Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) on EBMonFHIR
1.0.2 - ci-build

Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) on EBMonFHIR, published by Universitätsmedizin Greifswald. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 1.0.2 built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/CEOsys/cpg-on-ebm-on-fhir/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions

: Guideline Stage Classification - XML Representation

Active as of 2022-09-06

Raw xml | Download


<CodeSystem xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
  <id value="cs-guideline-stage-classification"/>
  <meta>
    <profile
             value="http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/cpg/StructureDefinition/cpg-shareablecodesystem"/>
  </meta>
  <text>
    <status value="generated"/>
    <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p class="res-header-id"><b>Generated Narrative: CodeSystem cs-guideline-stage-classification</b></p><a name="cs-guideline-stage-classification"> </a><a name="hccs-guideline-stage-classification"> </a><a name="cs-guideline-stage-classification-en-US"> </a><p>This  code system <code>https://www.netzwerk-universitaetsmedizin.de/fhir/cpg-on-ebm-on-fhir/CodeSystem/cs-guideline-stage-classification</code> defines the following codes:</p><table class="codes"><tr><td style="white-space:nowrap"><b>Code</b></td><td><b>Display</b></td><td><b>Definition</b></td></tr><tr><td style="white-space:nowrap">S3<a name="cs-guideline-stage-classification-S3"> </a></td><td>Evidence- and consensus-based guideline</td><td>Representative panel, Systematic search, selection, evaluation of literature, Structured consensus building.</td></tr><tr><td style="white-space:nowrap">S2e<a name="cs-guideline-stage-classification-S2e"> </a></td><td>Evidence-based Guideline</td><td>Systematic search, selection, evaluation of literature</td></tr><tr><td style="white-space:nowrap">S2k<a name="cs-guideline-stage-classification-S2k"> </a></td><td>Consensus-based Guideline</td><td>Representative body, structured consensus building</td></tr><tr><td style="white-space:nowrap">S1<a name="cs-guideline-stage-classification-S1"> </a></td><td>Action recommendations from expert groups</td><td>Consensus building in an informal process</td></tr></table></div>
  </text>
  <extension
             url="http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/cpg/StructureDefinition/cpg-knowledgeCapability">
    <valueCode value="shareable"/>
  </extension>
  <extension
             url="http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/cpg/StructureDefinition/cpg-knowledgeCapability">
    <valueCode value="computable"/>
  </extension>
  <extension
             url="http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/cpg/StructureDefinition/cpg-knowledgeCapability">
    <valueCode value="publishable"/>
  </extension>
  <extension
             url="http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/cpg/StructureDefinition/cpg-knowledgeRepresentationLevel">
    <valueCode value="structured"/>
  </extension>
  <url
       value="https://www.netzwerk-universitaetsmedizin.de/fhir/cpg-on-ebm-on-fhir/CodeSystem/cs-guideline-stage-classification"/>
  <version value="0.1.1"/>
  <name value="GuidelineStageClassification"/>
  <title value="Guideline Stage Classification"/>
  <status value="active"/>
  <date value="2022-09-06"/>
  <publisher
             value="Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) e.V"/>
  <contact>
    <telecom>
      <system value="url"/>
      <value value="https://www.netzwerk-universitaetsmedizin.de"/>
    </telecom>
  </contact>
  <description
               value="As part of the project planning for the creation or updating of a guideline,
    a decision should be made at an early stage about the planned level classification (&quot;S classification&quot;) according to the AWMF's system of rules (1-3).
    The S-classification scheme of the AWMF differentiates between the classes S1 treatment recommendation as well as S2e, S2k and S3 guideline.
    The &quot;S&quot; stands for the extent of the applied systematic approach in the development process of a guideline.
    Each class thus stands for a specific methodological concept that must be presented in a way that is comprehensible to the users.
    The choice of class is based on the question of how much effort is appropriate and feasible.
    The need for legitimacy for the implementation of the guideline (convincing the target group) must be taken into account.
    When choosing a higher S-classification in the context of updating a guideline, the adaptation to the corresponding methodology has to be considered."/>
  <content value="complete"/>
  <count value="4"/>
  <concept>
    <code value="S3"/>
    <display value="Evidence- and consensus-based guideline"/>
    <definition
                value="Representative panel, Systematic search, selection, evaluation of literature, Structured consensus building."/>
  </concept>
  <concept>
    <code value="S2e"/>
    <display value="Evidence-based Guideline"/>
    <definition
                value="Systematic search, selection, evaluation of literature"/>
  </concept>
  <concept>
    <code value="S2k"/>
    <display value="Consensus-based Guideline"/>
    <definition value="Representative body, structured consensus building"/>
  </concept>
  <concept>
    <code value="S1"/>
    <display value="Action recommendations from expert groups"/>
    <definition value="Consensus building in an informal process"/>
  </concept>
</CodeSystem>