Generated Narrative: DefinicionDeEstructura ConditionDiagnosticoLE Name Flags Card. Type Description & Constraints Condition DiagnosticoCl #xD; id S 1..1 id Id temporal necesario para identificar el recurso #xD; clinicalStatus 0..1 CodeableConcept Estado clinico del diagnostico, general (active | inactive) o detallado (recurrence | relapse | remission | resolved) Binding: ConditionClinicalStatusCodes (required) #xD; coding S 1..1 Coding Código definido por un sistema terminológico #xD; system S 1..1 uri Sistema terminológico, url/uri/uuid Required Pattern: http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-clinical #xD; code S 1..1 code Código definido en un sistema terminológico #xD; display S 0..1 string Representación visual definida por el sistema terminológico #xD; verificationStatus 0..1 CodeableConcept Estado de verificación del diagnóstico por parte del médico solicitante. Puede ser unconfirmed | provisional | differential | confirmed | refuted | entered-in-error Binding: ConditionVerificationStatus (required) #xD; coding S 1..1 Coding Código definido por un sistema terminológico #xD; system S 1..1 uri Sistema terminológico, url/uri/uuid Required Pattern: http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-ver-status #xD; code S 1..1 code Código definido en un sistema terminológico #xD; display S 0..1 string Representación visual definida por el sistema terminológico #xD; category S 1..1 CodeableConcept Categoría del diagnóstico de origen. Se refiere a un diagnostico identificado durante el encuentro médico o un problema de salud previamente hablado #xD; coding S 1..1 Coding Código definido por un sistema terminológico #xD; system S 1..1 uri Sistema terminológico, url/uri/uuid Required Pattern: http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-category #xD; code S 1..1 code Código definido en un sistema terminológico Required Pattern: encounter-diagnosis #xD; display S 0..1 string Representación visual definida por el sistema terminológico #xD; text 0..1 string Representación en texto plano del concepto #xD; severity S 0..1 CodeableConcept Severidad del diagnóstico, indicada por el médico solicitante Binding: Condition/DiagnosisSeverity (required) #xD; coding S 1..1 Coding Código definido por un sistema terminológico #xD; system S 0..1 uri Identidad del sistema terminológico, url/uri/uuid #xD; code S 1..1 code Código definido en un sistema terminológico #xD; display S 0..1 string Representación visual definida por el sistema terminológico #xD; code 1..1 CodeableConcept Código correspondiente al diagnóstico realizado por el médico solicitante Binding: TerminologiasDiag (required) #xD; coding S 1..* Coding Código definido por un sistema terminológico #xD; system S 1..1 uri Sistema terminológico, url/uri/uuid #xD; code S 1..1 code Código definido en un sistema terminológico #xD; display S 0..1 string Representación definida por el sistema terminológico #xD; text S 0..1 string Descripcion en texto libre correspondiente al diagnóstico realizado por el médico solicitante #xD; subject 1..1 Reference(Patient LE) Paciente que tiene este diagnóstico #xD; encounter 0..1 Reference(Encounter Iniciar LE) Encounter created as part of #xD; Documentation for this format
Condicion Diagnostico LE, recurso que se utiliza para indicar el diagnóstico
Detailed information about conditions, problems or diagnoses
A clinical condition, problem, diagnosis, or other event, situation, issue, or clinical concept that has risen to a level of concern.
Most systems will expect a clinicalStatus to be valued for problem-list-items that are managed over time, but might not need a clinicalStatus for point in time encounter-diagnosis.
Condition.clinicalStatus SHALL be present if verificationStatus is not entered-in-error and category is problem-list-item
clinicalStatus.exists() or verificationStatus.coding.where(system='http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-ver-status' and code = 'entered-in-error').exists() or category.select($this='problem-list-item').empty()
exists(f:clinicalStatus) or exists(f:verificationStatus/f:coding/f:code/@value='entered-in-error') or not(exists(category[@value='problem-list-item']))
If condition is abated, then clinicalStatus must be either inactive, resolved, or remission
abatement.empty() or clinicalStatus.coding.where(system='http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-clinical' and (code='resolved' or code='remission' or code='inactive')).exists()
not(exists(*[starts-with(local-name(.), 'abatement')])) or exists(f:clinicalStatus/f:coding[f:system/@value='http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-clinical' and f:code/@value=('resolved', 'remission', 'inactive')])
Condition.clinicalStatus SHALL NOT be present if verification Status is entered-in-error
verificationStatus.coding.where(system='http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-ver-status' and code='entered-in-error').empty() or clinicalStatus.empty()
not(exists(f:verificationStatus/f:coding[f:system/@value='http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-ver-status' and f:code/@value='entered-in-error'])) or not(exists(f:clinicalStatus))
If the resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT contain nested Resources
not(parent::f:contained and f:contained)
If the resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL be referred to from elsewhere in the resource or SHALL refer to the containing resource
contained.where((('#'+id in (%resource.descendants().reference | %resource.descendants().as(canonical) | %resource.descendants().as(uri) | %resource.descendants().as(url))) or descendants().where(reference = '#').exists() or descendants().where(as(canonical) = '#').exists() or descendants().where(as(canonical) = '#').exists()).not()).trace('unmatched', id).empty()
not(exists(for $id in f:contained/*/f:id/@value return $contained[not(parent::*/descendant::f:reference/@value=concat('#', $contained/*/id/@value) or descendant::f:reference[@value='#'])]))
If a resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT have a meta.versionId or a meta.lastUpdated
contained.meta.versionId.empty() and contained.meta.lastUpdated.empty()
not(exists(f:contained/*/f:meta/f:versionId)) and not(exists(f:contained/*/f:meta/f:lastUpdated))
If a resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT have a security label
When a resource has no narrative, only systems that fully understand the data can display the resource to a human safely. Including a human readable representation in the resource makes for a much more robust eco-system and cheaper handling of resources by intermediary systems. Some ecosystems restrict distribution of resources to only those systems that do fully understand the resources, and as a consequence implementers may believe that the narrative is superfluous. However experience shows that such eco-systems often open up to new participants over time.
A resource should have narrative for robust management
< 243796009 |Situation with explicit context| : 246090004 |Associated finding| = ( ( < 404684003 |Clinical finding| MINUS ( << 420134006 |Propensity to adverse reactions| OR << 473010000 |Hypersensitivity condition| OR << 79899007 |Drug interaction| OR << 69449002 |Drug action| OR << 441742003 |Evaluation finding| OR << 307824009 |Administrative status| OR << 385356007 |Tumor stage finding|)) OR < 272379006 |Event|)
Observation[classCode=OBS, moodCode=EVN, code=ASSERTION, value<Diagnosis]
Id temporal necesario para identificar el recurso
El Id que envíe desde la aplicación es temporal, el definitivo es creado por el servidor
The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation.
The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.
All FHIR elements must have a @value or children
hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())
A set of rules under which this content was created
A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.
Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.
This element is labeled as a modifier because the implicit rules may provide additional knowledge about the resource that modifies it's meaning or interpretation
The base language in which the resource is written.
Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).
Text summary of the resource, for human interpretation
A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.
Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded information is added later.
These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.
This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags In their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.
Additional content defined by implementations
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Must have either extensions or value[x], not both
exists(f:extension)!=exists(f:*[starts-with(local-name(.), "value")])
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that *cannot* be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the [definition of modifier extensions](http://hl7.org/fhir/R4/extensibility.html#modifierExtension).
Modifier extensions are expected to modify the meaning or interpretation of the resource that contains them
Business identifiers assigned to this condition by the performer or other systems which remain constant as the resource is updated and propagates from server to server.
This is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see [discussion](http://hl7.org/fhir/R4/resource.html#identifiers)). It is best practice for the identifier to only appear on a single resource instance, however business practices may occasionally dictate that multiple resource instances with the same identifier can exist - possibly even with different resource types. For example, multiple Patient and a Person resource instance might share the same social insurance number.
Allows identification of the condition as it is known by various participating systems and in a way that remains consistent across servers.
Estado clinico del diagnostico, general (active | inactive) o detallado (recurrence | relapse | remission | resolved)
El estatus en el cual se encuentra la condición de un Paciente
The data type is CodeableConcept because clinicalStatus has some clinical judgment involved, such that there might need to be more specificity than the required FHIR value set allows. For example, a SNOMED coding might allow for additional specificity.
This element is labeled as a modifier because the status contains codes that mark the condition as no longer active.
Observation ACT .inboundRelationship[typeCode=COMP].source[classCode=OBS, code="clinicalStatus", moodCode=EVN].value
Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Código definido por un sistema terminológico
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
fhir:CodeableConcept.coding rdfs:subPropertyOf dt:CD.coding
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
fhir:Coding.system rdfs:subPropertyOf dt:CDCoding.codeSystem
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
fhir:Coding.version rdfs:subPropertyOf dt:CDCoding.codeSystemVersion
Código definido en un sistema terminológico
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Need to refer to a particular code in the system.
fhir:Coding.code rdfs:subPropertyOf dt:CDCoding.code
Representación visual definida por el sistema terminológico
A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.
Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.
C*E.2 - but note this is not well followed
fhir:Coding.display rdfs:subPropertyOf dt:CDCoding.displayName
If this coding was chosen directly by the user
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
fhir:Coding.userSelected fhir:mapsTo dt:CDCoding.codingRationale. fhir:Coding.userSelected fhir:hasMap fhir:Coding.userSelected.map. fhir:Coding.userSelected.map a fhir:Map; fhir:target dt:CDCoding.codingRationale. fhir:Coding.userSelected\#true a [ fhir:source "true"; fhir:target dt:CDCoding.codingRationale\#O ]
Plain text representation of the concept
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
C*E.9. But note many systems use C*E.2 for this
fhir:CodeableConcept.text rdfs:subPropertyOf dt:CD.originalText
Estado de verificación del diagnóstico por parte del médico solicitante. Puede ser unconfirmed | provisional | differential | confirmed | refuted | entered-in-error
Estado de verificación de la condición o Diagnóstico
verificationStatus is not required. For example, when a patient has abdominal pain in the ED, there is not likely going to be a verification status. The data type is CodeableConcept because verificationStatus has some clinical judgment involved, such that there might need to be more specificity than the required FHIR value set allows. For example, a SNOMED coding might allow for additional specificity.
This element is labeled as a modifier because the status contains the code refuted and entered-in-error that mark the Condition as not currently valid.
Observation ACT .inboundRelationship[typeCode=COMP].source[classCode=OBS, code="verificationStatus", moodCode=EVN].value
Categoría del diagnóstico de origen. Se refiere a un diagnostico identificado durante el encuentro médico o un problema de salud previamente hablado
The categorization is often highly contextual and may appear poorly differentiated or not very useful in other contexts.
'problem' if from PRB-3. 'diagnosis' if from DG1 segment in PV1 message
Representación en texto plano del concepto
Severidad del diagnóstico, indicada por el médico solicitante
A subjective assessment of the severity of the condition as evaluated by the clinician.
Coding of the severity with a terminology is preferred, where possible.
Can be pre/post-coordinated into value. Or ./inboundRelationship[typeCode=SUBJ].source[classCode=OBS, moodCode=EVN, code="severity"].value
Identidad del sistema terminológico, url/uri/uuid
Código correspondiente al diagnóstico realizado por el médico solicitante
Identificación de la condición, el problema o el diagnóstico o registro del "problema ausente" o de los "problemas desconocidos".
Se agregan los códigos no conocido o no presente
0..1 to account for primarily narrative only resources.
code 246090004 |Associated finding| (< 404684003 |Clinical finding| MINUS << 420134006 |Propensity to adverse reactions| MINUS << 473010000 |Hypersensitivity condition| MINUS << 79899007 |Drug interaction| MINUS << 69449002 |Drug action| MINUS << 441742003 |Evaluation finding| MINUS << 307824009 |Administrative status| MINUS << 385356007 |Tumor stage finding|) OR < 413350009 |Finding with explicit context| OR < 272379006 |Event|
Representación definida por el sistema terminológico
Descripcion en texto libre correspondiente al diagnóstico realizado por el médico solicitante
The anatomical location where this condition manifests itself.
Only used if not implicit in code found in Condition.code. If the use case requires attributes from the BodySite resource (e.g. to identify and track separately) then use the standard extension [bodySite](http://hl7.org/fhir/R4/extension-bodysite.html). May be a summary code, or a reference to a very precise definition of the location, or both.
Codes describing anatomical locations. May include laterality.
< 442083009 |Anatomical or acquired body structure|
Paciente sobre al que corresponde la condición.
Group is typically used for veterinary or public health use cases.
Referencia al recurso del Paciente al cual se indica el diagnóstico o condición
A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.
Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient")
The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).
This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.
Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).
Logical reference, when literal reference is not known
An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.
When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.
This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
The Encounter during which this Condition was created or to which the creation of this record is tightly associated.
This will typically be the encounter the event occurred within, but some activities may be initiated prior to or after the official completion of an encounter but still be tied to the context of the encounter. This record indicates the encounter this particular record is associated with. In the case of a "new" diagnosis reflecting ongoing/revised information about the condition, this might be distinct from the first encounter in which the underlying condition was first "known".
.inboundRelationship[typeCode=COMP].source[classCode=ENC, moodCode=EVN]
Fecha para determinación Diagnóstica a definir entre fecha única o período
Fecha o rango de fechas en que se definió el diagnóstico o se determinó la condición
Age is generally used when the patient reports an age at which the Condition began to occur.
.effectiveTime.low or .inboundRelationship[typeCode=SUBJ].source[classCode=OBS, moodCode=EVN, code="age at onset"].value
The date or estimated date that the condition resolved or went into remission. This is called "abatement" because of the many overloaded connotations associated with "remission" or "resolution" - Conditions are never really resolved, but they can abate.
There is no explicit distinction between resolution and remission because in many cases the distinction is not clear. Age is generally used when the patient reports an age at which the Condition abated. If there is no abatement element, it is unknown whether the condition has resolved or entered remission; applications and users should generally assume that the condition is still valid. When abatementString exists, it implies the condition is abated.
.effectiveTime.high or .inboundRelationship[typeCode=SUBJ].source[classCode=OBS, moodCode=EVN, code="age at remission"].value or .inboundRelationship[typeCode=SUBJ]source[classCode=CONC, moodCode=EVN].status=completed
The recordedDate represents when this particular Condition record was created in the system, which is often a system-generated date.
Individual who recorded the record and takes responsibility for its content.
Individual who is making the condition statement.
Clinical stage or grade of a condition. May include formal severity assessments.
exists(f:summary) or exists(f:assessment)
./inboundRelationship[typeCode=SUBJ].source[classCode=OBS, moodCode=EVN, code="stage/grade"]
Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Modifier extensions are expected to modify the meaning or interpretation of the element that contains them
A simple summary of the stage such as "Stage 3". The determination of the stage is disease-specific.
Codes describing condition stages (e.g. Cancer stages).
Reference to a formal record of the evidence on which the staging assessment is based.
The kind of staging, such as pathological or clinical staging.
Codes describing the kind of condition staging (e.g. clinical or pathological).
./inboundRelationship[typeCode=SUBJ].source[classCode=OBS, moodCode=EVN, code="stage type"]
Supporting evidence / manifestations that are the basis of the Condition's verification status, such as evidence that confirmed or refuted the condition.
The evidence may be a simple list of coded symptoms/manifestations, or references to observations or formal assessments, or both.
.outboundRelationship[typeCode=SPRT].target[classCode=OBS, moodCode=EVN]
A manifestation or symptom that led to the recording of this condition.
Codes that describe the manifestation or symptoms of a condition.
Links to other relevant information, including pathology reports.
Additional information about the Condition
Additional information about the Condition. This is a general notes/comments entry for description of the Condition, its diagnosis and prognosis.
.inboundRelationship[typeCode=SUBJ].source[classCode=OBS, moodCode=EVN, code="annotation"].value