The current status of the Correction Request or Log Disagreement process. This status together with the business status can be used to determine the state of the process.

The reason for the correction request status. Codes to identify the reason for current status. These will typically be specific to a particular workflow.

The business status of the request for correction process or the log disagreement process. The domain-specific business-contextual sub-state of the task. For example: Waiting on additional information from requester, waiting on additional information from fulfiller (could be a specific party on the fulfiller side), more time needed to review request, an amendment will be made to the record, an amendment has been made to the record, current record determined accurate and will not be amended, a partial amendment will be made to the record, a partial amendment has been made to the record, disagreement has been reviewed and attached to the record, disagreement has been rebutted.

Either a patient correction or a disagreement.

The patient whose record this correction or disagreement references. If this task was created in response to a request received through a Communication resource, this value SHALL be populated with the value of Communication.subject from the original request.

The date/time that the original request was received by the Fulfiller, kicking off the request for correction or log disagreement process. If the request was received within the payload of a Communication resource, it SHOULD match Communication.sent from the original request Communication resource.

Indicates the most recent modification date/time for the correction process. Usually this will change in conjunction with a status or businessStatus change. When status = completed, this element gives the process completion date/time. Note that this element is useful when doing historical version searches.

The entity that is requesting the correction or logging the disagreement, such as a patient or their caregiver.

Used on Log Disagreement Task to point to the original Request for Correction Task.

Notes from Requestors SHOULD be placed into additional communications instead of notes, so that Fulfillers review them. This element SHALL NOT contain actionable requests from either Requestors or Fulfillers.

A task to be performed.

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

The business identifier for this task.

BasedOn refers to a higher-level authorization that triggered the creation of the task. It references a "request" resource such as a ServiceRequest, MedicationRequest, ServiceRequest, CarePlan, etc. which is distinct from the "request" resource the task is seeking to fulfill. This latter resource is referenced by FocusOn. For example, based on a ServiceRequest (= BasedOn), a task is created to fulfill a procedureRequest ( = FocusOn ) to collect a specimen from a patient.

Task that this particular task is part of.

This should usually be 0..1.

Allows tasks to be broken down into sub-steps (and this division can occur independent of the original task).

The current status of the task.

The current status of the Correction Request or Log Disagreement process. This status together with the business status can be used to determine the state of the process.

These states enable coordination of task status with off-the-shelf workflow solutions that support automation of tasks.

An explanation as to why this task is held, failed, was refused, etc.

The reason for the correction request status. Codes to identify the reason for current status. These will typically be specific to a particular workflow.

This applies to the current status. Look at the history of the task to see reasons for past statuses.

Codes to identify the reason for current status. These will typically be specific to a particular workflow.

Contains business-specific nuances of the business state.

The business status of the request for correction process or the log disagreement process. The domain-specific business-contextual sub-state of the task. For example: Waiting on additional information from requester, waiting on additional information from fulfiller (could be a specific party on the fulfiller side), more time needed to review request, an amendment will be made to the record, an amendment has been made to the record, current record determined accurate and will not be amended, a partial amendment will be made to the record, a partial amendment has been made to the record, disagreement has been reviewed and attached to the record, disagreement has been rebutted.

There's often a need to track substates of a task - this is often variable by specific workflow implementation.

Indicates the "level" of actionability associated with the Task, i.e. i+R[9]Cs this a proposed task, a planned task, an actionable task, etc.

This element is immutable. Proposed tasks, planned tasks, etc. must be distinct instances.

In most cases, Tasks will have an intent of "order".

Distinguishes whether the task is a proposal, plan or full order.

Either a patient correction or a disagreement.

A name or code (or both) briefly describing what the task involves.

The title (eg "My Tasks", "Outstanding Tasks for Patient X") should go into the code.

The entity who benefits from the performance of the service specified in the task (e.g., the patient).

The patient whose record this correction or disagreement references. If this task was created in response to a request received through a Communication resource, this value SHALL be populated with the value of Communication.subject from the original request.

Used to track tasks outstanding for a beneficiary. Do not use to track the task owner or creator (see owner and creator respectively). This can also affect access control.

The healthcare event (e.g. a patient and healthcare provider interaction) during which this task was created.

For some tasks it may be important to know the link between the encounter the task originated within.

Identifies the time action was first taken against the task (start) and/or the time final action was taken against the task prior to marking it as completed (end).

The date and time this task was created.

The date/time that the original request was received by the Fulfiller, kicking off the request for correction or log disagreement process. If the request was received within the payload of a Communication resource, it SHOULD match Communication.sent from the original request Communication resource.

Most often used along with lastUpdated to track duration of task to supporting monitoring and management.

The date and time of last modification to this task.

Indicates the most recent modification date/time for the correction process. Usually this will change in conjunction with a status or businessStatus change. When status = completed, this element gives the process completion date/time. Note that this element is useful when doing historical version searches.

Used along with history to track task activity and time in a particular task state. This enables monitoring and management.

The entity that is requesting the correction or logging the disagreement, such as a patient or their caregiver.

The creator of the task.

Identifies who created this task. May be used by access control mechanisms (e.g., to ensure that only the creator can cancel a task).

Individual organization or Device currently responsible for task execution.

Tasks may be created with an owner not yet identified.

Identifies who is expected to perform this task.

A description or code indicating why this task needs to be performed.

This should only be included if there is no focus or if it differs from the reason indicated on the focus.

Indicates why the task is needed. E.g. Suspended because patient admitted to hospital.

A resource reference indicating why this task needs to be performed.

Used on Log Disagreement Task to point to the original Request for Correction Task.

Tasks might be justified based on an Observation, a Condition, a past or planned procedure, etc. This should only be included if there is no focus or if it differs from the reason indicated on the focus. Use the CodeableConcept text element in Task.reasonCode if the data is free (uncoded) text.

Free-text information captured about the task as it progresses.

Notes from Requestors SHOULD be placed into additional communications instead of notes, so that Fulfillers review them. This element SHALL NOT contain actionable requests from either Requestors or Fulfillers.

If the Task.focus is a request resource and the task is seeking fulfillment (i.e. is asking for the request to be actioned), this element identifies any limitations on what parts of the referenced request should be actioned.

Sometimes when fulfillment is sought, you don't want full fulfillment.

Outputs produced by the Task.

Resources and data produced during the execution the task. This data is generated by the business logic of task execution, and is stored separately because it varies between workflows.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

An Extension

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

An Extension

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

The name of the Output parameter.

Outputs are named to enable task automation to bind data and pass it from one task to the next.

The value of the Output parameter as a basic type.

Task outputs can take any form.

A task to be performed.

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation.

The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.

The base language in which the resource is written.

Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).

A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded information is added later.

These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.

This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags In their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

The business identifier for this task.

The URL pointing to a FHIR-defined protocol, guideline, orderset or other definition that is adhered to in whole or in part by this Task.

Enables a formal definition of how he task is to be performed, enabling automation.

The URL pointing to an externally maintained protocol, guideline, orderset or other definition that is adhered to in whole or in part by this Task.

Enables a formal definition of how he task is to be performed (e.g. using BPMN, BPEL, XPDL or other formal notation to be associated with a task), enabling automation.

BasedOn refers to a higher-level authorization that triggered the creation of the task. It references a "request" resource such as a ServiceRequest, MedicationRequest, ServiceRequest, CarePlan, etc. which is distinct from the "request" resource the task is seeking to fulfill. This latter resource is referenced by FocusOn. For example, based on a ServiceRequest (= BasedOn), a task is created to fulfill a procedureRequest ( = FocusOn ) to collect a specimen from a patient.

An identifier that links together multiple tasks and other requests that were created in the same context.

Billing and/or reporting can be linked to whether multiple requests were created as a single unit.

Task that this particular task is part of.

This should usually be 0..1.

Allows tasks to be broken down into sub-steps (and this division can occur independent of the original task).

The current status of the task.

The current status of the Correction Request or Log Disagreement process. This status together with the business status can be used to determine the state of the process.

These states enable coordination of task status with off-the-shelf workflow solutions that support automation of tasks.

An explanation as to why this task is held, failed, was refused, etc.

The reason for the correction request status. Codes to identify the reason for current status. These will typically be specific to a particular workflow.

Codes to identify the reason for current status. These will typically be specific to a particular workflow.

Contains business-specific nuances of the business state.

The business status of the request for correction process or the log disagreement process. The domain-specific business-contextual sub-state of the task. For example: Waiting on additional information from requester, waiting on additional information from fulfiller (could be a specific party on the fulfiller side), more time needed to review request, an amendment will be made to the record, an amendment has been made to the record, current record determined accurate and will not be amended, a partial amendment will be made to the record, a partial amendment has been made to the record, disagreement has been reviewed and attached to the record, disagreement has been rebutted.

There's often a need to track substates of a task - this is often variable by specific workflow implementation.

Indicates the "level" of actionability associated with the Task, i.e. i+R[9]Cs this a proposed task, a planned task, an actionable task, etc.

This element is immutable. Proposed tasks, planned tasks, etc. must be distinct instances.

Indicates how quickly the Task should be addressed with respect to other requests.

Used to identify the service level expected while performing a task.

Either a patient correction or a disagreement.

The title (eg "My Tasks", "Outstanding Tasks for Patient X") should go into the code.

A free-text description of what is to be performed.

The request being actioned or the resource being manipulated by this task.

If multiple resources need to be manipulated, use sub-tasks. (This ensures that status can be tracked independently for each referenced resource.).

Used to identify the thing to be done.

The entity who benefits from the performance of the service specified in the task (e.g., the patient).

The patient whose record this correction or disagreement references. If this task was created in response to a request received through a Communication resource, this value SHALL be populated with the value of Communication.subject from the original request.

Used to track tasks outstanding for a beneficiary. Do not use to track the task owner or creator (see owner and creator respectively). This can also affect access control.

The healthcare event (e.g. a patient and healthcare provider interaction) during which this task was created.

For some tasks it may be important to know the link between the encounter the task originated within.

Identifies the time action was first taken against the task (start) and/or the time final action was taken against the task prior to marking it as completed (end).

The date and time this task was created.

The date/time that the original request was received by the Fulfiller, kicking off the request for correction or log disagreement process. If the request was received within the payload of a Communication resource, it SHOULD match Communication.sent from the original request Communication resource.

Most often used along with lastUpdated to track duration of task to supporting monitoring and management.

The date and time of last modification to this task.

Indicates the most recent modification date/time for the correction process. Usually this will change in conjunction with a status or businessStatus change. When status = completed, this element gives the process completion date/time. Note that this element is useful when doing historical version searches.

Used along with history to track task activity and time in a particular task state. This enables monitoring and management.

The entity that is requesting the correction or logging the disagreement, such as a patient or their caregiver.

Identifies who created this task. May be used by access control mechanisms (e.g., to ensure that only the creator can cancel a task).

The kind of participant that should perform the task.

Use to distinguish tasks on different activity queues.

Individual organization or Device currently responsible for task execution.

Tasks may be created with an owner not yet identified.

Identifies who is expected to perform this task.

Principal physical location where the this task is performed.

Ties the event to where the records are likely kept and provides context around the event occurrence (e.g. if it occurred inside or outside a dedicated healthcare setting).

A description or code indicating why this task needs to be performed.

This should only be included if there is no focus or if it differs from the reason indicated on the focus.

Indicates why the task is needed. E.g. Suspended because patient admitted to hospital.

A resource reference indicating why this task needs to be performed.

Used on Log Disagreement Task to point to the original Request for Correction Task.

Insurance plans, coverage extensions, pre-authorizations and/or pre-determinations that may be relevant to the Task.

Free-text information captured about the task as it progresses.

Notes from Requestors SHOULD be placed into additional communications instead of notes, so that Fulfillers review them. This element SHALL NOT contain actionable requests from either Requestors or Fulfillers.

Links to Provenance records for past versions of this Task that identify key state transitions or updates that are likely to be relevant to a user looking at the current version of the task.

This element does not point to the Provenance associated with the current version of the resource - as it would be created after this version existed. The Provenance for the current version can be retrieved with a _revinclude.

If the Task.focus is a request resource and the task is seeking fulfillment (i.e. is asking for the request to be actioned), this element identifies any limitations on what parts of the referenced request should be actioned.

Sometimes when fulfillment is sought, you don't want full fulfillment.

Additional information that may be needed in the execution of the task.

Resources and data used to perform the task. This data is used in the business logic of task execution, and is stored separately because it varies between workflows.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

An Extension

An Extension

A code or description indicating how the input is intended to be used as part of the task execution.

If referencing a BPMN workflow or Protocol, the "system" is the URL for the workflow definition and the code is the "name" of the required input.

Inputs are named to enable task automation to bind data and pass it from one task to the next.

The value of the input parameter as a basic type.

Outputs produced by the Task.

Resources and data produced during the execution the task. This data is generated by the business logic of task execution, and is stored separately because it varies between workflows.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

An Extension

An Extension

The name of the Output parameter.

Outputs are named to enable task automation to bind data and pass it from one task to the next.

The value of the Output parameter as a basic type.

Task outputs can take any form.