FHIR CI-Build

This is the Continuous Integration Build of FHIR (will be incorrect/inconsistent at times).
See the Directory of published versions

Example EventDefinition/example-periodic (JSON)

Responsible Owner: Clinical Decision Support Work GroupStandards Status: InformativeCompartments: No defined compartments

Raw JSON (canonical form + also see JSON Format Specification)

Example of an EventDefinition using the periodic approach.

{
  "resourceType" : "EventDefinition",
  "id" : "example-periodic",
  "extension" : [{
    "url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-standards-status",
    "valueCode" : "informative"
  },
  {
    "url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-fmm",
    "valueInteger" : 6
  },
  {
    "url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg",
    "valueCode" : "cds"
  },
  {
    "url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/cqf-library",
    "valueCanonical" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/EventDefinition/ExampleEventDefinitionLogic"
  }],
  "url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/EventDefinition/example-periodic",
  "name" : "PeriodicEventDefinitionExample",
  "title" : "Periodic EventDefinition Example",
  "status" : "draft",
  "experimental" : true,
  "publisher" : "HL7 International / Clinical Decision Support",
  "contact" : [{
    "telecom" : [{
      "system" : "url",
      "value" : "http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/dss"
    }]
  }],
  "description" : "Example of an EventDefinition using the periodic event approach.",
  "purpose" : "Monitor when 3 consecutive negative stick tests have occurred using a periodic event.",
  "trigger" : [{
    "type" : "periodic",
    "timingTiming" : {
      "repeat" : {
        "frequency" : 1,
        "period" : 3,
        "periodUnit" : "h"
      }
    },
    "condition" : {
      "language" : "text/cql-expression",
      "expression" : "StickTest.within(3 hours).consecutively.take(3).negative().count() = 3"
    }
  }]
}

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.