HL7 Terminology (THO)
3.1.5 - Continuous Process Integration (ci build) World

HL7 Terminology (THO), published by HL7 International - Vocabulary Work Group. This is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 3.1.5). This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/HL7/UTG/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions

: ActMoodRequest - XML Representation

Active as of 2014-03-26

Raw xml | Download



<ValueSet xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
  <id value="v3-ActMoodRequest"/>
  <language value="en"/>
  <text>
    <status value="generated"/>
    <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"><ul><li>Include codes from <a href="CodeSystem-v3-ActMood.html"><code>http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActMood</code></a> where concept  is-a  <a href="CodeSystem-v3-ActMood.html#v3-ActMood-RQO">RQO</a></li></ul></div>
  </text>
  <url value="http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActMoodRequest"/>
  <identifier>
    <system value="urn:ietf:rfc:3986"/>
    <value value="urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.19947"/>
  </identifier>
  <version value="2.0.0"/>
  <name value="ActMoodRequest"/>
  <title value="ActMoodRequest"/>
  <status value="active"/>
  <date value="2014-03-26"/>
  <description
               value="A request or order for a service is an intent directed from a placer (request author) to a fulfiller (service performer).

*Rationale:* The concepts of a &quot;request&quot; and an &quot;order&quot; are viewed as different, because there is an implication of a mandate associated with order. In practice, however, this distinction has no general functional value in the inter-operation of health care computing. &quot;Orders&quot; are commonly refused for a variety of clinical and business reasons, and the notion of a &quot;request&quot; obligates the recipient (the fulfiller) to respond to the sender (the author). Indeed, in many regions, including Australia and Europe, the common term used is &quot;request.&quot;

Thus, the concept embodies both notions, as there is no useful distinction to be made. If a mandate is to be associated with a request, this will be embodied in the &quot;local&quot; business rules applied to the transactions. Should HL7 desire to provide a distinction between these in the future, the individual concepts could be added as specializations of this concept.

The critical distinction here, is the difference between this concept and an &quot;intent&quot;, of which it is a specialization. An intent involves decisions by a single party, the author. A request, however, involves decisions by two parties, the author and the fulfiller, with an obligation on the part of the fulfiller to respond to the request indicating that the fulfiller will indeed fulfill the request."/>
  <immutable value="true"/>
  <compose>
    <include>
      <system value="http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActMood"/>
      <filter>
        <property value="concept"/>
        <op value="is-a"/>
        <value value="RQO"/>
      </filter>
    </include>
  </compose>
</ValueSet>