Finnish Scheduling
0.2.0-cibuild - ci-build
Finnish Scheduling
0.2.0-cibuild - ci-build
Finnish Scheduling, published by HL7 Finland. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 0.2.0-cibuild built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/fhir-fi/finnish-scheduling/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions
| Official URL: https://hl7.fi/fhir/finnish-scheduling/ConceptMap/appointment-status-concept-map | Version: 0.2.0-cibuild | |||
| Draft as of 2024-09-01 | Computable Name: | |||
Mapping between the Finnish logical model Ajanvaraus - Ajanvarauksen tila (oid 1.2.246.537.6.881) and FHIR Appoinment status codes, in both directions.
The Finnish logical model for appointments includes a code set for appointment statuses that differs from the FHIR Appointment.status values.
The Finnish logical model is more detailed when the service is being planned, and separates between states where the need fo a service has been identified but no service provider has yet been identified (#1, Suunniteltu), and when the service provider has been selected (#2, Tilattu).
The FHIR specification uses the Appoinment resource to track information on scheduling and for administrative purposes, and the Encounter resource to track any clinically relevant information (see Appointment Statuses and Encounters). In FHIR, when an encounter starts, its state is tracked with the Encounter resource, and no longer with the Appointment.
The Finnish logical model does not make such a distinction. The same value set records states for when the encounter has started (#6, Alkanut) and when the service is in progress or completed (#7, Toteutunut).
The Finnish logical model does not have a separate state for when the patient has arrived (FHIR
status #arrived). It does have a code #10 Ilmoittautunut that matches the FHIR code
#checked-in.
The Finnish logical model used to have a separate code for an appointment that has been rescheduled (#5, Siirretty), but that code is now deprecated.
The Finnish logical model does not have any code for appointments that have been entered in error.
Generated Narrative: ConceptMap appointment-status-concept-map
Mapping from https://koodistopalvelu.kanta.fi/codeserver/pages/classification-view-page.xhtml?classificationKey=1943 to http://hl7.org/fhir/appointmentstatus
Group 1 Mapping from https://koodistopalvelu.kanta.fi/codeserver/pages/classification-view-page.xhtml?classificationKey=1943 to AppointmentStatus
| Source Concept Details | Relationship | Target Concept Details | Comment | Properties | |||
| Codes from https://koodistopalvelu.kanta.fi/codeserver/pages/classification-view-page.xhtml?classificationKey=1943 | Codes from AppointmentStatus | ||||||
| 1 | Suunniteltu | is equivalent to | waitlist | Waitlisted | In FHIR there is no distinction between Suunniteltu and Tilattu. The distinction is that in Tilattu the service provider has been identified. | ||
| 2 | Tilattu | maps to wider concept | waitlist | Waitlisted | In FHIR there is no distinction between Suunniteltu and Tilattu. The distinction is that in Tilattu the service provider has been identified. | ||
| 3 | Varattu | is equal to | booked | Booked | |||
| 4 | Peruttu | is equal to | cancelled | Cancelled | |||
| 5 | Siirretty | (not mapped) | |||||
| 6 | Alkanut | maps loosely to | arrived | Arrived | There is no status for an appointment being in process in FHIR. In FHIR this information is tracked with the status of the Encounter resource. | ||
| 7 | Toteutunut | maps loosely to | fullfilled | Fulfilled | There is no status for an appointment being in process in FHIR. In FHIR this information is tracked with the status of the Encounter resource. | ||
| 8 | Ehdotettu | narrower | proposed | Proposed | The code proposed can be used to highlight that none of the participants have finalized their acceptance, or that there is still uncertainty about the time. | ||
| is equivalent to | pending | Pending | The code pending is a more generic match to Ehdotettu. | ||||
| 9 | Saapumatta | is equal to | noshow | No Show | |||
| 10 | Ilmoittautunut | is equal to | checked-in | Checked In | |||
Group 2 Mapping from AppointmentStatus to https://koodistopalvelu.kanta.fi/codeserver/pages/classification-view-page.xhtml?classificationKey=1943
| Source Concept Details | Relationship | Target Concept Details | Comment | Properties | |||
| Codes from AppointmentStatus | Codes from https://koodistopalvelu.kanta.fi/codeserver/pages/classification-view-page.xhtml?classificationKey=1943 | ||||||
| proposed | Proposed | maps to wider concept | 8 | Ehdotettu | The Finnish logical model does not separate between proposed and pending codes | ||
| pending | Pending | maps to wider concept | 8 | Ehdotettu | The Finnish logical model does not separate between proposed and pending codes | ||
| booked | Booked | is equal to | 3 | Varattu | |||
| arrived | Arrived | maps to wider concept | 10 | Ilmoittautunut | The Finnish logical model does not separate between arrived and checked-in codes | ||
| fulfilled | Fulfilled | narrower | 7 | Toteutunut | Use Toteutunut when the service related to the Appointment has begun or is completed | ||
| cancelled | Cancelled | is equal to | 4 | Peruttu | |||
| noshow | No Show | is equal to | 9 | Saapumatta | |||
| entered-in-error | Entered in error | (not mapped) | |||||
| checked-in | Checked In | is equivalent to | 10 | Ilmoittautunut | The Finnish logical model does not separate between arrived and checked-in codes | ||
| waitlist | Waitlisted | narrower | 1 | Suunniteltu | Use Suunniteltu when no service provider has been identified | ||
| narrower | 2 | Tilattu | Use Tilattu when a service provider has been identified | ||||
IG © 2023+ HL7 Finland. Package hl7.fhir.fi.scheduling#0.2.0-cibuild based on FHIR 4.0.1. Generated 2024-09-01
Links: Table of Contents
| QA Report| Version History
| 
| Source
| Propose a change