Validation Results for IHE_ITI_MHD

Generated Tue Jun 11 14:49:40 UTC 2024, FHIR version 4.0.1 for ihe.iti.mhd#4.2.3-current (canonical = (history)). See Full QA Report

Quality Checks
Publisher Version:IG Publisher Version: v1.6.11
Publication Code:n/a . PackageId = ihe.iti.mhd, Canonical =
Realm Check for n/a:
  • n/a
Publication Request:
  • Publication Request is for v'4.2.2' but package version is v4.2.3-current
  • Publication Request is for version v4.2.2 which is already published
Supressed Messages:31 Suppressed Issues
Dependency Checks:
PackageVersionFHIRCanonicalWeb BaseComment
.. ihe.iti.mhd4.2.3-currentR4
... hl7.terminology.r45.5.0 MR4http://terminology.hl7.org
... hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r45.1.0 MR4
... ihe.iti.balp1.1.3 MR4 to latest patch release (1.1.x->1.1.3)
.... hl7.terminology.r45.3.0 OR4http://terminology.hl7.org Release is 5.5.0
.... hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r41.0.0 OR4 Release is 5.1.0
... ihe.formatcode.fhir1.2.0 OR4 to latest patch release (1.2.x->1.2.0). Latest Release is 1.3.0
.... hl7.terminology.r45.3.0 OR4http://terminology.hl7.org above. Latest Release is 5.5.0
.... hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r41.0.0 OR4 above. Latest Release is 5.1.0
Templates: ihe.fhir.template#0.12.0 -> fhir.base.template#0.8.0. Tools: 0.1.0
Dependent IGs:5 guides
Global Profiles:(none declared)
Terminology Server(s): (details)
HTA Analysis:Non-HL7 Igs are exempt from terminology dependency analysis
R5 Dependencies:(none)
Draft Dependencies:
Modifier Extensions:(none)
Previous Version Comparison: Comparison with version 4.2.2
IPA Comparison: n/a
IPS Comparison: n/a
Summary: errors = 0, warn = 0, info = 0, broken links = 0
Build Errors000

n/a Show Validation Information

Suppressed Messages (Warnings, hints, broken links)

FHIR R4 had the valueset setup wrong. We are using the proper system value

IG publisher caused warning. Grahame indicates we should ignore for now

IHE code system used but never defined by IHE as a formal codeSystem

The concept map is from EB-Registry defined values, so we are using rfc3986. not a problem the source checking isn't done

The concept map is from a conceptual valueset from IHE, so there is no formal definition. not a problem the source checking isn't done

YES we know some examples use old codes. That old code use is not important to the example use

YES we want to point informatively at MHDS and NOT to have a dependency.

profile for MHD that is just structural and thus has no examples

some examples are underpopulated, the full population is not important for the use-case being explained

yes we know we are using non normative resources and valuesets

Errors sorted by type