Release 5 Draft Ballot

This is the Continuous Integration Build of FHIR (will be incorrect/inconsistent at times).
See the Directory of published versions

Pcd-example-notLabs.xml

Financial Management Work GroupMaturity Level: N/AStandards Status: InformativeCompartments: Not linked to any defined compartments

Raw XML (canonical form + also see XML Format Specification)

Jump past Narrative

ConsentDirective Example (id = "pcd-example-notLabs")

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<Contract xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
  <id value="pcd-example-notLabs"/> 

  <text> 
    <status value="generated"/> 
    <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The following scenario is based on existing
      jurisdictional policy and are realized in existing systems in Canada. The default
       policy is
      one of implied consent for the provision of care, so these scenarios all deal with
       withdrawal
      or withholding consent for that purpose. In other jurisdictions, where an express
       consent
      model is used (Opt-In), these would examples would contain the phrase &quot;consent
       to&quot; rather than
      &quot;withhold&quot; or &quot;withdraw&quot; consent for. <p>  specific to use-case 1. Withhold or withdraw consent
        for disclosure of records related to specific domain (e.g. DI, LAB, etc.) </p> <p>  Patient
        &quot;P. van de Heuvel&quot; wishes to withhold disclosure of all of her lab orders
         and results to any
        provider. </p> 
    </div> 
  </text> 

  <issued value="2014-08-17"/> 
  <!--   not bound by a timeframe - Contract.applies   -->

  <subject> 
    <reference value="Patient/f001"/> 
    <display value="P. van de Heuvel"/> 
  </subject> 

  <authority> 
    <reference value="Organization/3"/> 
    <display value="Michigan Health"/> 
  </authority> 

  <!--   and/or would this [also] go into Contract.domain as a Jurisdiction?? (see the example
   on UK Pharamacy Juristiction)   -->
  <domain> 
    <reference value="Location/ukp"/> 
    <display value="UK Pharmacies"/> 
  </domain> 

  <type> 
    <coding> 
      <system value="http://loinc.org"/> 
      <code value="57016-8"/> 
    </coding> 
  </type> 

  <!--   made up code-system to represent the set of privacy consent sub-types known and published
   by Canada Infoway   -->
  <subType> 
    <coding> 
      <system value="http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca.org/Consent-subtype-codes"/> 
      <code value="Opt-In"/> 
      <display value="Default Authorization with exceptions."/> 
    </coding> 
  </subType> 

  <!--   I can easily say to exclude a type of FHIR Resource, but lab-orders is not a direct
   Resource type. Might we put in FHIR based query parameters?   -->
  <term> 
    <offer> 
      <text value="sample"/> 
    </offer> 
    <group> 
      <type> 
        <coding> 
          <!--   made up code system   -->
          <system value="http://example.org/fhir/consent-term-type-codes"/> 
          <code value="withhold-object-type"/> 
        </coding> 
      </type> 
      <subType> 
        <coding> 
          <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/resource-types"/> 
          <code value="ServiceRequest"/> 
        </coding> 
      </subType> 
      <!--   by not specifying term.actor I assume this means everyone?   -->
      <offer> 
        <text value="Withhold orders from any provider."/> 
      </offer> 
    </group> 
    <group> 
      <type> 
        <coding> 
          <!--   made up code system   -->
          <system value="http://example.org/fhir/consent-term-type-codes"/> 
          <code value="withhold-object-type"/> 
        </coding> 
      </type> 
      <subType> 
        <coding> 
          <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/resource-types"/> 
          <code value="DiagnosticReport"/> 
        </coding> 
      </subType> 
      <!--   by not specifying term.actor I assume this means everyone?   -->
      <offer> 
        <text value="Withhold order results from any provider."/> 
      </offer> 
    </group> 
  </term> 

  <!--   the terms of the consent in friendly consumer speak   -->
  <friendly> 
    <contentAttachment> 
      <title value="The terms of the consent in friendly consumer speak."/> 
      <!--   likely use url pointer to common text   -->
    </contentAttachment> 
  </friendly> 

  <!--   the legal terms of the consent in lawyer speak   -->
  <legal> 
    <contentAttachment> 
      <title value="The terms of the consent in lawyer speak."/> 
      <!--   likely use url pointer to common text   -->
      <!--   I think some think that this should be the pointer to the law by which this consent
       is derived under. Such as http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/P-21/index.html   -->
    </contentAttachment> 
  </legal> 
</Contract> 

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.