Profile Comparison between http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/StructureDefinition/Condition-uv-ips vs http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ipa/StructureDefinition/ipa-condition

Left:Condition (IPS) (http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/StructureDefinition/Condition-uv-ips)
Right:IPA-Condition (http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ipa/StructureDefinition/ipa-condition)

Messages

ErrorStructureDefinition.urlValues for url differ: 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/StructureDefinition/Condition-uv-ips' vs 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ipa/StructureDefinition/ipa-condition'
ErrorStructureDefinition.versionValues for version differ: '1.1.0' vs '1.0.0'
InformationStructureDefinition.nameValues for name differ: 'ConditionUvIps' vs 'IPACondition'
InformationStructureDefinition.titleValues for title differ: 'Condition (IPS)' vs 'IPA-Condition'
InformationStructureDefinition.dateValues for date differ: '2022-11-22T03:24:39+00:00' vs '2022-08-02'
InformationStructureDefinition.publisherValues for publisher differ: 'Health Level Seven International - Patient Care Work Group' vs 'HL7 International - Patient Care Work Group'
WarningConditionElements differ in short: 'Documentation of a health problem of the patient' vs 'Detailed information about conditions, problems or diagnoses'
WarningCondition.clinicalStatusElements differ in short: 'Concept - reference to a terminology or just text' vs 'active | recurrence | relapse | inactive | remission | resolved'
WarningCondition.clinicalStatusElements differ in definition: 'A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.' vs 'The clinical status of the condition.'
WarningCondition.clinicalStatusElements differ in comments: 'Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.' vs 'The data type is CodeableConcept because clinicalStatus has some clinical judgment involved, such that there might need to be more specificity than the required FHIR value set allows. For example, a SNOMED coding might allow for additional specificity.'
InformationCondition.clinicalStatusElement minimum cardinalities differ: '1' vs '0'
WarningCondition.verificationStatusElements differ in short: 'Concept - reference to a terminology or just text' vs 'unconfirmed | provisional | differential | confirmed | refuted | entered-in-error'
WarningCondition.verificationStatusElements differ in definition: 'A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.' vs 'The verification status to support the clinical status of the condition.'
WarningCondition.verificationStatusElements differ in comments: 'This element is labeled as a modifier because the status contains the code refuted and entered-in-error that mark the Condition as not currently valid.' vs 'verificationStatus is not required. For example, when a patient has abdominal pain in the ED, there is not likely going to be a verification status. The data type is CodeableConcept because verificationStatus has some clinical judgment involved, such that there might need to be more specificity than the required FHIR value set allows. For example, a SNOMED coding might allow for additional specificity.'
WarningCondition.verificationStatusElements differ in definition for mustSupport: 'false' vs 'true'
WarningCondition.categoryElements differ in short: 'Concept - reference to a terminology or just text' vs 'problem-list-item | encounter-diagnosis'
WarningCondition.categoryElements differ in definition: 'A category assigned to the condition. In this profile, a health problem of the patient, therefore a 'problem-list-item'. ' vs 'A category assigned to the condition.'
WarningCondition.categoryElements differ in comments: 'In this profile, Condition represents a health problem of the patient. Therefore one of the category value(s) must be problem-list-item.' vs 'The categorization is often highly contextual and may appear poorly differentiated or not very useful in other contexts.'
WarningCondition.severityElements differ in short: 'Concept - reference to a terminology or just text' vs 'Subjective severity of condition'
WarningCondition.severityElements differ in definition: 'A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.' vs 'A subjective assessment of the severity of the condition as evaluated by the clinician.'
WarningCondition.severityElements differ in comments: 'Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.' vs 'Coding of the severity with a terminology is preferred, where possible.'
WarningCondition.severityElements differ in definition for mustSupport: 'true' vs 'false'
WarningCondition.codeElements differ in short: 'Concept - reference to a terminology or just text' vs 'Identification of the condition, problem or diagnosis'
WarningCondition.codeElements differ in definition: 'Identification of the condition, problem or diagnosis or recording of 'problem absent' or of 'problems unknown'.' vs 'Identification of the condition, problem or diagnosis.'
InformationCondition.codeExample/preferred bindings differ at Condition.code using binding from ConditionUvIps
WarningCondition.codeElements differ in binding.description: 'Code for a clinical problem that is selected from SNOMED CT or a code for absent/unknown problem' vs 'Identification of the condition or diagnosis.'
WarningCondition.bodySiteElements differ in short: 'Concept - reference to a terminology or just text' vs 'Anatomical location, if relevant'
WarningCondition.bodySiteElements differ in definition: 'A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.' vs 'The anatomical location where this condition manifests itself.'
WarningCondition.bodySiteElements differ in comments: 'Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.' vs 'Only used if not implicit in code found in Condition.code. If the use case requires attributes from the BodySite resource (e.g. to identify and track separately) then use the standard extension [bodySite]. May be a summary code, or a reference to a very precise definition of the location, or both.'
WarningCondition.subject.referenceElements differ in definition for mustSupport: 'true' vs 'false'
InformationCondition.subject.referenceElement minimum cardinalities differ: '1' vs '0'
WarningCondition.onset[x]Elements differ in definition for mustSupport: 'true' vs 'false'

Metadata

NameValueComments
.abstractfalse
    .baseDefinitionhttp://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Condition
      .copyrightUsed by permission of HL7 International all rights reserved Creative Commons License
      • Added the item 'Used by permission of HL7 International all rights reserved Creative Commons License'
      .date2022-11-22T03:24:39+00:002022-08-02
      • Values Differ
      .descriptionThis profile represents the constraints applied to the Condition resource by the International Patient Summary (IPS) FHIR Implementation Guide. A record of a problem is represented in the patient summary as an instance of the Condition resource constrained by this profile.Minimum expectations for a Condition resource when accessed via an International Patient Access API. This profile communicates information about a patient's condition or diagnosis, such as recording primary and secondary diagnoses for encounters or justification for past medications. For the use of the condition resource to get a list of the patient's current problem list, use the [IPA-Problem-List-Item ](StructureDefinition-ipa-problem-list-item.html) profile instead. The difference between this profile and the IPA Problem List Item profile is that this profile does not specify or require a category.
      • Values Differ
      .experimentalfalse
      • Added the item 'false'
      .fhirVersion4.0.1
        .jurisdiction
          ..jurisdiction[0]http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49.htm#001
            .kindresource
              .nameConditionUvIpsIPACondition
              • Values Differ
              .publisherHealth Level Seven International - Patient Care Work GroupHL7 International - Patient Care Work Group
              • Values Differ
              .purposeRepresentation of a problem in the international patient summary
              • Removed the item 'Representation of a problem in the international patient summary'
              .statusactive
                .titleCondition (IPS)IPA-Condition
                • Values Differ
                .typeCondition
                  .urlhttp://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/StructureDefinition/Condition-uv-ipshttp://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ipa/StructureDefinition/ipa-condition
                  • Values Differ
                  .version1.1.01.0.0
                  • Values Differ

                  Structure

                  NameL FlagsL Card.L TypeL Description & ConstraintsR FlagsR Card.L TypeL Description & ConstraintsCommentsdoco
                  .. Condition C0..*ConditionDocumentation of a health problem of the patient
                  C0..*ConditionDetailed information about conditions, problems or diagnoses
                  • Elements differ in short: 'Documentation of a health problem of the patient' vs 'Detailed information about conditions, problems or diagnoses'
                  ... id Σ0..1idLogical id of this artifactΣ0..1idLogical id of this artifact
                    ... meta Σ0..1MetaMetadata about the resourceΣ0..1MetaMetadata about the resource
                      ... implicitRules ?!Σ0..1uriA set of rules under which this content was created?!Σ0..1uriA set of rules under which this content was created
                        ... text 0..1NarrativeText summary of the resource, for human interpretation0..1NarrativeText summary of the resource, for human interpretation
                          ... contained 0..*ResourceContained, inline Resources
                          0..*ResourceContained, inline Resources
                            ... extension 0..*ExtensionAdditional content defined by implementations
                            0..*ExtensionAdditional content defined by implementations
                              ... modifierExtension ?!0..*ExtensionExtensions that cannot be ignored
                              ?!0..*ExtensionExtensions that cannot be ignored
                                ... identifier Σ0..*IdentifierExternal Ids for this condition
                                Σ0..*IdentifierExternal Ids for this condition
                                  ... clinicalStatus S1..1??Concept - reference to a terminology or just text
                                  Binding: ?? (required): The clinical status of the condition or diagnosis.

                                  ?!SΣC0..1CodeableConceptactive | recurrence | relapse | inactive | remission | resolved
                                  Binding: ?? (required): The clinical status of the condition or diagnosis.

                                  • Elements differ in short: 'Concept - reference to a terminology or just text' vs 'active | recurrence | relapse | inactive | remission | resolved'
                                  • Elements differ in definition: 'A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.' vs 'The clinical status of the condition.'
                                  • Elements differ in comments: 'Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.' vs 'The data type is CodeableConcept because clinicalStatus has some clinical judgment involved, such that there might need to be more specificity than the required FHIR value set allows. For example, a SNOMED coding might allow for additional specificity.'
                                  • Element minimum cardinalities differ: '1' vs '0'
                                  ... verificationStatus 0..1??Concept - reference to a terminology or just text
                                  Binding: ?? (required): The verification status to support or decline the clinical status of the condition or diagnosis.

                                  ?!SΣC0..1CodeableConceptunconfirmed | provisional | differential | confirmed | refuted | entered-in-error
                                  Binding: ?? (required): The verification status to support or decline the clinical status of the condition or diagnosis.

                                  • Elements differ in short: 'Concept - reference to a terminology or just text' vs 'unconfirmed | provisional | differential | confirmed | refuted | entered-in-error'
                                  • Elements differ in definition: 'A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.' vs 'The verification status to support the clinical status of the condition.'
                                  • Elements differ in comments: 'This element is labeled as a modifier because the status contains the code refuted and entered-in-error that mark the Condition as not currently valid.' vs 'verificationStatus is not required. For example, when a patient has abdominal pain in the ED, there is not likely going to be a verification status. The data type is CodeableConcept because verificationStatus has some clinical judgment involved, such that there might need to be more specificity than the required FHIR value set allows. For example, a SNOMED coding might allow for additional specificity.'
                                  • Elements differ in definition for mustSupport: 'false' vs 'true'
                                  ... category S0..*??Concept - reference to a terminology or just text
                                  Binding: ?? (preferred)
                                  Additional BindingsPurpose
                                  ??candidate

                                  S0..*CodeableConceptproblem-list-item | encounter-diagnosis
                                  Binding: ?? (extensible): A category assigned to the condition.


                                  • Elements differ in short: 'Concept - reference to a terminology or just text' vs 'problem-list-item | encounter-diagnosis'
                                  • Elements differ in definition: 'A category assigned to the condition. In this profile, a health problem of the patient, therefore a 'problem-list-item'. ' vs 'A category assigned to the condition.'
                                  • Elements differ in comments: 'In this profile, Condition represents a health problem of the patient. Therefore one of the category value(s) must be problem-list-item.' vs 'The categorization is often highly contextual and may appear poorly differentiated or not very useful in other contexts.'
                                  ... severity S0..1??Concept - reference to a terminology or just text
                                  Binding: ?? (preferred)
                                  Additional BindingsPurpose
                                  ??candidate
                                  0..1CodeableConceptSubjective severity of condition
                                  Binding: ?? (preferred): A subjective assessment of the severity of the condition as evaluated by the clinician.

                                  • Elements differ in short: 'Concept - reference to a terminology or just text' vs 'Subjective severity of condition'
                                  • Elements differ in definition: 'A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.' vs 'A subjective assessment of the severity of the condition as evaluated by the clinician.'
                                  • Elements differ in comments: 'Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.' vs 'Coding of the severity with a terminology is preferred, where possible.'
                                  • Elements differ in definition for mustSupport: 'true' vs 'false'
                                  ... code S1..1??Concept - reference to a terminology or just text
                                  Binding: ?? (preferred): Code for a clinical problem that is selected from SNOMED CT or a code for absent/unknown problem

                                  Additional BindingsPurpose
                                  ??candidate
                                  ??candidate
                                  SΣ1..1CodeableConceptIdentification of the condition, problem or diagnosis
                                  Binding: ?? (example): Identification of the condition or diagnosis.

                                  • Elements differ in short: 'Concept - reference to a terminology or just text' vs 'Identification of the condition, problem or diagnosis'
                                  • Elements differ in definition: 'Identification of the condition, problem or diagnosis or recording of "problem absent" or of "problems unknown".' vs 'Identification of the condition, problem or diagnosis.'
                                  • Example/preferred bindings differ at Condition.code using binding from ConditionUvIps
                                  • Elements differ in binding.description: 'Code for a clinical problem that is selected from SNOMED CT or a code for absent/unknown problem' vs 'Identification of the condition or diagnosis.'
                                  ... bodySite 0..*??Concept - reference to a terminology or just text
                                  Binding: ?? (example)
                                  Σ0..*CodeableConceptAnatomical location, if relevant
                                  Binding: ?? (example): Codes describing anatomical locations. May include laterality.


                                  • Elements differ in short: 'Concept - reference to a terminology or just text' vs 'Anatomical location, if relevant'
                                  • Elements differ in definition: 'A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.' vs 'The anatomical location where this condition manifests itself.'
                                  • Elements differ in comments: 'Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.' vs 'Only used if not implicit in code found in Condition.code. If the use case requires attributes from the BodySite resource (e.g. to identify and track separately) then use the standard extension [bodySite]. May be a summary code, or a reference to a very precise definition of the location, or both.'
                                  ... subject SΣ1..1Reference(Patient (IPS))Who has the condition?SΣ1..1Reference(IPA-Patient)Who has the condition?
                                    .... id 0..1stringUnique id for inter-element referencing0..1stringUnique id for inter-element referencing
                                      .... Slices for extension 0..*ExtensionAdditional content defined by implementations
                                      Slice: Unordered, Open by value:url
                                      0..*ExtensionAdditional content defined by implementations
                                      Slice: Unordered, Open by value:url
                                        .... reference SΣC1..1stringLiteral reference, Relative, internal or absolute URLΣC0..1stringLiteral reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL
                                        • Elements differ in definition for mustSupport: 'true' vs 'false'
                                        • Element minimum cardinalities differ: '1' vs '0'
                                        .... type Σ0..1uriType the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient")
                                        Binding: ?? (extensible): Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).

                                        Σ0..1uriType the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient")
                                        Binding: ?? (extensible): Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).

                                          .... identifier Σ0..1IdentifierLogical reference, when literal reference is not knownΣ0..1IdentifierLogical reference, when literal reference is not known
                                            .... display Σ0..1stringText alternative for the resourceΣ0..1stringText alternative for the resource
                                              ... encounter Σ0..1Reference(Encounter)Encounter created as part ofΣ0..1Reference(Encounter)Encounter created as part of
                                                ... onset[x] SΣ0..1dateTime S, Age, Period, Range, stringEstimated or actual date, date-time, or ageΣ0..1dateTime, Age, Period, Range, stringEstimated or actual date, date-time, or age
                                                • Elements differ in definition for mustSupport: 'true' vs 'false'
                                                ... abatement[x] C0..1dateTime, Age, Period, Range, stringWhen in resolution/remissionC0..1dateTime, Age, Period, Range, stringWhen in resolution/remission
                                                  ... recordedDate Σ0..1dateTimeDate record was first recordedΣ0..1dateTimeDate record was first recorded
                                                    ... recorder Σ0..1Reference(Practitioner | PractitionerRole | Patient | RelatedPerson)Who recorded the conditionΣ0..1Reference(Practitioner | PractitionerRole | Patient | RelatedPerson)Who recorded the condition
                                                      ... asserter Σ0..1Reference(Practitioner | PractitionerRole | Patient | RelatedPerson)Person who asserts this conditionΣ0..1Reference(Practitioner | PractitionerRole | Patient | RelatedPerson)Person who asserts this condition
                                                        ... stage C0..*BackboneElementStage/grade, usually assessed formally
                                                        C0..*BackboneElementStage/grade, usually assessed formally
                                                          .... id 0..1stringUnique id for inter-element referencing0..1stringUnique id for inter-element referencing
                                                            .... extension 0..*ExtensionAdditional content defined by implementations
                                                            0..*ExtensionAdditional content defined by implementations
                                                              .... modifierExtension ?!Σ0..*ExtensionExtensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
                                                              ?!Σ0..*ExtensionExtensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
                                                                .... summary C0..1CodeableConceptSimple summary (disease specific)
                                                                Binding: ?? (example): Codes describing condition stages (e.g. Cancer stages).

                                                                C0..1CodeableConceptSimple summary (disease specific)
                                                                Binding: ?? (example): Codes describing condition stages (e.g. Cancer stages).

                                                                  .... assessment C0..*Reference(ClinicalImpression | DiagnosticReport | Observation)Formal record of assessment
                                                                  C0..*Reference(ClinicalImpression | DiagnosticReport | Observation)Formal record of assessment
                                                                    .... type 0..1CodeableConceptKind of staging
                                                                    Binding: ?? (example): Codes describing the kind of condition staging (e.g. clinical or pathological).

                                                                    0..1CodeableConceptKind of staging
                                                                    Binding: ?? (example): Codes describing the kind of condition staging (e.g. clinical or pathological).

                                                                      ... evidence C0..*BackboneElementSupporting evidence
                                                                      C0..*BackboneElementSupporting evidence
                                                                        .... id 0..1stringUnique id for inter-element referencing0..1stringUnique id for inter-element referencing
                                                                          .... extension 0..*ExtensionAdditional content defined by implementations
                                                                          0..*ExtensionAdditional content defined by implementations
                                                                            .... modifierExtension ?!Σ0..*ExtensionExtensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
                                                                            ?!Σ0..*ExtensionExtensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
                                                                              .... code ΣC0..*CodeableConceptManifestation/symptom
                                                                              Binding: ?? (example): Codes that describe the manifestation or symptoms of a condition.


                                                                              ΣC0..*CodeableConceptManifestation/symptom
                                                                              Binding: ?? (example): Codes that describe the manifestation or symptoms of a condition.


                                                                                .... detail ΣC0..*Reference(Resource)Supporting information found elsewhere
                                                                                ΣC0..*Reference(Resource)Supporting information found elsewhere
                                                                                  ... note 0..*AnnotationAdditional information about the Condition
                                                                                  0..*AnnotationAdditional information about the Condition

                                                                                    doco Documentation for this format