SGHI FHIR Profile Implementation Guide
0.1.0 - ci-build

SGHI FHIR Profile Implementation Guide, published by Kathurima Kimathi. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 0.1.0 built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/savannahghi/sil_fhir_profile_ig/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions

StructureMap: Procedure Consent Extraction

Official URL: https://fhir.slade360.co.ke/fhir/StructureMap/ExtractProcedureConsent Version: 0.1.0
Active as of 2026-09-14 Computable Name: ExtractProcedureConsent

The three consent forms out as one Consent, with a provision per authorisation actually given: the procedure itself, the further-measures clause, the anaesthesia clause, and on an endoscopy form the tissue-disposal clause and each procedure ticked. Each provision is written only when its box was answered yes, so a consent nobody gave never appears as one. An Observation records whether the explanation was given in a language the person consenting understood, because that is what makes the consent informed and what an audit or a complaint turns on.

/// url = 'https://fhir.slade360.co.ke/fhir/StructureMap/ExtractProcedureConsent'
/// name = 'ExtractProcedureConsent'
/// title = 'Procedure Consent Extraction'
/// status = 'active'
/// description = 'The three consent forms out as one Consent, with a provision per authorisation actually given: the procedure itself, the further-measures clause, the anaesthesia clause, and on an endoscopy form the tissue-disposal clause and each procedure ticked. Each provision is written only when its box was answered yes, so a consent nobody gave never appears as one. An Observation records whether the explanation was given in a language the person consenting understood, because that is what makes the consent informed and what an audit or a complaint turns on.'

uses "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/QuestionnaireResponse" alias QR as source
uses "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Bundle" alias Bundle as target
uses "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Consent" alias Consent as target
uses "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Observation" alias Observation as target

group ExtractProcedureConsent(source qr : QR, target bundle : Bundle) {
  qr -> bundle.type = 'transaction' "setBundleType";
  // ── The Consent ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
  // Guarded on the person consenting having actually signed. Everything below
  // hangs off that signature, and a Consent built from a half-filled form
  // asserts a permission that was never given.
  qr where (item.where(linkId = 'signatures').item.where(linkId = 'signatures/consenter-signed').answer.value = true) ->  bundle.entry as entry,  entry.resource = create('Consent') as consent then {
    qr ->  consent,  entry then BuildConsentBase(qr, consent, entry) "base";
    qr -> consent.status = 'active' "status";
    qr -> consent.decision = 'permit' "decision";
    qr -> consent.category as cat then {
      qr -> cat.coding as cg then {
        qr -> cg.system = 'http://loinc.org' "sys";
        qr -> cg.code = '64293-4' "cd";
        qr -> cg.display = 'Procedure consent Document' "dsp";
      } "coding";
    } "category";
    // The signing time, from the form. Not qr.authored: a consent taken the
    // evening before an operation and transcribed the next morning would
    // otherwise be dated to the transcription, which is the one date a dispute
    // about consent turns on.
    qr.item as sg where (linkId = 'signatures') then {
      sg.item as it where ((linkId = 'signatures/consenter-signed-at') and answer.value.exists()) then {
        it.answer first as a then {
          // The form asks for a date *and time* signed, and Consent.date is a
          // `date`. The timestamp goes to Consent.period.start, which keeps it:
          // a consent taken the evening before theatre and one taken in the
          // anaesthetic room are hours apart and share a date.
          a.value as t ->  consent.period as per,  per.start = t "signedPeriodStart";
        };
      } "signedAtRule";
    } "signaturesGroup";
    // Who explained it becomes the verifier -- they attested that the
    // discussion happened -- and who consented becomes the grantor.
    qr.item as eg where (linkId = 'explained-by') then {
      eg.item as it where ((linkId = 'explained-by/clinician') and answer.value.exists()) then {
        it.answer first as a then {
          a.value as ref -> consent.verification as ver then {
            ref -> ver.verified = true "verified";
            ref -> ver.verifiedBy = ref "verifiedBy";
          } "verification";
        };
      } "clinicianRule";
      eg.item as it where ((linkId = 'explained-by/what-was-explained') and answer.value.exists()) then {
        it.answer first as a then {
          a.value as txt ->  consent.provision as prov,  prov.code as pc,  pc.text = txt "explanationProvision";
        };
      } "explanationRule";
    } "explainedByGroup";
    qr.item as cg2 where (linkId = 'consenter') then {
      cg2.item as it where ((linkId = 'consenter/name') and answer.value.exists()) then {
        it.answer first as a then {
          a.value as txt ->  consent.grantor = create('Reference') as ref,  ref.display = txt "grantorDisplay";
        };
      } "consenterNameRule";
      cg2.item as it where ((linkId = 'consenter/relationship') and answer.value.exists()) then {
        it.answer first as a then {
          a.value as txt ->  consent.grantor = create('Reference') as ref,  ref.display = txt "relationshipDisplay";
        };
      } "relationshipRule";
    } "consenterGroup";
    // ── The provisions ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
    // One per authorisation. The procedure itself is always a provision, since
    // it is what the form exists for; the rest appear only where their own box
    // was answered yes.
    qr.item as g where (linkId = 'consent-for') then {
      g.item as it where ((linkId = 'consent-for/procedure') and answer.value.exists()) -> consent.provision as prov then {
        it.answer first as a then {
          a.value as txt ->  prov.code as pc,  pc.text = txt "procedureText";
        };
      } "procedureProvision";
      g.item as it where ((linkId = 'consent-for/planned-for') and answer.value.exists()) then {
        it.answer first as a then {
          a.value as d ->  consent.period as per,  per.start = cast(d, 'dateTime') "plannedPeriodStart";
        };
      } "plannedForRule";
    } "consentForGroup";
    qr.item as g where (linkId = 'additional-authorisations') then {
      g.item as it where ((linkId = 'additional-authorisations/further-measures') and (answer.value.ofType(Coding).code = 'Y')) -> consent.provision as prov then {
        it ->  prov.code as pc,  pc.text = 'Further alternative operative measures or treatment found necessary during the procedure' "furtherMeasuresText";
      } "furtherMeasuresProvision";
      g.item as it where ((linkId = 'additional-authorisations/anaesthesia') and (answer.value.ofType(Coding).code = 'Y')) -> consent.provision as prov then {
        it ->  prov.code as pc,  pc.text = 'Administration of general or other anaesthesia' "anaesthesiaText";
      } "anaesthesiaProvision";
      g.item as it where ((linkId = 'additional-authorisations/no-named-practitioner') and (answer.value.ofType(Coding).code = 'Y')) then {
        it ->  consent.provision as prov,  prov.code as pc,  pc.text = 'The person consenting understands no assurance has been given that a particular practitioner will perform the procedure.' "noNamedPractitionerNote";
      } "noNamedPractitionerRule";
    } "additionalAuthorisationsGroup";
    // Endoscopy: one provision per procedure ticked, so a consent for an upper
    // GI endoscopy alone cannot be read as covering a colonoscopy.
    qr.item as it where (linkId = 'endoscopy-procedures') then {
      it.answer as a -> consent.provision as prov then {
        a.value as cv -> prov.code as pc then {
          cv -> pc.coding = cv "coding";
          cv.display as d -> pc.text = d "text";
        } "endoscopyCode";
      } "endoscopyProvision";
    } "endoscopyProceduresGroup";
    qr.item as it where ((linkId = 'endoscopy-tissue-disposal') and (answer.value.ofType(Coding).code = 'Y')) -> consent.provision as prov then {
      it ->  prov.code as pc,  pc.text = 'Examination, preservation or disposal of tissues and body fluids removed, and of X-ray or photographic records taken' "tissueDisposalText";
    } "tissueDisposalProvision";
    // Systemic anti-cancer therapy: the regimen is the provision, and the
    // purpose and side effects explained are notes on the consent -- they are
    // what was said, not what was permitted.
    qr.item as g where (linkId = 'anti-cancer-therapy') then {
      g.item as it where ((linkId = 'anti-cancer-therapy/regimen') and answer.value.exists()) -> consent.provision as prov then {
        it.answer first as a then {
          a.value as txt ->  prov.code as pc,  pc.text = txt "regimenText";
        };
      } "regimenProvision";
      g.item as it where ((linkId = 'anti-cancer-therapy/intended-purpose') and answer.value.exists()) then {
        it.answer first as a then {
          a.value as txt ->  consent.provision as prov,  prov.code as pc,  pc.text = txt "purposeProvision";
        };
      } "purposeRule";
      g.item as it where ((linkId = 'anti-cancer-therapy/side-effects-and-risks') and answer.value.exists()) then {
        it.answer first as a then {
          a.value as txt ->  consent.provision as prov,  prov.code as pc,  pc.text = txt "sideEffectsProvision";
        };
      } "sideEffectsRule";
    } "antiCancerGroup";
  } "createConsent";
  // ── Was it explained in a language they understood? ─────────────────────
  // Its own Observation. It is not a permission, so it is not a provision; but
  // it is the fact that makes the consent informed, and a complaint or an
  // inquest turns on it. An interpreter's name, where one was used, rides
  // alongside as a note.
  qr.item as g where (linkId = 'explained-by') then {
    g.item as it where ((linkId = 'explained-by/language-understood') and answer.value.exists()) ->  bundle.entry as entry,  entry.resource = create('Observation') as obs then {
      qr ->  obs,  entry then BuildObsBase(qr, obs, entry) "base";
      qr -> obs then SetSurveyCategory(qr, obs) "category";
      it -> obs.code as cc then {
        it -> cc.coding as cg then {
          it -> cg.system = 'https://fhir.slade360.co.ke/fhir/CodeSystem/inpatient-clinical-concept-codesystem' "sys";
          it -> cg.code = 'capacity-to-consent' "cd";
          it -> cg.display = 'Capacity to consent' "dsp";
        } "coding";
        it -> cc.text = 'Explained in a language the person consenting fully understands' "codeText";
      } "code";
      it.answer first as a then {
        a.value as cv -> obs.value = create('CodeableConcept') as vc then {
          cv -> vc.coding = cv "valueCoding";
          cv.display as d -> vc.text = d "valueText";
        } "codedValue";
      };
      it.answer first as a then {
        a.value as cv where (code = 'N') -> obs.interpretation as interp then {
          cv -> interp.coding as icg then {
            cv -> icg.system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ObservationInterpretation' "sys";
            cv -> icg.code = 'A' "cd";
            cv -> icg.display = 'Abnormal' "dsp";
          } "coding";
        } "notUnderstoodInterp";
      } "languageInterpretation";
      g.item as ip where ((linkId = 'explained-by/interpreter-name') and answer.value.exists()) then {
        ip.answer first as a then {
          a.value as txt ->  obs.note as n,  n.text = txt "interpreterNote";
        };
      } "interpreterRule";
    } "languageObservation";
  } "languageGroup";
}

// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
// Shared scaffolding. Repeated in each map rather than imported: the transform
// engine resolves `imports` against whatever StructureMaps happen to be on the
// server, and a form that stops extracting because a shared map was not
// uploaded is a worse failure than a duplicated group.
// Two notes on what the publisher's StructureMap validator says about this file.
// Source parameters below are left untyped on purpose. Writing `: Element` makes
// the validator compare QuestionnaireResponse.item against the literal 'Element'
// and report them as incompatible with each other, which is noise, not a finding.
// `evaluate(context, expression)` is flagged as "takes 1 parameter but 2 were
// found". Leave it. The FML parser in the same jar refuses the one-argument form
// outright -- it wants a parameter, a comma, then the FHIRPath -- so the
// publisher is objecting to what its own compiler emits. Two arguments is the
// only form that compiles, and it is what the R5 transform engine executes.
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
group BuildObsBase(source qr : QR, target obs : Observation, target entry) {
  qr -> obs then SetResponseProvenance(qr, obs) "responseProvenance";
  qr -> obs.id = uuid() then SetObservationFullUrl(obs, entry) "idAndFullUrl";
  qr -> entry.request as request then {
    qr -> request.method = 'POST' "requestMethod";
    qr -> request.url = 'Observation' "requestUrl";
  } "entryRequest";
  qr -> obs.status = 'final' "status";
  qr.subject as s -> obs.subject = s;
  qr.encounter as e -> obs.encounter = e;
  qr.authored as t -> obs.effective = t "effective";
  qr.source as src -> obs.performer = src "performerFromSource";
  qr where (source.exists().not()) then {
    qr.author as a -> obs.performer = a "performerFromAuthor";
  } "performerFallback";
  // A stored response's id already reads "QuestionnaireResponse/<id>", so it is
  // a relative reference as it stands. The hasValue() guard is what stops an
  // unsaved response -- one posted straight to $extract rather than saved first
  // -- from writing "QuestionnaireResponse/null" into the record.
  qr.id as qid where ($this.hasValue()) ->  obs.derivedFrom = create('Reference') as ref,  ref.reference = qid "linkQuestionnaireResponse";
}

group SetObservationFullUrl(source obs : Observation, target entry) {
  obs.id as id -> entry.fullUrl = append('https://fhir.slade360.co.ke/fhir/Observation/', id) "assignFullUrl";
}

// The two answer shapes a component can carry. Both read the answer through the
// untyped `.value` accessor: reading `valueCoding` or `valueQuantity` by its
// typed property name fails at transform time on HAPI R5 with "Attempt to read
// invalid property ... on QuestionnaireResponse.item.answer".
group SetComponentCodedValue(source it, target comp) {
  it.answer first as a then {
    a.value as cv -> comp.value = create('CodeableConcept') as cc then {
      cv -> cc.coding = cv "valueCoding";
      cv.display as d -> cc.text = d "valueText";
    } "codedValue";
  } "componentAnswer";
}

group SetComponentValue(source it, target comp) {
  it.answer first as a then {
    a.value as v -> comp.value = v "plainValue";
  } "componentAnswer";
}

group SetSurveyCategory(source qr : QR, target obs : Observation) {
  qr -> obs.category as cat then {
    qr -> cat.coding as coding then {
      qr -> coding.system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/observation-category' "categorySystem";
      qr -> coding.code = 'survey' "categoryCode";
      qr -> coding.display = 'Survey' "categoryDisplay";
    } "categoryCoding";
  } "category";
}

group BuildConsentBase(source qr : QR, target r : Consent, target entry) {
  qr -> r then SetResponseProvenance(qr, r) "responseProvenance";
  qr -> r.id = uuid() then SetConsentFullUrl(r, entry) "idAndFullUrl";
  qr -> entry.request as request then {
    qr -> request.method = 'POST' "requestMethod";
    qr -> request.url = 'Consent' "requestUrl";
  } "entryRequest";
  qr.subject as s -> r.subject = s;
}

group SetConsentFullUrl(source r : Consent, target entry) {
  r.id as id -> entry.fullUrl = append('https://fhir.slade360.co.ke/fhir/Consent/', id) "assignFullUrl";
}

// ── Provenance and tenancy ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
// Two tags on everything this map creates. The first says which questionnaire
// produced it, so a form that reopens mid-admission recalls its own earlier
// entries and not another form's. The second copies the tenant tags off the
// response, because nothing else on the path puts them there.
// The code is the form's document type, not the questionnaire's id: every
// environment mints its own ids, and there is only one set of maps, so an id
// here would tie the tag to whichever environment stamped it.
// ── Provenance and tenancy ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
group SetResponseProvenance(source qr : QR, target r) {
  qr -> r.meta as m then {
    qr -> m.tag as t then {
      qr -> t.system = 'http://slade360edi.com/questionnaire-provenance' "provenanceSystem";
      qr -> t.code = 'procedure-consent' "provenanceCode";
      qr -> t.display = 'Consent for a procedure or treatment' "provenanceDisplay";
    } "provenanceTag";
  } "provenanceMeta";
  // Every tag the response carries, onto the resource. `meta` is 0..1, so this
  // lands on the same meta the rule above created rather than a second one.
  qr.meta as qm then {
    qm.tag as qt ->  r.meta as m,  m.tag = qt "copyTag";
  } "tenantTags";
}