystem: Recommendation Justification Code System (Experimental)

Official URL: https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/27834 Version: 1.0.0-ballot
Active as of 2022-02-16 Computable Name: CodeSystemRecommendationJustification
Other Identifiers: FEvIR Object Identifier: 27834

Copyright/Legal: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

This resource (this entire set of content) is being used for active development of a code system to support a RecommendationJustification Profile of ArtifactAssessment Resource. This code system is not yet released for expected use and may not be stable. This resource may be used for the continuous development of the code system, and published versions of the code system (when ready) may be published as separate resources with stable identifiers.

This Code system is referenced in the content logical definition of the following value sets:

Properties

This code system defines the following properties for its concepts

CodeTypeDescription
comment string Comment for application
editors string Term/Definition Editors
approval string Expert Working Group Agreement
negative-vote string Expert Working Group Disagreement
expert-comments string Expert Working Group Comments
change-for-vote string Proposed Change for Future Vote
multiple-parents string Has more than one parent term (IS-A relationship)
deprecated string Removed from to-be-published versions of the code system

Concepts

This case-insensitive code system https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/27834 defines the following codes in a Grouped By hierarchy:

LvlCodeDisplayDefinition
1 RJCS-Domain1 Domain This is a group of terms to define the concept being rated or classified
2   RJCS-1001 Certainty of Evidence Certainty of Evidence
2   RJCS-1002 Competing Interests Competing Interests
2   RJCS-1003 Problem Importance Problem Importance
2   RJCS-1004 Desirable Effects Desirable Effects
2   RJCS-1005 Undesirable Effects Undesirable Effects
2   RJCS-1006 Values/Preferences Values/Preferences
2   RJCS-1007 Net Effect Net Effect
2   RJCS-1008 Resources/Costs Resources/Costs
2   RJCS-1009 Cost-effectiveness Cost-effectiveness
2   RJCS-1010 Equity Equity
2   RJCS-1011 Acceptability Acceptability
2   RJCS-1012 Feasibility Feasibility
2   RJCS-1000 Strength of Recommendation Strength of Recommendation
2   RJCS-1013 Justification Justification
2   RJCS-1014 Direction of Recommendation Direction of Recommendation
2   RJCS-1015 Population Population
2   RJCS-1016 Action Action
2   RJCS-1017 Opposite Action Opposite Action
2   RJCS-1018 Application Detail Application Detail
2   RJCS-1019 Subgroup Considerations Subgroup Considerations
2   RJCS-1020 Implementation Considerations Implementation Considerations
2   RJCS-1021 Monitoring Considerations Monitoring Considerations
2   RJCS-1022 Research Priorities Research Priorities
2   RJCS-content0 Recommendation Specification Recommendation Specification as content.type
2   RJCS-content1 Evidence Evidence as content.type
2   RJCS-content2old Justification Justification as content.type
2   RJCS-content3 Considerations Considerations as content.type
2   RJCS-content2 Judgments Judgments as content.type
1 RJCS-Domain2 Rating This is a group of terms to define qualities (ratings, classifier values) of the concept being rated or classified
2   RJCS-2001 Strong expectation Strong expectation for strength of recommendation
2   RJCS-2002 Weak expectation Weak expectation for strength of recommendation
2   RJCS-2003 High certainty High certainty or quality of or confidence in the evidence for
2   RJCS-2004 Moderate certainty Moderate certainty or quality of or confidence in the evidence for
2   RJCS-2005 Low certainty Low certainty or quality of or confidence in the evidence for
2   RJCS-2006 Very low certainty Very low certainty or quality of or confidence in the evidence for
2   RJCS-2007 Yes Yes
2   RJCS-2008 Probably yes Probably yes
2   RJCS-2009 Probably no Probably no
2   RJCS-2010 No No
2   RJCS-2011 Varies Varies
2   RJCS-2012 Unknown Unknown
2   RJCS-2013 Large size Large size
2   RJCS-2014 Moderate size Moderate size
2   RJCS-2015 Small size Small size
2   RJCS-2016 Trivial size Trivial size
2   RJCS-2006.0 No evidence No evidence
2   RJCS-2017 Important uncertainty or variability Important uncertainty or variability
2   RJCS-2018 Possibly important uncertainty or variability Possibly important uncertainty or variability
2   RJCS-2019 Possibly no important uncertainty or variability Possibly no important uncertainty or variability
2   RJCS-2020 No important uncertainty or variability No important uncertainty or variability
2   RJCS-2021 Favors intervention Favors intervention
2   RJCS-2022 Possibly favors intervention Possibly favors intervention
2   RJCS-2023 Does not favor intervention or comparison Does not favor intervention or comparison
2   RJCS-2024 Possibly favors comparison Possibly favors comparison
2   RJCS-2025 Favors comparison Favors comparison
2   RJCS-2026 Large costs Large costs
2   RJCS-2027 Moderate costs Moderate costs
2   RJCS-2028 Negligible costs or savings Negligible costs or savings
2   RJCS-2029 Moderate savings Moderate savings
2   RJCS-2030 Large savings Large savings