Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide
2.0.0-ballot - ballot
Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide
2.0.0-ballot - ballot
Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide, published by HL7 International / Clinical Decision Support. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 2.0.0-ballot built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/HL7/ebm/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions
{
"resourceType" : "Evidence",
"id" : "49328",
"meta" : {
"versionId" : "25",
"lastUpdated" : "2023-12-08T16:33:14.612Z",
"profile" : [
🔗 "http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ebm/StructureDefinition/comparative-evidence"🔗 ,
"http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ebm/StructureDefinition/evidence-synthesis-evidence"
]
},
"text" : {
"status" : "generated",
"div" : "<div xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><p class=\"res-header-id\"><b>Generated Narrative: Evidence 49328</b></p><a name=\"49328\"> </a><a name=\"hc49328\"> </a><a name=\"49328-en-US\"> </a><div style=\"display: inline-block; background-color: #d9e0e7; padding: 6px; margin: 4px; border: 1px solid #8da1b4; border-radius: 5px; line-height: 60%\"><p style=\"margin-bottom: 0px\">version: 25; Last updated: 2023-12-08 16:33:14+0000</p><p style=\"margin-bottom: 0px\">Profiles: <a href=\"StructureDefinition-comparative-evidence.html\">ComparativeEvidence</a>, <a href=\"StructureDefinition-evidence-synthesis-evidence.html\">EvidenceSynthesisEvidence</a></p></div><p><b>url</b>: <a href=\"https://fevir.net/resources/Evidence/49328\">https://fevir.net/resources/Evidence/49328</a></p><p><b>identifier</b>: FEvIR Object Identifier/49328</p><p><b>name</b>: AllCauseMortality2022metaAnalysis</p><p><b>title</b>: ComparativeEvidence: All-cause mortality effect of bariatric surgery in 2022 meta-analysis</p><p><b>status</b>: Active</p><p><b>date</b>: 2022-09-19 21:27:50+0000</p><p><b>publisher</b>: Computable Publishing LLC</p><p><b>contact</b>: <a href=\"mailto:support@computablepublishing.com\">support@computablepublishing.com</a></p><p><b>author</b>: Brian S. Alper: </p><h3>UseContexts</h3><table class=\"grid\"><tr><td style=\"display: none\">-</td><td><b>Code</b></td><td><b>Value[x]</b></td></tr><tr><td style=\"display: none\">*</td><td><a href=\"CodeSystem-179423.html#179423-evidence-communication\">Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System evidence-communication</a>: Evidence Communication</td><td><span title=\"Codes:{https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423 ComparativeEvidence}\">ComparativeEvidence</span></td></tr><tr><td style=\"display: none\">*</td><td><a href=\"CodeSystem-179423.html#179423-evidence-communication\">Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System evidence-communication</a>: Evidence Communication</td><td><span title=\"Codes:{https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423 EvidenceSynthesisEvidence}\">EvidenceSynthesisEvidence</span></td></tr><tr><td style=\"display: none\">*</td><td><a href=\"CodeSystem-179423.html#179423-evidence-communication\">Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System evidence-communication</a>: Evidence Communication</td><td><span title=\"Codes:{https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423 OutcomeMeasureEvidence}\">OutcomeMeasureEvidence</span></td></tr></table><p><b>copyright</b>: </p><div><p>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/</p>\n</div><blockquote><p><b>relatedArtifact</b></p><p><b>type</b>: Derived From</p><p><b>label</b>: data source</p><p><b>citation</b>: </p><div><p>Bariatric surgery and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Journal Article]. Contributors: van Veldhuisen SL, Gorter TM, van Woerden G, de Boer RA, Rienstra M, Hazebroek EJ, van Veldhuisen DJ. In: European heart journal, PMID 35243488. Published March 04, 2022. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35243488/.</p>\n</div><h3>Documents</h3><table class=\"grid\"><tr><td style=\"display: none\">-</td><td><b>Url</b></td></tr><tr><td style=\"display: none\">*</td><td><a href=\"https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/43/20/1955/6542137\">https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/43/20/1955/6542137</a></td></tr></table></blockquote><blockquote><p><b>relatedArtifact</b></p><p><b>type</b>: Supported With</p><p><b>classifier</b>: <span title=\"Codes:\">Citation Resource for the original article</span></p><p><b>display</b>: Citation Resource for 2022 Systematic Review of bariatric surgery mortality effect - PMID 35243488</p><p><b>resourceReference</b>: <a href=\"Citation-33400.html\">StudyCitation: 2022 Systematic Review of bariatric surgery mortality effect 35243488</a></p></blockquote><blockquote><p><b>relatedArtifact</b></p><p><b>type</b>: Cite As</p><p><b>citation</b>: </p><div><p>ComparativeEvidence: All-cause mortality effect of bariatric surgery in 2022 meta-analysis [Evidence]. Contributors: Brian S. Alper [Authors/Creators]. In: Fast Evidence Interoperability Resources (FEvIR) Platform, FOI 49328. Revised 2022-09-19. Available at: https://fevir.net/resources/Evidence/49328. Computable resource at: https://fevir.net/resources/Evidence/49328.</p>\n</div></blockquote><p><b>description</b>: </p><div><p>effect estimate for bariatric surgery on all-cause mortality pooled hazard ratio (HR) 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.62; P < 0.001 vs. controls) in meta-analysis of 21 cohort studies with 133,524 patients after bariatric surgery and 263,478 obese controls</p>\n</div><p><b>assertion</b>: </p><div><p>The present systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that bariatric surgery is associated with reduced all-cause and CV mortality.</p>\n</div><blockquote><p><b>variableDefinition</b></p><p><b>description</b>: </p><div><p>obese, adult (age ≥18 years old) patients <em>NOTE: note.text is used artificially to support the EBMonFHIR Implementation Guide and the following content would more properly be found in a note.text element:</em> Studies were considered eligible if they were designed to study outcomes in obese patients who underwent a weight-loss surgical intervention in comparison with an age, sex, and BMI matched control group who did not undergo a weight-loss surgical intervention. We searched for randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective longitudinal cohort studies, and case–control studies. For the control group, all non-surgical treatment options for obesity (e.g. intensive lifestyle intervention, standard of care, or no specific therapy) were accepted. Studies were excluded if (i) patients were not matched for age, sex, and BMI; (ii) the presence of one or more outcome parameters of interest (e.g. HF, AF, coronary artery disease) was required for inclusion; or (iii) if study groups were not representative in relation to the general population of patients with obesity (e.g. patients could only be included in the presence of a specific comorbidity, for instance, end-stage renal disease). The third criterium did not apply to Type 2 diabetes, thus studies that only included patients with Type 2 diabetes could be eligible for inclusion.</p>\n</div><p><b>variableRole</b>: Population</p><p><b>intended</b>: <a href=\"Group-171819.html\">StudyEligibilityCriteria: Obese patients ≥ 18 years old</a></p></blockquote><blockquote><p><b>variableDefinition</b></p><p><b>description</b>: </p><div><p>comparison groups of bariatric surgery vs. no bariatric surgery <em>NOTE: note.text is used artificially to support the EBMonFHIR Implementation Guide and the following content would more properly be found in a note.text element:</em> As the control group (observed reference exposure) was defined differently in each study, the intended reference exposure is described as the absence of the intended exposure (Bariatric Surgery).</p>\n</div><p><b>variableRole</b>: Exposure</p><p><b>comparatorCategory</b>: no bariatric surgery</p><p><b>intended</b>: <a href=\"EvidenceVariable-172427.html\">GroupAssignment: Bariatric Surgery vs. no bariatric surgery</a></p></blockquote><blockquote><p><b>variableDefinition</b></p><p><b>description</b>: </p><div><p>All-cause mortality <em>NOTE: note.text is used artificially to support the EBMonFHIR Implementation Guide and the following content would more properly be found in a note.text element:</em> The observed element can reference an EvidenceVariable Resource that defines the outcome measured through structured characteristics. For example, “Mean difference in HbA1c at 12 months” or “Mean difference in HbA1c at end of study”. The structured characteristics can be references to the Evidence instances for each of the included studies, in which case this is a direct link to the dataset used for analysis. The intended element can reference an EvidenceVariable Resource that expresses the outcome intended for evidence application through structured characteristics. The structured characteristics could be used to express the SR eligibility criteria for study outcomes (as a subset of eligibility criteria for studies).</p>\n</div><p><b>variableRole</b>: Outcome</p><p><b>observed</b>: We searched for randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective longitudinal cohort studies, and case–control studies. For the control group, all non-surgical treatment options for obesity (e.g. intensive lifestyle intervention, standard of care, or no specific therapy) were accepted. Studies were excluded if (i) patients were not matched for age, sex, and BMI; (ii) the presence of one or more outcome parameters of interest (e.g. HF, AF, coronary artery disease) was required for inclusion; or (iii) if study groups were not representative in relation to the general population of patients with obesity (e.g. patients could only be included in the presence of a specific comorbidity, for instance, end-stage renal disease). The third criterium did not apply to Type 2 diabetes, thus studies that only included patients with Type 2 diabetes could be eligible for inclusion.</p><p><b>intended</b>: <a href=\"EvidenceVariable-49217.html\">OutcomeVariable: All-cause mortality</a></p></blockquote><p><b>synthesisType</b>: <span title=\"Codes:{http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/synthesis-type std-MA}\">summary data meta-analysis</span></p><p><b>studyDesign</b>: <span title=\"Codes:{http://hl7.org/fhir/study-design SEVCO:01002}\">Observational research</span>, <span title=\"Codes:{http://hl7.org/fhir/study-design SEVCO:01011}\">Parallel cohort design</span>, <span title=\"Codes:{http://hl7.org/fhir/study-design SEVCO:01014}\">Matching for comparison</span></p><blockquote><p><b>statistic</b></p><p><b>description</b>: </p><div><p>pooled hazard ratio (HR) 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.62; P < 0.001 vs. controls) in meta-analysis of 21 cohort studies with 133,524 patients after bariatric surgery and 263,478 obese controls</p>\n</div><p><b>note</b>: heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0.06; Chi2 = 105.14; df = 23 (P < 0.00001); I2 = 78%, test for overall effect z = 9.41 (p < 0.00001)</p><p><b>statisticType</b>: <span title=\"Codes:{http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/statistic-type C93150}\">Hazard Ratio</span></p><p><b>quantity</b>: 0.55</p><h3>SampleSizes</h3><table class=\"grid\"><tr><td style=\"display: none\">-</td><td><b>Description</b></td><td><b>NumberOfStudies</b></td><td><b>NumberOfParticipants</b></td></tr><tr><td style=\"display: none\">*</td><td><div><p>21 cohort studies with 133,524 patients after bariatric surgery and 263,478 obese controls</p>\n</div></td><td>21</td><td>397002</td></tr></table><blockquote><p><b>attributeEstimate</b></p><p><b>description</b>: </p><div><p>95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.62</p>\n</div><p><b>type</b>: <span title=\"Codes:{http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/attribute-estimate-type C53324}\">Confidence interval</span></p><p><b>level</b>: 0.95</p><p><b>range</b>: 0.49-0.62</p></blockquote><blockquote><p><b>attributeEstimate</b></p><p><b>description</b>: </p><div><p>z = 9.41</p>\n</div><p><b>type</b>: <span title=\"Codes:{https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423 defined-in-text}\">Z-score</span></p><p><b>quantity</b>: 9.41</p></blockquote><blockquote><p><b>attributeEstimate</b></p><p><b>description</b>: </p><div><p>p < 0.00001</p>\n</div><p><b>type</b>: <span title=\"Codes:{http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/attribute-estimate-type C44185}\">P-value</span></p><p><b>quantity</b>: <1e-05</p></blockquote><blockquote><p><b>attributeEstimate</b></p><p><b>description</b>: </p><div><p>Tau squared = 0.06</p>\n</div><p><b>type</b>: <span title=\"Codes:{http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/attribute-estimate-type 0000421}\">Tau squared</span></p><p><b>quantity</b>: 0.06</p></blockquote><blockquote><p><b>attributeEstimate</b></p><p><b>description</b>: </p><div><p>Chi square for homogeneity 105.14, df 23 (p < 0.00001)</p>\n</div><p><b>type</b>: <span title=\"Codes:{https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423 defined-in-text}\">Chi square for homogeneity</span></p><p><b>quantity</b>: 105.14</p><h3>AttributeEstimates</h3><table class=\"grid\"><tr><td style=\"display: none\">-</td><td><b>Description</b></td><td><b>Type</b></td><td><b>Quantity</b></td></tr><tr><td style=\"display: none\">*</td><td><div><p>degrees of freedom (df) = 23</p>\n</div></td><td><span title=\"Codes:{https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423 defined-in-text}\">Degrees of Freedom</span></td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td style=\"display: none\">*</td><td><div><p>p < 0.00001</p>\n</div></td><td><span title=\"Codes:{http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/attribute-estimate-type C44185}\">P-value</span></td><td><1e-05</td></tr></table></blockquote><blockquote><p><b>attributeEstimate</b></p><p><b>description</b>: </p><div><p>I-squared = 78%</p>\n</div><p><b>type</b>: <span title=\"Codes:{http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/attribute-estimate-type 0000420}\">I-squared</span></p><p><b>quantity</b>: 78 %<span style=\"background: LightGoldenRodYellow\"> (Details: UCUM code% = '%')</span></p></blockquote><blockquote><p><b>modelCharacteristic</b></p><p><b>code</b>: <span title=\"Codes:{https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423 defined-in-text}\">Hazard ratios were log transformed, and the CI was converted to standard error = (upper limit − lower limit)/3.92 for 95% CI. In random effect models (DerSimonian and Laird), we analysed adjusted HR to generate pooled HRs for the association between bariatric surgery for outcome in comparison with controls. The pooled HRs were calculated using inverse-variance weighted averaging and were depicted in forest plots.</span></p></blockquote><blockquote><p><b>modelCharacteristic</b></p><p><b>code</b>: <span title=\"Codes:{http://hl7.org/fhir/statistic-model-code metaAnalysis}\">Meta-analysis</span></p></blockquote><blockquote><p><b>modelCharacteristic</b></p><p><b>code</b>: <span title=\"Codes:{http://hl7.org/fhir/statistic-model-code effectsRandom}\">Random-effects</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></div>"
},
"url" : "https://fevir.net/resources/Evidence/49328",
"identifier" : [
{
"type" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v2-0203",
"code" : "ACSN",
"display" : "Accession ID"
}
],
"text" : "FEvIR Object Identifier"
},
"system" : "https://fevir.net",
"value" : "49328",
"assigner" : {
"display" : "Computable Publishing LLC"
}
}
],
"name" : "AllCauseMortality2022metaAnalysis",
"title" : "ComparativeEvidence: All-cause mortality effect of bariatric surgery in 2022 meta-analysis",
"status" : "active",
"date" : "2022-09-19T21:27:50.801Z",
"publisher" : "Computable Publishing LLC",
"contact" : [
{
"telecom" : [
{
"system" : "email",
"value" : "support@computablepublishing.com"
}
]
}
],
"author" : [
{
"name" : "Brian S. Alper"
}
],
"useContext" : [
{
"code" : {
"system" : "https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423",
"code" : "evidence-communication",
"display" : "Evidence Communication"
},
"valueCodeableConcept" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423",
"code" : "ComparativeEvidence",
"display" : "ComparativeEvidence"
}
]
}
},
{
"code" : {
"system" : "https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423",
"code" : "evidence-communication",
"display" : "Evidence Communication"
},
"valueCodeableConcept" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423",
"code" : "EvidenceSynthesisEvidence",
"display" : "EvidenceSynthesisEvidence"
}
]
}
},
{
"code" : {
"system" : "https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423",
"code" : "evidence-communication",
"display" : "Evidence Communication"
},
"valueCodeableConcept" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423",
"code" : "OutcomeMeasureEvidence",
"display" : "OutcomeMeasureEvidence"
}
]
}
}
],
"copyright" : "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/",
"relatedArtifact" : [
{
"type" : "derived-from",
"label" : "data source",
"citation" : "Bariatric surgery and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Journal Article]. Contributors: van Veldhuisen SL, Gorter TM, van Woerden G, de Boer RA, Rienstra M, Hazebroek EJ, van Veldhuisen DJ. In: European heart journal, PMID 35243488. Published March 04, 2022. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35243488/.",
"document" : {
"url" : "https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/43/20/1955/6542137"
}
},
{
"type" : "supported-with",
"classifier" : [
{
"text" : "Citation Resource for the original article"
}
],
"display" : "Citation Resource for 2022 Systematic Review of bariatric surgery mortality effect - PMID 35243488",
"resourceReference" : {
🔗 "reference" : "Citation/33400",
"type" : "Citation",
"display" : "StudyCitation: 2022 Systematic Review of bariatric surgery mortality effect 35243488"
}
},
{
"type" : "cite-as",
"citation" : "ComparativeEvidence: All-cause mortality effect of bariatric surgery in 2022 meta-analysis [Evidence]. Contributors: Brian S. Alper [Authors/Creators]. In: Fast Evidence Interoperability Resources (FEvIR) Platform, FOI 49328. Revised 2022-09-19. Available at: https://fevir.net/resources/Evidence/49328. Computable resource at: https://fevir.net/resources/Evidence/49328."
}
],
"description" : "effect estimate for bariatric surgery on all-cause mortality pooled hazard ratio (HR) 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.62; P < 0.001 vs. controls) in meta-analysis of 21 cohort studies with 133,524 patients after bariatric surgery and 263,478 obese controls",
"assertion" : "The present systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that bariatric surgery is associated with reduced all-cause and CV mortality.",
"variableDefinition" : [
{
"description" : "obese, adult (age ≥18 years old) patients *NOTE: note.text is used artificially to support the EBMonFHIR Implementation Guide and the following content would more properly be found in a note.text element:* Studies were considered eligible if they were designed to study outcomes in obese patients who underwent a weight-loss surgical intervention in comparison with an age, sex, and BMI matched control group who did not undergo a weight-loss surgical intervention. We searched for randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective longitudinal cohort studies, and case–control studies. For the control group, all non-surgical treatment options for obesity (e.g. intensive lifestyle intervention, standard of care, or no specific therapy) were accepted. Studies were excluded if (i) patients were not matched for age, sex, and BMI; (ii) the presence of one or more outcome parameters of interest (e.g. HF, AF, coronary artery disease) was required for inclusion; or (iii) if study groups were not representative in relation to the general population of patients with obesity (e.g. patients could only be included in the presence of a specific comorbidity, for instance, end-stage renal disease). The third criterium did not apply to Type 2 diabetes, thus studies that only included patients with Type 2 diabetes could be eligible for inclusion.",
"variableRole" : "population",
"intended" : {
🔗 "reference" : "Group/171819",
"type" : "Group",
"display" : "StudyEligibilityCriteria: Obese patients ≥ 18 years old"
}
},
{
"description" : "comparison groups of bariatric surgery vs. no bariatric surgery *NOTE: note.text is used artificially to support the EBMonFHIR Implementation Guide and the following content would more properly be found in a note.text element:* As the control group (observed reference exposure) was defined differently in each study, the intended reference exposure is described as the absence of the intended exposure (Bariatric Surgery).",
"variableRole" : "exposure",
"comparatorCategory" : "no bariatric surgery",
"intended" : {
🔗 "reference" : "EvidenceVariable/172427",
"type" : "EvidenceVariable",
"display" : "GroupAssignment: Bariatric Surgery vs. no bariatric surgery"
}
},
{
"description" : "All-cause mortality *NOTE: note.text is used artificially to support the EBMonFHIR Implementation Guide and the following content would more properly be found in a note.text element:* The observed element can reference an EvidenceVariable Resource that defines the outcome measured through structured characteristics. For example, “Mean difference in HbA1c at 12 months” or “Mean difference in HbA1c at end of study”. The structured characteristics can be references to the Evidence instances for each of the included studies, in which case this is a direct link to the dataset used for analysis. The intended element can reference an EvidenceVariable Resource that expresses the outcome intended for evidence application through structured characteristics. The structured characteristics could be used to express the SR eligibility criteria for study outcomes (as a subset of eligibility criteria for studies).",
"variableRole" : "outcome",
"observed" : {
"display" : "We searched for randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective longitudinal cohort studies, and case–control studies. For the control group, all non-surgical treatment options for obesity (e.g. intensive lifestyle intervention, standard of care, or no specific therapy) were accepted. Studies were excluded if (i) patients were not matched for age, sex, and BMI; (ii) the presence of one or more outcome parameters of interest (e.g. HF, AF, coronary artery disease) was required for inclusion; or (iii) if study groups were not representative in relation to the general population of patients with obesity (e.g. patients could only be included in the presence of a specific comorbidity, for instance, end-stage renal disease). The third criterium did not apply to Type 2 diabetes, thus studies that only included patients with Type 2 diabetes could be eligible for inclusion."
},
"intended" : {
🔗 "reference" : "EvidenceVariable/49217",
"type" : "EvidenceVariable",
"display" : "OutcomeVariable: All-cause mortality"
}
}
],
"synthesisType" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/synthesis-type",
"version" : "3.1.0",
"code" : "std-MA",
"display" : "summary data meta-analysis"
}
]
},
"studyDesign" : [
{
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/study-design",
"version" : "5.0.0-cibuild",
"code" : "SEVCO:01002",
"display" : "Observational research"
}
]
},
{
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/study-design",
"version" : "5.0.0-cibuild",
"code" : "SEVCO:01011",
"display" : "Parallel cohort design"
}
]
},
{
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/study-design",
"version" : "5.0.0-cibuild",
"code" : "SEVCO:01014",
"display" : "Matching for comparison"
}
]
}
],
"statistic" : [
{
"description" : "pooled hazard ratio (HR) 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.62; P < 0.001 vs. controls) in meta-analysis of 21 cohort studies with 133,524 patients after bariatric surgery and 263,478 obese controls",
"note" : [
{
"text" : "heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0.06; Chi2 = 105.14; df = 23 (P < 0.00001); I2 = 78%"
},
{
"text" : "test for overall effect z = 9.41 (p < 0.00001)"
}
],
"statisticType" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/statistic-type",
"code" : "C93150",
"display" : "Hazard Ratio",
"userSelected" : true
}
]
},
"quantity" : {
"value" : 0.55
},
"sampleSize" : {
"description" : "21 cohort studies with 133,524 patients after bariatric surgery and 263,478 obese controls",
"numberOfStudies" : 21,
"numberOfParticipants" : 397002
},
"attributeEstimate" : [
{
"description" : "95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.62",
"type" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/attribute-estimate-type",
"code" : "C53324",
"display" : "Confidence interval"
}
]
},
"level" : 0.95,
"range" : {
"low" : {
"value" : 0.49
},
"high" : {
"value" : 0.62
}
}
},
{
"description" : "z = 9.41",
"type" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423",
"code" : "defined-in-text",
"display" : "Defined in text"
}
],
"text" : "Z-score"
},
"quantity" : {
"value" : 9.41
}
},
{
"description" : "p < 0.00001",
"type" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/attribute-estimate-type",
"code" : "C44185",
"display" : "P-value"
}
]
},
"quantity" : {
"value" : 0.00001,
"comparator" : "<"
}
},
{
"description" : "Tau squared = 0.06",
"type" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/attribute-estimate-type",
"code" : "0000421",
"display" : "Tau squared"
}
]
},
"quantity" : {
"value" : 0.06
}
},
{
"description" : "Chi square for homogeneity 105.14, df 23 (p < 0.00001)",
"type" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423",
"code" : "defined-in-text",
"display" : "Defined in text"
}
],
"text" : "Chi square for homogeneity"
},
"quantity" : {
"value" : 105.14
},
"attributeEstimate" : [
{
"description" : "degrees of freedom (df) = 23",
"type" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423",
"code" : "defined-in-text",
"display" : "Defined in text"
}
],
"text" : "Degrees of Freedom"
},
"quantity" : {
"value" : 23
}
},
{
"description" : "p < 0.00001",
"type" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/attribute-estimate-type",
"code" : "C44185",
"display" : "P-value"
}
]
},
"quantity" : {
"value" : 0.00001,
"comparator" : "<"
}
}
]
},
{
"description" : "I-squared = 78%",
"type" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/attribute-estimate-type",
"code" : "0000420",
"display" : "I-squared"
}
]
},
"quantity" : {
"value" : 78,
"unit" : "%",
"system" : "http://unitsofmeasure.org",
"code" : "%"
}
}
],
"modelCharacteristic" : [
{
"code" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "https://fevir.net/resources/CodeSystem/179423",
"code" : "defined-in-text",
"display" : "Defined in text"
}
],
"text" : "Hazard ratios were log transformed, and the CI was converted to standard error = (upper limit − lower limit)/3.92 for 95% CI. In random effect models (DerSimonian and Laird), we analysed adjusted HR to generate pooled HRs for the association between bariatric surgery for outcome in comparison with controls. The pooled HRs were calculated using inverse-variance weighted averaging and were depicted in forest plots."
}
},
{
"code" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/statistic-model-code",
"code" : "metaAnalysis",
"display" : "Meta-analysis"
}
]
}
},
{
"code" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/statistic-model-code",
"code" : "effectsRandom",
"display" : "Random-effects"
}
]
}
}
]
}
]
}
IG © 2024+ HL7 International / Clinical Decision Support. Package hl7.fhir.uv.ebm#2.0.0-ballot based on FHIR 6.0.0-ballot2. Generated 2024-11-21
Links: Table of Contents |
QA Report
| Version History |
|
Propose a change