Da Vinci Prior Authorization Support (PAS) FHIR IG, published by HL7 International / Financial Management. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 2.1.0 built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/HL7/davinci-pas/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions

Prior Authorization Implementation Guide Home Page

Official URL: http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-pas/ImplementationGuide/hl7.fhir.us.davinci-pas				Version: 2.1.0
IG Standards status: Trial-use			Maturity Level: 3	Computable Name: DaVinciPriorAuthorizationSupport

This specification is currently published as a Standard for Trial Use (STU). Feedback is welcome and may be submitted through the FHIR change tracker indicating "US Da Vinci PAS" as the specification.

Individuals interested in participating in the Prior Authorization Support or other HL7 Da Vinci projects can find information about Da Vinci here.

Note that this implementation guide is intended to support mapping between FHIR and X12 transactions. To respect X12 intellectual property, all mapping and X12-specific terminology information will be solely published by X12 and made available in accordance with X12 rules - which may require membership and/or payment. Please see this Da Vinci External Reference page for details on how to get this mapping.

There are many situationally required fields that are specified in the X12 TRN03 guide that do not have guidance in this Implementation Guide. All of these fields are marked as Must Support in this guide. However, due to licensing restrictions, implementers need to consult the X12 PAS guides to know the requirements for these fields.

Several of the profiles will require use of terminologies that are part of X12 which we anticipate being made publicly available. At such time as this occurs, the implementation guide will be updated to bind to these as external terminologies.

Overview

Prior authorization is a process commonly used by payer organizations to manage healthcare costs. However, the process of requesting and receiving prior authorizations can be slow and inefficient. The Administrative Simplification provisions of HIPAA mandate that the X12 278 Health Care Services Review Request for Review and Response be used for communicating prior authorization requests and responses. While few electronic health record (EHR) systems have implemented this interface, this functionality is often implemented as a portal solution and/or as a part of Practice Management and Revenue Cycle Management solutions. As a result, prior authorizations are often solicited by fax or by using payer-specific portals where clinicians re-key relevant information. Fax submission requires manual transcription on the payer side and may result in significant back-and-forth requesting additional information prior to a decision being made. Re-keying information is inefficient and can result in data entry errors.

This implementation guide strives to enable direct submission of prior authorization requests from EHR systems using a standard already widely supported by most EHRs - FHIR. To meet regulatory requirements, these FHIR interfaces will communicate with an intermediary who, when necessary, can convert the FHIR requests to the corresponding X12 instances prior to passing the requests to the payer. Responses are handled by a reverse mechanism (payer to intermediary as X12, then converted to FHIR and passed to the EHR). Direct submission of prior authorization requests from the EHR will reduce costs for both providers and payers. It will also result in faster prior authorization decisions which will lead to improved patient care and experience.

When combined with the Da Vinci Coverage Requirements Discovery (CRD) and Documentation Templates and Rules (DTR) implementation guides, direct submission of prior authorization requests will further increase efficiency by ensuring that authorizations are always sent when (and only when) necessary, and that such requests will almost always contain all relevant information needed to make the authorization decision on initial submission.

The implementation guide also defines capabilities around the management of prior authorization requests, including checking the status of a previously submitted request, updating a previously submitted request, and canceling a request.

A high-level summary of how all of these IGs will work together can be seen below:

CMS Exception

When using PAS under the CMS granted exception (Request Number: HL7 FHIR Exception #2021031001), the implementer(s) SHALL disregard any requirements in this Implementation Guide to translate the PAS FHIR Bundle into or out of the X12 278. The defined PAS FHIR request bundles SHALL be transmitted intact between the provider and payer. The PAS FHIR response bundles SHALL be transmitted intact between the payer and the provider. NOTE: This CMS exception has ended as of June 2024.

CMS Enforcement Discretion

The Office of Burden Reduction and Health Informatics (OBRHI) National Standards Group (NSG) announced an enforcement discretion that they would not enforce the requirement to use the X12 278 for prior authorization if the covered entities were using the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) based Prior Authorization API as described in the CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization final rule (CMS-0057-F). This allows the payer to return a prior authorization number for use in the X12 837 in coverage extension of the CRD and DTR IGs or as part of the all FHIR exchange of the Prior Authorization Response Bundle in the PAS IG.

When covered entities are operating under the enforcement discretion, the trading partners SHALL disregard any requirements in this Implementation Guide to translate the PAS FHIR Bundle into or out of the X12 278. The defined PAS FHIR request bundles SHALL be transmitted intact between the provider and payer. The PAS FHIR response bundles SHALL be transmitted intact between the payer and the provider.

Content and organization

The implementation guide is organized into the following sections:

• Use Cases and Overview describes the intent of the implementation guide, gives examples of its use and provides a high-level overview of expected process flow
• Technical Background describes the different specifications this implementation guide relies on and indicates what developers should read and understand prior to implementing this specification
• HIPAA Regulations explains the relevant portions of the regulatory context in which this implementation guide operates
• Formal Specification covers the detailed implementation requirements and conformance expectations
• ePA Coordinator covers the workflow regarding the exchanges between a Provider ePA Coordinator, multiple Provider HIT systems and the payer
• Metrics describes a set of metrics that can be collected to evaluate the adoption of PAS
• Artifacts introduces and provides links to the FHIR R4 profiles, operations and other FHIR artifacts used in this implementation guide
• Downloads allows download of this and other specifications as well as other useful files
• Credits identifies the individuals and organizations involved in developing this implementation guide

Dependencies

In addition, this guide uses content from the following FHIR-related specifications and implementation guides:

• Subscriptions R5 Backport
• Da Vinci CRD

This implementation guide defines additional constraints and usage expectations above and beyond the information found in these base specifications.

Next Page - Use Cases