Da Vinci Prior Authorization Support (PAS) FHIR IG
2.2.0-snapshot - STU 2.2 - Public Review United States of America flag

Da Vinci Prior Authorization Support (PAS) FHIR IG, published by HL7 International / Financial Management. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 2.2.0-snapshot built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/HL7/davinci-pas/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions

Requirements: Narrative Conformance Statements

2.2.0-snapshot
Official URL: http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-pas/Requirements/fromNarrative Version:
Standards status: Trial-use Active as of 2026-01-30 Maturity Level: 4 Computable Name: FromNarrative
Other Identifiers: OID:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.40.24.36.1

Conformance statements found throughout the narrative of the IG consolidated into this computable resource for traceability purposes

Language: en

These requirements apply to the following actors:

1SHALL

spec-77:A subscription-based mechanism SHALL be used by the client to be informed of updates to the authorization.

2SHALL

spec-77:A subscription-based mechanism SHALL be used by the client to be informed of updates to the authorization.

3SHALL

spec-33:Each item returned on the PAS ClaimResponse SHALL echo the same item.sequence as that same item had on the Claim. The item.sequence element SHALL serve as the main tracing identifier of items throughout requests and responses.

4SHALL

spec-33:Each item returned on the PAS ClaimResponse SHALL echo the same item.sequence as that same item had on the Claim. The item.sequence element SHALL serve as the main tracing identifier of items throughout requests and responses.

Payers MAY request additional information in a number of waysMAY

A payer MAY request additional information from the provider to support a prior authorization request by responding to the X12 278 Request with an X12 278 Response that includes any of the following:

  1. One or more codes in the PWK01 element
  2. One or more of the approved LOINC codes Attachments – LOINC in the HI segment
  3. A single 102089-0 LOINC code in the HI segment to request information via a payer’s specific questionnaire.
ainfo-2SHALL

When a single LOINC code is used, the TRN at the X12 278 header or line level associated with the 102089-0 LOINC code SHALL be the DTR context ID used to retrieve the appropriate questionnaire.

ainfo-3SHALL

The PAS task profile SHALL be used to convey PAS X12 278 Response information to CDex.

ainfo-4SHOULD

All of the additional information request codes SHOULD be used as input to a CDex task.

ainfo-5SHALL

When the LOINC code 102089-0 is present, the associated TRNs SHALL also be exchange as Task.input.

ainfo-6SHALL

A separate task SHALL be created for each of the above attachment request types (PWK01, LOINC, questionnaire).

conf-1SHALL

Payers SHALL have a distinct endpoint for each different supported version (which are not inter-version compatible) of the PAS specification.

conf-2SHALL

If a payer supports endpoint discovery, they SHALL have at most a single endpoint for each combination of version of the specification and coverage (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial) they provide coverage under.

conf-3SHALL

If a payer does not support endpoint discovery, they SHALL expose only one PAS endpoint of each supported version capable of handling all coverages.

conf-4SHALL

PA Intermediary Systems SHALL be capable of processing all data elements that are marked as Must Support on the Claim Request and Claim Inquiry.

conf-5

They SHALL NOT generate an error or cause the application to fail due the presence of any data element marked as Must Support.

conf-6SHALL

PA Intermediary Systems SHALL be capable of returning resource instances containing any of the data elements that are marked as Must Support on the Claim Response and the Claim Inquiry Response.

conf-7SHALL

PA Client Systems SHALL be capable of receiving all data elements that are marked as Must Support on the Claim Response and the Claim Inquiry Response.

conf-8

They SHALL NOT generate an error or cause the application to fail when receiving any data element that is marked as Must Support.

conf-9SHOULD-NOT

PA Client Systems SHOULD NOT send any data elements that are not marked as Must Support.

conf-10MAY

If these data elements are included in a Claim Request or Claim Inquiry, the receiving PA Intermediary System MAY ignore those elements.

conf-11

When processing prior auth requests and additional data submissions, PAS services SHALL NOT depend on or set expectations for the inclusion of resource instances not compliant with profiles defined in this guide, CRD, DTR, HRex, or US Core.

conf-12

Similarly, they SHALL NOT depend on or set expectations for the inclusion of any data elements not marked as mandatory (min cardinality >= 1) or mustSupport in those profiles.

conf-13MAY

If the proposed change is adopted and published in the PAS continuous integration build or the CI build of one of its dependencies (e.g. US Core), implementations MAY, by mutual agreement, pre-adopt the use of those additional profiles and/or mustSupport data elements and not be considered in violation of #1 above.

conf-14
  1. Where cardinality and other constraints present in profiles allow data elements to be omitted, PAS compliant systems SHALL NOT treat the omission of those elements as a conformance error.
conf-15SHALL
  1. PAS clients and services SHALL use standard PAS data elements (i.e. elements found within PAS-defined or inherited profiles and marked as mandatory or mustSupport) to communicate needed data if such elements are intended to convey such information.
conf-16MAY
  1. PAS implementing organizations SHALL NOT publish guidance setting expectations for where certain data elements are conveyed within PAS and inherited data structures, but MAY submit change requests to PAS, HRex, or US Core requesting that additional guidance be provided to implementers on data structure usage to increase consistency across implementations.
metric-1SHOULD, MAY

Each of these IGs recommends a set of metrics that SHOULD or MAY be collected by their respective implementations to facilitate the evaluation of adoption, functionality, processes, and improved outcomes.

metric-2SHOULD

PAS implementers SHOULD store information for each PAS call in a manner that would allow them to respond to measures based on this logical model.

priv-1SHALL

Implementations SHALL permit provider review of data prior to transmission, but SHALL NOT require such review.

priv-2SHOULD

Payers who do not view the FHIR version of the transmitted information SHOULD be aware of the possibility of these limitations and ensure they have policies that enforce appropriate sharing constraints on data.

priv-3SHOULD, MAY

PAS Servers SHOULD support server-server OAuth and MAY support mutually authenticated TLS.

Timings SHALL have at least a count, frequency and period, a calendarPattern, or a deliveryPatternSHALL

Each PAS Timing SHALL have at least one of:

  1. count (with optional countMax)
  2. frequency and period and periodUnit (with optional frequencyMax and periodMax)
  3. calendarPattern extension
  4. deliveryPattern extension
Quantities SHALL have a value and either a unit or a codeSHALL

Each PAS Quantity SHALL have:**

  1. a value
  2. either a unit or a code and system.
prof-3SHALL

The Claim instance of the update Bundle SHALL reference the updated Claim instance within the Claim.related.claim element. Note that the presence of this reference and the requirement that referenced instances be included in the submitted Bundle implies that the instance representing the prior version of the Claim SHALL be included in the update Bundle.

prof-4SHALL

The Claim instance of the update Bundle SHALL contain within the Claim.item element each item requested in the updated claim and any prior versions of the claim, including requested items that have been added, modified, deleted, or left unchanged during this or previous updates.

prof-5SHALL

The Claim instance of the update Bundle SHALL contain within the Claim.supportingInfo element each piece of supporting documentation submitted with the updated claim and any prior versions of claim, including supporting documentation that has been added, modified, deleted, or left unchanged during this or previous updates.

prof-6SHALL

Each Claim.item entry that represents an item no longer being requested, whether removed in this update or a previous one, SHALL be flagged using the infoCancelledFlag modifierExtension and SHALL have the code 3 (Cancel) in the Certification Type extension.

prof-7SHALL

Each Claim.supportingInfo entry that is no longer to be used when evaluating the request, whether removed in this update or a previous one, SHALL be flagged using the infoCancelledFlag modifierExtension.

prof-8SHALL

Each Claim.item and Claim.supportingInfo entry that has been changed as a part of this most recent update, including removal, SHALL be flagged using the changed extension with a value of changed.

prof-9SHALL

Each Claim.item and Claim.supportingInfo entry that has been added as a part of this most recent update, SHALL be flagged using the changed extension with a value of added.

prof-tim-2SHALL

If a code is present, it SHALL use the X12 quantity units.

spec-1SHALL

Along with the profiles defined in the PAS implementation guide, implementations SHALL also support the US Core R4 profiles for Condition, Observation, and Procedure.

spec-2SHOULD

They SHOULD support any other profiles relevant to the types of prior authorizations they process.

spec-3SHOULD

Clients and Servers supporting this implementation guide SHOULD also comply with the Da Vinci Coverage Requirements Discovery (CRD) and Documentation Templates and Rules (DTR) implementation guides.

spec-4SHALL

Every system claiming conformance to this IG SHALL comply with the Security and Privacy page in the Da Vinci HRex guide.

spec-5SHALL

If a payer supports endpoint discovery, they SHALL have at most a single endpoint for each coverage (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial) they provide coverage under.

spec-6SHALL

If a payer does not support endpoint discovery, they SHALL expose only one PAS endpoint capable of handling all coverages.

spec-11SHOULD

All of this SHOULD happen synchronously with a maximum of 15 seconds between the user initiating the prior authorization request and seeing the resulting response - i.e. including network transmission time for request and response.

spec-12SHOULD-NOT

NOTE: The Claim Inquiry response does not include all of the information that can be returned in a request response, such as any request for additional information, so the inquire operation SHOULD NOT be used by the client while waiting for final results.

spec-13MAY

Provider and EHR Vendor organizations MAY leverage the payer registry developed by PDex (which will eventually fold into the national directory under FAST) as a means of determining which endpoints exist for which payers as candidates for configuration.

spec-14SHALL

The Bundle SHALL be encoded in JSON.

spec-15SHALL

The first entry in the Bundle SHALL be a Claim resource complying with the profile defined in this IG to ensure the content is sufficient to appropriately populate an X12N/005010X217 message.

spec-16SHALL

Additional Bundle entries SHALL be populated with any resources referenced by the Claim resource (and any resources referenced by those resources, fully traversing all references and complying with all identified profiles).

spec-17SHALL

Note that even if a given resource instance is referenced multiple times, it SHALL only appear in the Bundle once.

spec-18SHOULD

E.g., if the same Practitioner information is referenced in multiple places, only one Practitioner instance SHOULD be created - referenced from multiple places as appropriate.

spec-19SHALL

Bundle.entry.fullUrl values SHALL be:

spec-20SHALL

All GUIDs used SHALL be unique, including across independent prior authorization submissions - with the exception that the same resource instance being referenced in distinct prior authorization request Bundles can have the same GUID.

spec-21SHALL

Relevant resources referenced by those "supporting information" resources SHALL also be included (e.g. prescriber Practitioner and Medication for a MedicationRequest).

spec-22SHALL

Any such resource that has a US Core profile SHALL comply with the relevant US Core profiles.

spec-23SHALL

All "supporting information" resources included in the Bundle SHALL be pointed to by the Claim resource using the Claim.supportingInfo.valueReference element.

spec-24SHOULD

To attach non-FHIR instance data such as PDFs, CDAs, JPGs, a DocumentReference instance SHOULD be used.

spec-25SHALL

The Claim.supportingInfo.sequence for each entry SHALL be unique within the Claim.

spec-26SHALL

All resources SHALL comply with their respective profiles.

spec-27SHOULD, MAY

FHIR elements not marked as 'must support' MAY be included in resources within the Bundle, but client systems SHOULD have no expectation of such elements being processed by the payer unless prior arrangements have been made.

spec-28SHALL, MAY

Systems that do not process such elements SHALL ignore unsupported elements unless they are 'modifier' elements, in which case the system MAY treat the presence of the element as an error.

spec-29SHALL

In addition, the system SHALL make the entire PAS FHIR Bundle available to the intended payer.

spec-30MAY

The method MAY be based on the X12 275 or another method that trading partners have agreed to use.

spec-31SHALL

If the X12 275 is used for this purpose, the 275 BDS01 Filter ID Code element SHALL be set to "B64" and the CAT02 Attachment Information Format Code element SHALL be sent to "HL".

spec-32SHOULD

Translation/mapping systems SHOULD be aware that if the size of the attachments as part of a claims submission would exceed the size limitations of a particular recipient, the intermediary SHOULD split the attachments into separate 275s to remain within the overall limit.

spec-35SHALL

The Bundle SHALL start with a ClaimResponse entry that contains information mapped from the 278 response.

spec-36SHALL

When converting additional Bundle entries, the conversion process SHALL ensure that only one resource is created for a given combination of content.

spec-37SHOULD

E.g. if the same Practitioner information is referenced in multiple places, only one Practitioner instance SHOULD be created - referenced from multiple places as appropriate.

spec-38SHALL

When echoing back resources that are the same as were present in the prior authorization request, the system SHALL ensure that the same fullUrl and resource identifiers are used in the response as appeared in the request.

spec-39SHALL

In these instances, the receiving system SHALL return OperationOutcome instances that detail why the Bundle could not be processed and no ClaimResponse will be returned.

spec-40SHALL

For instances where the authorized item is a modification of the requested item, the requested item SHALL be returned in the ClaimResponse.item with an adjudication status of A6 - 'Modified'.

spec-41SHALL

The actual authorized item SHALL be returned in the ClaimResponse.addItem.

spec-42SHOULD

The new intent of this extension is to indicate what was authorized which SHOULD match what was requested since the ClaimResponse.item does not have this information.

spec-43SHALL

If what has been authorized is different, then the ClaimResponse.addItem SHALL be used.

spec-44SHOULD

Recipients of the transactions SHOULD respond as indicated below and senders of the transaction SHOULD look for the following responses and then take appropriate actions.

spec-45SHALL

All transactions in PAS are synchronous and SHALL require one of the following HTTP responses:

spec-46SHOULD

If an OperationOutcome is received, it may have information regarding errors that SHOULD be addressed in the future, but did not cause the transaction to fail.

spec-47SHOULD

NOTE: These errors SHOULD not be returned to the provider but SHOULD be reviewed and addressed by technical staff.

spec-48SHOULD

Although there are no constraints on the frequency of the query, clients SHOULD ensure that no repetitive inquiries do not happen so as not to stress payer systems.

spec-49SHOULD

To search for a specific claim, the Claim.identifier can be sent and it SHOULD be either the previously returned Administration Reference Number (REF-BB) or the Prior Authorization Number (REF-NT).

spec-50SHALL

Intermediaries SHALL interpret the 'not-applicable' code as no product or service code.

spec-51SHALL

This Claim Inquiry Response SHALL either reference a Claim or have a Data Absent Reason indicating why the Claim can not be referenced (eg. original claim received by fax).

spec-52SHOULD

The referenced Claim instance SHOULD be returned if there is information in the Response that needs to be present can not be returned in the Claim Response instance.

spec-53SHALL

the returned ClaimResponse SHALL include the current results for all submitted items, including any items changed or canceled since the original authoriation request.

spec-54SHALL

if a specific reference number (either the REF-NT or REF-BB) is submitted and is not the 'current' number (because subsequent additions/changes/cancellations have been made to the prior authorization request), the returned record SHALL be the current authorization response - even though it no longer has the same identifier.

spec-55SHALL

I.e. If a search is for a 'replaced' prior authorization, the search result SHALL include the 'current' prior authorization response for the most recent replacing prior authorization request.

spec-56MAY

systems MAY withhold information about prior authorizations that are 'open' but are deemed to be not relevant to the provider (eg. prior authorization requests for sensitive care where the requesting provider is neither the ordering nor rendering provider) who is checking for the prior authorization status if not searching by a specific Claim identifier.

spec-57SHOULD

In such situations the response SHOULD include an OperationOutcome warning that some prior authorizations have been suppressed and provide an alternative mechanism (e.g. telephone number) to provide further information if needed.

spec-58SHALL

To retrieve the response at a later point, implementers SHALL support subscriptions.

spec-59SHALL

Servers SHALL permit access to the prior authorization response to systems other than the original submitter.

spec-60SHALL

They SHALL require a match on the patient member or subscriber id (identifier on the Claim.patient) plus the ordering and/or rendering provider identifier, i.e. the provider's NPI.

spec-61SHALL

Implementers SHALL support the R4 Subscriptions referenced in the Subscriptions for R5 Backport Implementation Guide.

spec-62SHALL

This Subscription SHALL conform to the PAS Subscription profile.

spec-63SHALL

The Subscription filter criteria SHALL be org-identifier = [sending system identifier].

spec-64SHALL

Intermediaries SHALL ensure that subscriptions to monitor a particular sending system's prior authorizations are only created or modified by that sending system.

spec-65SHALL

Servers supporting subscriptions SHALL expose this as part of the Server's CapabilityStatement

spec-66SHALL

Servers SHALL support rest-hook

spec-67SHALL

Once the subscription has been created, the Server SHALL send a notification over the requested channel indicating that a prior authorization response submitted by the requesting provider organization has changed.

spec-68SHALL

Due to the inquiry not supporting all of the required information needed in a PAS response, PAS Clients and Intermediaries SHALL only support subscriptions with content='full-resource'.

spec-70SHOULD

When details of a submitted request change and a provider needs to request prior authorization of a different set of items, clients SHOULD submit an update to the previously submitted Claim.

spec-71MAY

Servers MAY reject updates and require that a new request is made by providing the appropriate X12 error code.

spec-72SHALL

Systems SHALL communicate a cancellation of an item if the corresponding order is canceled and a final authorization determination has not yet been received for that item.

spec-73SHOULD

This is appropriate if the added items share the same context and SHOULD be evaluated in conjunction with the other items in the previously submitted authorization request.

spec-74SHALL

The Claim Update Bundle SHALL contain the Claim Update instance as the first entry.

spec-75SHALL

The Claim that is being updated SHALL be included in the Bundle.

spec-76

If that Claim instance is itself a Claim Update, its referenced Claim SHALL NOT be included.

spec-77SHALL

All other referenced resources SHALL be included in the Bundle.

spec-78SHALL

PAS systems SHALL ensure that prior authorizations that were initially pended remain available for query for at least 6 months after the anticipated completion of the services whose authorization was requested.

use-1SHALL

The intermediary SHALL always exchange a FHIR bundle with the EHR (figure 2.3)

use-2SHALL

The intermediary SHALL convert the FHIR bundle to and from an X12 278 (and optionally to an X12 275) if necessary to meet the HIPAA transaction requirements

use-3MAY

The intermediary MAY convert the X12 278 to and from a FHIR bundle and exchange it with a payer as long as the PA request and response are in an X12 278 format at some time between the exchange with the EHR and the payer

use-4SHOULD

As well, EHRs SHOULD annotate their orders with the decisions contained in the PAS Response.

use-5SHALL

Prior to sending clinical data as part of the PAS exchange, the provider (or their designated agent) SHALL have the ability, but not an obligation, to review patient information and where appropriate amend or withhold the submission to comply with current regulations and relevant provider policies. The provider can choose to turn off the ability to review documentation. The vendor must allow them this option.

use-6SHOULD

All exchanges SHOULD meet Federal and state regulations, including any HIPAA restrictions and restrictions on sensitive data.