AU eRequesting Implementation Guide
0.2.0-ci-build - CI Build Australia flag

AU eRequesting Implementation Guide, published by HL7 Australia. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 0.2.0-ci-build built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/hl7au/au-fhir-erequesting/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions

Resource Profile: AUeRequestingTask - Mappings

Page standards status: Draft Maturity Level: 0

Mappings for the au-erequesting-task resource profile.

Mappings for Workflow Pattern (http://hl7.org/fhir/workflow)

AUeRequestingTask
TaskRequest, Event
   identifierRequest.identifier, Event.identifier
   instantiatesCanonicalRequest.instantiatesCanonical, Event.instantiatesCanonical
   instantiatesUriEvent.instantiatesUrl
   basedOnRequest.basedOn, Event.basedOn
   partOfEvent.partOf
   statusRequest.status, Event.status
   intentRequest.intent
   priorityRequest.priority
   codeRequest.code, Event.code
   forRequest.subject, Event.subject
   encounterRequest.context, Event.context
   executionPeriodEvent.occurrence[x]
   authoredOnRequest.authoredOn
   requesterRequest.requester
   performerTypeEvent.performer.role, Request.performerType
   ownerEvent.performer.actor, Request.performer
   locationRequest.reasonCode, Event.reasonCode
   reasonCodeEvent.location
   reasonReferenceRequest.reasonReference, Event.reasonReference
   insuranceRequest.insurance
   noteRequest.note, Event.note
   relevantHistoryRequest.relevantHistory

Mappings for RIM Mapping (http://hl7.org/v3)

AUeRequestingTask
TaskEntity. Role, or Act, ControlAct[moodCode=INT]
   textAct.text?
   containedN/A
   extensionN/A
   modifierExtensionN/A
   identifier.id
   instantiatesCanonical.outboundRelationship[typeCode=DEFN].target
   instantiatesUri.outboundRelationship[typeCode=DEFN].target
   basedOn.outboundRelationship[typeCode=FLFS].target[moodCode=INT]
   groupIdentifiern/a, II - The Identifier class is a little looser than the v3 type II because it allows URIs as well as registered OIDs or GUIDs. Also maps to Role[classCode=IDENT]
      idn/a
      extensionn/a
      useRole.code or implied by context
      typeRole.code or implied by context
         idn/a
         extensionn/a
         codingunion(., ./translation)
         text./originalText[mediaType/code="text/plain"]/data
      systemII.root or Role.id.root
      valueII.extension or II.root if system indicates OID or GUID (Or Role.id.extension or root)
      periodRole.effectiveTime or implied by context
      assignerII.assigningAuthorityName but note that this is an improper use by the definition of the field. Also Role.scoper
         idn/a
         extensionn/a
         referenceN/A
         typeN/A
         identifier.identifier
         displayN/A
   partOf.inboundRelationship[typeCode=COMP].source[moodCode=INT]
   status.statusCode
   statusReason.inboundRelationship[typeCode=SUBJ].source[classCode=CACT, moodCode=EVN, code="status change"].reasonCode
   businessStatus.inboundRelationship[typeCode=SUBJ].source[classCode=OBS, moodCode=EVN, code="business status"]
   intent.moodCode
   priority.priorityCode
   code.code
   description.text
   focus.outboundRelationship[typeCode=SUBJ].target
   for.participation[typeCode=RCT].role
   encounter.inboundRelationship[typeCode=COMP].source[classCode=PCPR, moodCode=EVN]
   executionPeriod.effectiveTime
   authoredOn.participation[typeCode=AUT].time
   lastModified.inboundRelationship[typeCode=SUBJ, ].source[classCode=CACT, moodCode=EVN].effectiveTime
   requester.participation[typeCode=AUT].role
   performerType.participation[typeCode=PRF].role.code
   owner.participation[typeCode=PRF].role
   location.participation[typeCode=LOC].role
   reasonCode.reasonCode
   reasonReference.outboundRelationship[typeCode=RSON].target
   insurance.outboundRelationship[typeCode=COVBY].target
   note.inboundRelationship[typeCode=SUBJ, ].source[classCode=OBS, moodCode=EVN, code="annotation"].value(string)
   relevantHistory.inboundRelationship(typeCode=SUBJ].source[classCode=CACT, moodCode=EVN]
   restrictionInstead of pointing to request, would point to component of request, having these characteristics
      idn/a
      extensionn/a
      modifierExtensionN/A
      repetitions.repeatNumber
      period.effectiveTime(IVL<TS>)
      recipient.participation[typeCode=SBJ].role
   input???
      idn/a
      extensionn/a
      modifierExtensionN/A
      type???
      value[x]???
   output???
      idn/a
      extensionn/a
      modifierExtensionN/A
      type???
      value[x]???

Mappings for FiveWs Pattern Mapping (http://hl7.org/fhir/fivews)

AUeRequestingTask
Task
   identifierFiveWs.identifier
   statusFiveWs.status
   intentFiveWs.class
   priorityFiveWs.grade
   codeFiveWs.what[x]
   focusFiveWs.what[x]
   forFiveWs.subject[x], FiveWs.subject
   encounterFiveWs.context
   executionPeriodFiveWs.done[x]
   authoredOnFiveWs.recorded
   requesterFiveWs.author
   performerTypeFiveWs.actor
   ownerFiveWs.actor
   locationFiveWs.where[x]
   reasonCodeFiveWs.why[x]
   reasonReferenceFiveWs.why[x]

Mappings for HL7 v2 Mapping (http://hl7.org/v2)

AUeRequestingTask
Task
   groupIdentifierCX / EI (occasionally, more often EI maps to a resource id or a URL)
      useN/A
      typeCX.5
         codingC*E.1-8, C*E.10-22
         textC*E.9. But note many systems use C*E.2 for this
      systemCX.4 / EI-2-4
      valueCX.1 / EI.1
      periodCX.7 + CX.8
      assignerCX.4 / (CX.4,CX.9,CX.10)
   reasonCodeEVN.7
   insuranceIN1/IN2