Unable to compare with previous version: Unable to find version history at http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/aitransparency (Problem #1 with package-list.json at http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/aitransparency: Not Found)
IPA Comparison:
n/a
IPS Comparison:
n/a
Validation Flags:
On: autoLoad; Off: hintAboutNonMustSupport, anyExtensionsAllowed, checkAggregation, showReferenceMessages, noExperimentalContent, displayWarnings
There is no jira specification file defined with the expected name of FHIR-aitransparency in the xml folder of the https://github.com/HL7/Jira-Spec-Artifacts project. This must exist before ballot or publication.
Most code systems defined in HL7 IGs will need to move to THO later during the process. Consider giving this code system a THO URL now (See https://confluence.hl7.org/display/TSMG/Terminology+Play+Book, and/or talk to TSMG)CODESYSTEM_THO_CHECK
CodeSystem.concept[0] (l1/c2155)
warning
HL7 Defined CodeSystems should ensure that every concept has a definitionCODESYSTEM_CONCEPT_NO_DEFINITION
Most code systems defined in HL7 IGs will need to move to THO later during the process. Consider giving this code system a THO URL now (See https://confluence.hl7.org/display/TSMG/Terminology+Play+Book, and/or talk to TSMG)CODESYSTEM_THO_CHECK
CodeSystem.concept[0] (l1/c2412)
warning
HL7 Defined CodeSystems should ensure that every concept has a definitionCODESYSTEM_CONCEPT_NO_DEFINITION
No definition could be found for URL value 'https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/tree/main/tests/fixtures/cards'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
DocumentReference.type (l30/c4)
information
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/aitransparency/CodeSystem/AImodelCardCS#AIModelCard)Terminology_TX_NoValid_3_CC
ImplementationGuide/hl7.fhir.uv.aitransparency: ImplementationGuide: Validated against fhir.ImplementationGuide
Path
Severity
Message
ImplementationGuide (l1/c28569)
error
HL7 Implementation Guides must state their status explicitly using the extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-standards-statusIG_HL7_STANDARDS_STATUS_REQUIRED
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://example.org/codes/foobar' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {score} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit SHOULD contain the annotationTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NO_UNIT
Observation.referenceRange[0].high (l31/c8)
warning
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {score} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit SHOULD contain the annotationTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NO_UNIT
Observation.referenceRange[1].low (l41/c8)
warning
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {score} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit SHOULD contain the annotationTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NO_UNIT
Observation.referenceRange[1].high (l46/c8)
warning
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {score} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit SHOULD contain the annotationTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NO_UNIT
Observation.referenceRange[2].low (l56/c8)
warning
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {score} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit SHOULD contain the annotationTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NO_UNIT
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://example.org/codes' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ordinalValue|5.2.0 is deprecated with the note: 'Replaced by [[[http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/itemWeight]]]'MSG_DEPENDS_ON_DEPRECATED_NOTE
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-PurposeOfUse'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.1.0', found versions: 2.0.0, 3.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-PurposeOfUse' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-PurposeOfUse|3.1.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ObservationValue'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '4.0.0', found versions: 2.1.0, 4.0.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ObservationValue' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ObservationValue|4.0.0'
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'http://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/StructureDefinition/us-core-patient'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
Patient.extension[0] (l10/c5)
error
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/StructureDefinition/us-core-race could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
The definition for the Code System with URI 'urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.6.238' doesn't provide any codes so the code cannot be validatedTERMINOLOGY_TX_SYSTEM_NOT_USABLE
Patient.extension[0].url (l11/c75)
error
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/StructureDefinition/us-core-race'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
Patient.meta.profile[0] (l1/c2)
warning
Profile reference 'http://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/StructureDefinition/us-core-patient' has not been checked because it could not be found, and the validator is set to not fetch unknown profilesVALIDATION_VAL_PROFILE_UNKNOWN_NOT_POLICY
See https://github.com/FHIR/sample-ig/blob/master/input/ignoreWarnings.txt for examples
%There is no jira specification file defined with the expected name of FHIR-aitof in the xml folder of the https://github.com/HL7/Jira-Spec-Artifacts project. This must exist before ballot or publication.% (0 uses)
%This IG is version 6.0.0-ballot2, while the IG 'hl7.terminology.r5' is from version 5.0.0% (0 uses)
Most code systems defined in HL7 IGs will need to move to THO later during the process. Consider giving this code system a THO URL now (See https://confluence.hl7.org/display/TSMG/Terminology+Play+Book, and/or talk to TSMG)
Most code systems defined in HL7 IGs will need to move to THO later during the process. Consider giving this code system a THO URL now (See https://confluence.hl7.org/display/TSMG/Terminology+Play+Book, and/or talk to TSMG)
HL7 Implementation Guides must state their status explicitly using the extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-standards-status
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ordinalValue|5.2.0 is deprecated with the note: 'Replaced by [[[http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/itemWeight]]]'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-PurposeOfUse'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.1.0', found versions: 2.0.0, 3.1.0. Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-PurposeOfUse' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-PurposeOfUse|3.1.0'
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {score} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit SHOULD contain the annotation
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {score} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit SHOULD contain the annotation
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {score} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit SHOULD contain the annotation
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {score} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit SHOULD contain the annotation
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {score} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit SHOULD contain the annotation
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'LOINC Diagnostic Report Codes' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/report-codes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#104177005)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/aitransparency/CodeSystem/AImodelCardCS#AIInputPrompt)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/aitransparency/CodeSystem/AImodelCardCS#AIInputPrompt)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/aitransparency/CodeSystem/AImodelCardCS#AIModelCard)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/aitransparency/CodeSystem/AImodelCardCS#AIInputPrompt)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/aitransparency/CodeSystem/AImodelCardCS#AIInputPrompt)
Profile reference 'http://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/StructureDefinition/us-core-patient' has not been checked because it could not be found, and the validator is set to not fetch unknown profiles
hl7.fhir.uv.aitransparency
