Evidencevariable-example-group-assignment

FHIR CI-Build

This is the Continuous Integration Build of FHIR (will be incorrect/inconsistent at times).
See the Directory of published versions

Example EvidenceVariable/example-group-assignment (Narrative)

Clinical Decision Support Work Group

Maturity Level: N/A

Standards Status: Informative

Compartments: No defined compartments

This is the narrative for the resource. See also the XML, JSON or Turtle format. This example conforms to the profile EvidenceVariable.

Generated Narrative: EvidenceVariable example-group-assignment

version: 1; Last updated: 2024-12-17T19:40:19.291Z

Profile: http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ebm/StructureDefinition/group-assignment

StructureDefinition Work Group: cds

url: https://fevir.net/resources/EvidenceVariable/297490

identifier: FEvIR Object Identifier/https://fevir.net/FOI/297490

title: GroupAssignment: Jumping from aircraft with parachute vs. Jumping from aircraft with empty backpack

status: active

author: Joanne Dehnbostel:

publisher: HL7 International / Clinical Decision Support

contact: http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/dss

description:

This EvidenceVariable Resource (GroupAssignment Profile) describes a 2-group study (so handling='dichotomous') and lists the 2 study arms in category.name elements. Because the definition of this EvidenceVariable Resource is fully expressed in the handling and category elements, the defintion.concept element uses a CodeableConcept for 'Defined in handling and category elements'.

UseContexts

Code

Value[x]

179423 evidence-communication: Evidence Communication

GroupAssignment

copyright:

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Definitions

Concept

Defined in handling and category elements

handling: dichotomous

category
name: Jumping from aircraft with parachute
value: Jumping from aircraft with parachute

category
name: Jumping from aircraft with empty backpack
value: Jumping from aircraft with empty backpack

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.