US Core Implementation Guide, published by HL7 International / Cross-Group Projects. This guide is not an authorized publication; it is the continuous build for version 8.0.0-ballot built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) CI Build. This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/HL7/US-Core/ and changes regularly. See the Directory of published versions
Other Identifiers: OID:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.3.40
Copyright/Legal: On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department implemented the five-digit ZIP Code, which was placed after the state name in the last line of an address. To provide room for the ZIP Code, the Department issued two-letter abbreviations for all states and territories. Publication 59, Abbreviations for Use with ZIP Code, issued by the Department in October 1963. There is no copyright restriction on this value set.
This value set defines two letter USPS alphabetic codes.
Include all codes defined in https://www.usps.com/
Expansion
Generated Narrative: ValueSet
This value set contains 62 concepts
Code
System
Display
AL
https://www.usps.com/
Alabama
AK
https://www.usps.com/
Alaska
AS
https://www.usps.com/
American Samoa
AZ
https://www.usps.com/
Arizona
AR
https://www.usps.com/
Arkansas
CA
https://www.usps.com/
California
CO
https://www.usps.com/
Colorado
CT
https://www.usps.com/
Connecticut
DE
https://www.usps.com/
Delaware
DC
https://www.usps.com/
District of Columbia
FM
https://www.usps.com/
Federated States of Micronesia
FL
https://www.usps.com/
Florida
GA
https://www.usps.com/
Georgia
GU
https://www.usps.com/
Guam
HI
https://www.usps.com/
Hawaii
ID
https://www.usps.com/
Idaho
IL
https://www.usps.com/
Illinois
IN
https://www.usps.com/
Indiana
IA
https://www.usps.com/
Iowa
KS
https://www.usps.com/
Kansas
KY
https://www.usps.com/
Kentucky
LA
https://www.usps.com/
Louisiana
ME
https://www.usps.com/
Maine
MH
https://www.usps.com/
Marshall Islands
MD
https://www.usps.com/
Maryland
MA
https://www.usps.com/
Massachusetts
MI
https://www.usps.com/
Michigan
MN
https://www.usps.com/
Minnesota
MS
https://www.usps.com/
Mississippi
MO
https://www.usps.com/
Missouri
MT
https://www.usps.com/
Montana
NE
https://www.usps.com/
Nebraska
NV
https://www.usps.com/
Nevada
NH
https://www.usps.com/
New Hampshire
NJ
https://www.usps.com/
New Jersey
NM
https://www.usps.com/
New Mexico
NY
https://www.usps.com/
New York
NC
https://www.usps.com/
North Carolina
ND
https://www.usps.com/
North Dakota
MP
https://www.usps.com/
Northern Mariana Islands
OH
https://www.usps.com/
Ohio
OK
https://www.usps.com/
Oklahoma
OR
https://www.usps.com/
Oregon
PW
https://www.usps.com/
Palau
PA
https://www.usps.com/
Pennsylvania
PR
https://www.usps.com/
Puerto Rico
RI
https://www.usps.com/
Rhode Island
SC
https://www.usps.com/
South Carolina
SD
https://www.usps.com/
South Dakota
TN
https://www.usps.com/
Tennessee
TX
https://www.usps.com/
Texas
UT
https://www.usps.com/
Utah
VT
https://www.usps.com/
Vermont
VI
https://www.usps.com/
Virgin Islands
VA
https://www.usps.com/
Virginia
WA
https://www.usps.com/
Washington
WV
https://www.usps.com/
West Virginia
WI
https://www.usps.com/
Wisconsin
WY
https://www.usps.com/
Wyoming
AE
https://www.usps.com/
Armed Forces Europe, the Middle East, and Canada
AP
https://www.usps.com/
Armed Forces Pacific
AA
https://www.usps.com/
Armed Forces Americas (except Canada)
Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:
Level
A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level.
In this scheme, some codes are under other codes, and imply that the code they are under also applies
System
The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere)
Code
The code (used as the code in the resource instance)
Display
The display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application